F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Networks 5G Poll

5G Poll

5G Poll

Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next
P
pinkwolf_pvp
Member
144
05-20-2021, 12:16 AM
#1
I shared information about 5G for a school assignment, but this is simply genuine interest. What are your opinions? Do you back it? Why?
P
pinkwolf_pvp
05-20-2021, 12:16 AM #1

I shared information about 5G for a school assignment, but this is simply genuine interest. What are your opinions? Do you back it? Why?

G
garto123
Member
53
05-29-2021, 10:09 AM
#2
It’s better not to back it up. Sure, 5G friendly gadgets are pricier, but that’s just the fact that it’s still emerging technology.
G
garto123
05-29-2021, 10:09 AM #2

It’s better not to back it up. Sure, 5G friendly gadgets are pricier, but that’s just the fact that it’s still emerging technology.

C
CiscoMiner
Senior Member
500
06-09-2021, 09:02 PM
#3
I have another alternative in mind.
C
CiscoMiner
06-09-2021, 09:02 PM #3

I have another alternative in mind.

B
Blaemlol
Junior Member
33
06-10-2021, 06:23 AM
#4
I say this because I know a looot of ppl who are against it bc it apparently emanates harmful radiation. I personally am for it, because there's no real proof for the radiation.
B
Blaemlol
06-10-2021, 06:23 AM #4

I say this because I know a looot of ppl who are against it bc it apparently emanates harmful radiation. I personally am for it, because there's no real proof for the radiation.

L
loick3333
Member
119
06-10-2021, 07:56 AM
#5
I don’t back anything up unless absolutely necessary. I won’t upgrade my phone or pay extra just for a better version. However, I’m all for those who do want this. I use minimal mobile data most of the time, and wherever I go there’s always Wi-Fi available.
L
loick3333
06-10-2021, 07:56 AM #5

I don’t back anything up unless absolutely necessary. I won’t upgrade my phone or pay extra just for a better version. However, I’m all for those who do want this. I use minimal mobile data most of the time, and wherever I go there’s always Wi-Fi available.

Y
Yoshishrimp
Junior Member
6
06-15-2021, 03:57 PM
#6
If this were a genuine issue, authorities would absolutely not permit it. Improved internet speed brings no risks at all.
Y
Yoshishrimp
06-15-2021, 03:57 PM #6

If this were a genuine issue, authorities would absolutely not permit it. Improved internet speed brings no risks at all.

S
Streiyn
Posting Freak
768
06-17-2021, 12:51 PM
#7
I concur because 5G will take a few years to develop as phones and data plans become more affordable.
S
Streiyn
06-17-2021, 12:51 PM #7

I concur because 5G will take a few years to develop as phones and data plans become more affordable.

T
TVtrollll69
Junior Member
38
06-18-2021, 05:02 AM
#8
I understand, there should be a third choice as well. I’m not opposed to 5G, but I won’t buy a phone solely for its 5G capability. Since reliable 4G isn’t available in many areas, I don’t think it’s worth spending a lot on an expensive 5G device that wouldn’t offer real value.
T
TVtrollll69
06-18-2021, 05:02 AM #8

I understand, there should be a third choice as well. I’m not opposed to 5G, but I won’t buy a phone solely for its 5G capability. Since reliable 4G isn’t available in many areas, I don’t think it’s worth spending a lot on an expensive 5G device that wouldn’t offer real value.

S
Stunflix
Member
174
06-18-2021, 05:11 AM
#9
I don't believe anyone on this forum opposes it. The people online against it probably never completed high school or didn't pass science. It's non-ionizing "radiation," meaning it doesn't impact your cells in any way—good or bad. Like FM radio or WiFi, it's still non-ionizing. No matter how high 5G is on the electromagnetic spectrum, it remains non-ionizing. But those who don't understand see "radiation" and panic, which is why I say they didn't pass science. Then they take small details and distort the meaning to match their views.
S
Stunflix
06-18-2021, 05:11 AM #9

I don't believe anyone on this forum opposes it. The people online against it probably never completed high school or didn't pass science. It's non-ionizing "radiation," meaning it doesn't impact your cells in any way—good or bad. Like FM radio or WiFi, it's still non-ionizing. No matter how high 5G is on the electromagnetic spectrum, it remains non-ionizing. But those who don't understand see "radiation" and panic, which is why I say they didn't pass science. Then they take small details and distort the meaning to match their views.

K
kcristan
Senior Member
514
06-26-2021, 05:00 AM
#10
It's accurate that intense energy can damage your skin, especially with powerful devices. Consider the size of a microwave and the power required to cook food. The Inverse Square Law explains why real risks from towers like 4g and 5g are minimal. The FCC allows up to 500 watts per channel, but most urban and suburban towers operate at 100 watts or less. Over roughly 10 inches, that translates to about 1 watt of energy.
K
kcristan
06-26-2021, 05:00 AM #10

It's accurate that intense energy can damage your skin, especially with powerful devices. Consider the size of a microwave and the power required to cook food. The Inverse Square Law explains why real risks from towers like 4g and 5g are minimal. The FCC allows up to 500 watts per channel, but most urban and suburban towers operate at 100 watts or less. Over roughly 10 inches, that translates to about 1 watt of energy.

Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next