F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking 5820k Overclocking 4.7 ghz

5820k Overclocking 4.7 ghz

5820k Overclocking 4.7 ghz

A
Amegahoney
Posting Freak
789
08-01-2016, 06:10 AM
#1
Hi! I've boosted my 5820k to 4.5 ghz with a voltage just under 1.3 and it's very stable, but I'm stuck at that speed even with lower voltages under 1.3. My temps are low on the Hackintosh, only around 50 on big builds. There seems to be an option on the X99 board to allow higher voltages than 1.3—would you think I could try that and aim for something like 1.35 with 4.7 ghz? Or am I risking damage? I have a notcua nh-d15 fan and see others on Geekbench using similar CPUs reaching over 5ghz.
A
Amegahoney
08-01-2016, 06:10 AM #1

Hi! I've boosted my 5820k to 4.5 ghz with a voltage just under 1.3 and it's very stable, but I'm stuck at that speed even with lower voltages under 1.3. My temps are low on the Hackintosh, only around 50 on big builds. There seems to be an option on the X99 board to allow higher voltages than 1.3—would you think I could try that and aim for something like 1.35 with 4.7 ghz? Or am I risking damage? I have a notcua nh-d15 fan and see others on Geekbench using similar CPUs reaching over 5ghz.

N
Naruto1813
Junior Member
15
08-05-2016, 10:48 AM
#2
Just because they're reaching it and can validate doesn't mean it's stable or that it isn't causing damage and shortening the life of the CPU or creating tiny errors that may eventually create problems with written data. I wouldn't go past the 4.5Ghz you're already at. That's a very respectable overclock at 1.2Ghz faster than stock. There's a reason they have a limit switch to the voltage and if you go beyond that you are taking the life of your hardware into your own hands. For some people that's not a consideration, they can afford to just grab another piece of hardware if something happens, so if that's you, great, if not, be happy with the giant overclock you already have.
Have you run Prime on small FFTs for 24hrs to verify your...
N
Naruto1813
08-05-2016, 10:48 AM #2

Just because they're reaching it and can validate doesn't mean it's stable or that it isn't causing damage and shortening the life of the CPU or creating tiny errors that may eventually create problems with written data. I wouldn't go past the 4.5Ghz you're already at. That's a very respectable overclock at 1.2Ghz faster than stock. There's a reason they have a limit switch to the voltage and if you go beyond that you are taking the life of your hardware into your own hands. For some people that's not a consideration, they can afford to just grab another piece of hardware if something happens, so if that's you, great, if not, be happy with the giant overclock you already have.
Have you run Prime on small FFTs for 24hrs to verify your...

A
AthenasLight
Posting Freak
781
08-05-2016, 11:13 AM
#3
Just because they're reaching it and can validate doesn't mean it's stable or that it isn't causing damage and shortening the life of the CPU or creating tiny errors that may eventually create problems with written data. I wouldn't go past the 4.5Ghz you're already at. That's a very respectable overclock at 1.2Ghz faster than stock. There's a reason they have a limit switch to the voltage and if you go beyond that you are taking the life of your hardware into your own hands. For some people that's not a consideration, they can afford to just grab another piece of hardware if something happens, so if that's you, great, if not, be happy with the giant overclock you already have.
Have you run Prime on small FFTs for 24hrs to verify your overclock ACTUALLY is relatively stable?
A
AthenasLight
08-05-2016, 11:13 AM #3

Just because they're reaching it and can validate doesn't mean it's stable or that it isn't causing damage and shortening the life of the CPU or creating tiny errors that may eventually create problems with written data. I wouldn't go past the 4.5Ghz you're already at. That's a very respectable overclock at 1.2Ghz faster than stock. There's a reason they have a limit switch to the voltage and if you go beyond that you are taking the life of your hardware into your own hands. For some people that's not a consideration, they can afford to just grab another piece of hardware if something happens, so if that's you, great, if not, be happy with the giant overclock you already have.
Have you run Prime on small FFTs for 24hrs to verify your overclock ACTUALLY is relatively stable?

T
The_D3mon
Senior Member
694
08-20-2016, 04:47 AM
#4
Thank you for your responses! I won't be overclocking anymore—it's just wishful thinking!
T
The_D3mon
08-20-2016, 04:47 AM #4

Thank you for your responses! I won't be overclocking anymore—it's just wishful thinking!

D
DrinkMoreMilk
Junior Member
43
08-20-2016, 04:54 AM
#5
Overclocking is acceptable, it's fine even, and likely helpful if done moderately. Exceeding a 130% increase can lead to problems.
3.5Ghz x 130% equals 4.55Ghz, or in your scenario 3.3Ghz x 130% equals 4.3Ghz.
D
DrinkMoreMilk
08-20-2016, 04:54 AM #5

Overclocking is acceptable, it's fine even, and likely helpful if done moderately. Exceeding a 130% increase can lead to problems.
3.5Ghz x 130% equals 4.55Ghz, or in your scenario 3.3Ghz x 130% equals 4.3Ghz.

S
Sertero28
Senior Member
589
08-20-2016, 07:55 AM
#6
@darkbreeze, your understanding is right. It's already an impressive original concept. If you aim for 4.5Ghz, I have an i7 5820k that works well on that setup and it's been stable for several months now. I also tried a X99 with a Mobo and a CPU ratio of 45, running at 1.3V.
S
Sertero28
08-20-2016, 07:55 AM #6

@darkbreeze, your understanding is right. It's already an impressive original concept. If you aim for 4.5Ghz, I have an i7 5820k that works well on that setup and it's been stable for several months now. I also tried a X99 with a Mobo and a CPU ratio of 45, running at 1.3V.

M
megathiurum
Junior Member
27
08-20-2016, 04:47 PM
#7
Please refrain from replying to outdated threads. Thank you!
M
megathiurum
08-20-2016, 04:47 PM #7

Please refrain from replying to outdated threads. Thank you!