F5F Stay Refreshed Software Operating Systems 64bit Google Chrome version

64bit Google Chrome version

64bit Google Chrome version

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
T
tBxSilent
Junior Member
7
11-30-2016, 03:32 AM
#1
Google unveiled the stable 64-bit Chrome for Windows 7 and 8 in June. Until now, the 64-bit release remained unavailable in a reliable form. Today, they announced the stable version as part of the Chrome 37 update. As anticipated, this version offers quicker browsing, greater stability, and enhanced security. The company highlights better media handling, such as the VP9 codec for YouTube HD videos, promising a 15% improvement in decoding speed. Beta testing results also show the 64-bit rendering engines are nearly twice as stable compared to their 32-bit counterparts.
T
tBxSilent
11-30-2016, 03:32 AM #1

Google unveiled the stable 64-bit Chrome for Windows 7 and 8 in June. Until now, the 64-bit release remained unavailable in a reliable form. Today, they announced the stable version as part of the Chrome 37 update. As anticipated, this version offers quicker browsing, greater stability, and enhanced security. The company highlights better media handling, such as the VP9 codec for YouTube HD videos, promising a 15% improvement in decoding speed. Beta testing results also show the 64-bit rendering engines are nearly twice as stable compared to their 32-bit counterparts.

G
Goddesss
Member
103
12-01-2016, 10:14 AM
#2
Have you found the challenge more intense lately?
G
Goddesss
12-01-2016, 10:14 AM #2

Have you found the challenge more intense lately?

P
pooh_bear6
Member
192
12-01-2016, 02:06 PM
#3
No thought, no idea what it does. But when I shared this, it consumed up to 0.4% of my CPU (specs in sig) and 80MB of RAM.
P
pooh_bear6
12-01-2016, 02:06 PM #3

No thought, no idea what it does. But when I shared this, it consumed up to 0.4% of my CPU (specs in sig) and 80MB of RAM.

J
Jugga1025
Member
60
12-01-2016, 02:13 PM
#4
Very distinct from Canary. Performance varies noticeably—canary shows higher CPU usage and more noticeable spikes, while this version runs lighter. Both use similar RAM amounts, but canary experiences more frequent load variations and higher idle consumption.
J
Jugga1025
12-01-2016, 02:13 PM #4

Very distinct from Canary. Performance varies noticeably—canary shows higher CPU usage and more noticeable spikes, while this version runs lighter. Both use similar RAM amounts, but canary experiences more frequent load variations and higher idle consumption.

X
XtremeEm
Junior Member
3
12-02-2016, 12:01 PM
#5
Das ist deutlich weniger als zuvor. Vielen Dank für die Informationen.
X
XtremeEm
12-02-2016, 12:01 PM #5

Das ist deutlich weniger als zuvor. Vielen Dank für die Informationen.

A
AboooDy919
Member
207
12-07-2016, 02:13 PM
#6
Canary is running poorly. Stability remains consistent.
A
AboooDy919
12-07-2016, 02:13 PM #6

Canary is running poorly. Stability remains consistent.

K
Kaldeo
Member
226
12-07-2016, 03:22 PM
#7
You're using a 64-bit Firefox version, but for the BattleLog you need a 32-bit browser. Chrome is a good alternative if you want something lightweight and compatible.
K
Kaldeo
12-07-2016, 03:22 PM #7

You're using a 64-bit Firefox version, but for the BattleLog you need a 32-bit browser. Chrome is a good alternative if you want something lightweight and compatible.

B
Back2Blaze
Member
204
12-07-2016, 03:30 PM
#8
The only issues I've faced are with Barclays' website - it doesn't like mine. Otherwise, everything has worked smoothly for me.
B
Back2Blaze
12-07-2016, 03:30 PM #8

The only issues I've faced are with Barclays' website - it doesn't like mine. Otherwise, everything has worked smoothly for me.

L
livtheviking
Posting Freak
846
12-09-2016, 01:14 AM
#9
I gave it a shot and didn’t notice much change. It might be due to the short testing time or the plugin not supporting 64-bit browsers, so I switched back to 32-bit now.
L
livtheviking
12-09-2016, 01:14 AM #9

I gave it a shot and didn’t notice much change. It might be due to the short testing time or the plugin not supporting 64-bit browsers, so I switched back to 32-bit now.

S
SoyDash
Posting Freak
859
12-10-2016, 12:41 AM
#10
64-bit can offer performance benefits and may run more smoothly. Installing a 64-bit version over a 32-bit one can help, especially if you experience issues with tabs getting lost. Many tabs open multiple times, so a more robust system might improve stability. Chrome could also provide better options for reopening instances.
S
SoyDash
12-10-2016, 12:41 AM #10

64-bit can offer performance benefits and may run more smoothly. Installing a 64-bit version over a 32-bit one can help, especially if you experience issues with tabs getting lost. Many tabs open multiple times, so a more robust system might improve stability. Chrome could also provide better options for reopening instances.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next