F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop 5th Gen Intel Core i5 10th Gen processor running at 3.9-4.1 GHz during Cinebench R23 tests on a B560 motherboard.

5th Gen Intel Core i5 10th Gen processor running at 3.9-4.1 GHz during Cinebench R23 tests on a B560 motherboard.

5th Gen Intel Core i5 10th Gen processor running at 3.9-4.1 GHz during Cinebench R23 tests on a B560 motherboard.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
H
hipposatheart
Junior Member
1
08-31-2021, 03:20 AM
#1
I ran stress tests on the 10400 using Cinebench R23 with both single-core and multi-core modes. HWInfo was used to monitor clock speeds and temperatures. Both tests kept CPU usage under 4.1 GHz. It seems my B560 board has a power limit that restricts CPU speed. Is this true for your setup? Also, I’m using the stock Intel cooler now, and temperatures are in the high 80s. Could it be a cooling problem? I have a case with good airflow but only one exhaust fan. The PC will mainly run office tasks and AutoCAD for a colleague. I’m worried about performance impact, especially the 200 MHz drop from maximum turbo boost.
H
hipposatheart
08-31-2021, 03:20 AM #1

I ran stress tests on the 10400 using Cinebench R23 with both single-core and multi-core modes. HWInfo was used to monitor clock speeds and temperatures. Both tests kept CPU usage under 4.1 GHz. It seems my B560 board has a power limit that restricts CPU speed. Is this true for your setup? Also, I’m using the stock Intel cooler now, and temperatures are in the high 80s. Could it be a cooling problem? I have a case with good airflow but only one exhaust fan. The PC will mainly run office tasks and AutoCAD for a colleague. I’m worried about performance impact, especially the 200 MHz drop from maximum turbo boost.

M
mlodypatyk
Member
70
09-02-2021, 05:14 PM
#2
You chose the cheapest B560 model without any VRM cooling. Your clock speeds are typical since the core boost stays capped at 4GHz.
M
mlodypatyk
09-02-2021, 05:14 PM #2

You chose the cheapest B560 model without any VRM cooling. Your clock speeds are typical since the core boost stays capped at 4GHz.

C
Caldirr
Junior Member
2
09-03-2021, 10:43 AM
#3
The temperature during your cinebench tests was quite high, possibly pushing the limits of a high-performance Intel stock cooler.
C
Caldirr
09-03-2021, 10:43 AM #3

The temperature during your cinebench tests was quite high, possibly pushing the limits of a high-performance Intel stock cooler.

T
teddybear116
Member
232
09-05-2021, 12:49 AM
#4
It wasn't my main priority, but it was definitely in the upper 80s.
T
teddybear116
09-05-2021, 12:49 AM #4

It wasn't my main priority, but it was definitely in the upper 80s.

N
nach_gamer
Junior Member
7
09-11-2021, 10:25 AM
#5
Sure, the problem lies in combining high temperatures with low VRM performance. For office tasks, a 200MHz difference is usually unnoticeable, but in AutoCAD it could become apparent (very unlikely).
N
nach_gamer
09-11-2021, 10:25 AM #5

Sure, the problem lies in combining high temperatures with low VRM performance. For office tasks, a 200MHz difference is usually unnoticeable, but in AutoCAD it could become apparent (very unlikely).

I
iGrizzly
Junior Member
19
09-11-2021, 05:17 PM
#6
I
iGrizzly
09-11-2021, 05:17 PM #6

G
gamingninja18
Junior Member
22
09-11-2021, 07:41 PM
#7
You're correct, the maximum all-core turbo is 4GHz. You're on the right track for aiming to improve slightly more.
G
gamingninja18
09-11-2021, 07:41 PM #7

You're correct, the maximum all-core turbo is 4GHz. You're on the right track for aiming to improve slightly more.

G
Gholtor
Member
160
09-18-2021, 07:47 PM
#8
It may not fix the issue, but opting for a more advanced cooler is preferable.
G
Gholtor
09-18-2021, 07:47 PM #8

It may not fix the issue, but opting for a more advanced cooler is preferable.

E
enricoelias
Junior Member
13
09-21-2021, 06:54 AM
#9
All core loads at 4GHz are suitable.
E
enricoelias
09-21-2021, 06:54 AM #9

All core loads at 4GHz are suitable.

P
195
10-05-2021, 07:54 AM
#10
The multi-core test reached a maximum of just under 4.0 GHz, which seems acceptable. The single-core test hit 4.1 GHz without exceeding it. Is this typical?
P
PARAN0ID_M3DIC
10-05-2021, 07:54 AM #10

The multi-core test reached a maximum of just under 4.0 GHz, which seems acceptable. The single-core test hit 4.1 GHz without exceeding it. Is this typical?

Pages (2): 1 2 Next