6000MHz cl 30 compared to cl 36

F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop 6000MHz cl 30 compared to cl 36

Emmaaaa
Member

133

05-15-2023, 08:16 PM

For your new build 16x2 targeting RZ 5 7600, lower timing like CL30 tends to be better for both gaming and everyday tasks.

Emmaaaa

05-15-2023, 08:16 PM #1

For your new build 16x2 targeting RZ 5 7600, lower timing like CL30 tends to be better for both gaming and everyday tasks.

GekkeSchildpad
Member

211

05-15-2023, 10:58 PM

Choose smaller values to reduce latency.

GekkeSchildpad

05-15-2023, 10:58 PM #2

Choose smaller values to reduce latency.

themagnum310
Member

164

05-18-2023, 03:18 PM

Lower and snugger's preferred, yet the absolute lowest still edges out. For instance, 6000MT/sec 30-38-38-96 outperforms 36-36-36-76, with the CL30 kit emerging victorious.

themagnum310

05-18-2023, 03:18 PM #3

Lower and snugger's preferred, yet the absolute lowest still edges out. For instance, 6000MT/sec 30-38-38-96 outperforms 36-36-36-76, with the CL30 kit emerging victorious.

JeroScuach
Member

05-19-2023, 09:11 AM

It's worth mentioning that you won't see much practical change between those two standard XMP/EXPO settings. For those who enjoy fine-tuning their storage, the distinction starts to matter more.

JeroScuach

05-19-2023, 09:11 AM #4

It's worth mentioning that you won't see much practical change between those two standard XMP/EXPO settings. For those who enjoy fine-tuning their storage, the distinction starts to matter more.