F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop 5,000 megawatts of RISC-V processor power...

5,000 megawatts of RISC-V processor power...

5,000 megawatts of RISC-V processor power...

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
S
65
06-03-2023, 11:51 PM
#1
While browsing the news on my phone, I found out that Micro Magic has created a RISC-V 64-bit chip with a clock speed of 5GHz, as reported here: https://www.eenewseurope.com/news/worlds...5ghz-speed. It runs at 1.1v and works without liquid cooling.
S
SUPERSPIDERBOB
06-03-2023, 11:51 PM #1

While browsing the news on my phone, I found out that Micro Magic has created a RISC-V 64-bit chip with a clock speed of 5GHz, as reported here: https://www.eenewseurope.com/news/worlds...5ghz-speed. It runs at 1.1v and works without liquid cooling.

O
oobaileyx
Member
209
06-09-2023, 01:16 AM
#2
It's not very impressive, speed alone doesn't matter if the performance per instruction is low. The CPU you mentioned reaches a core count of 13,000. For context, the Ryzen 7 1700X hits 309,792. It's certainly a solid result but not extraordinary.
O
oobaileyx
06-09-2023, 01:16 AM #2

It's not very impressive, speed alone doesn't matter if the performance per instruction is low. The CPU you mentioned reaches a core count of 13,000. For context, the Ryzen 7 1700X hits 309,792. It's certainly a solid result but not extraordinary.

M
Mastera616
Member
163
06-27-2023, 05:24 PM
#3
I was curious about the real performance. Still, having clocks that high at just 1.1 volts isn’t something to mock. But the article doesn’t mention the number of cores or whether it uses SMT.
M
Mastera616
06-27-2023, 05:24 PM #3

I was curious about the real performance. Still, having clocks that high at just 1.1 volts isn’t something to mock. But the article doesn’t mention the number of cores or whether it uses SMT.

C
CRAZYMAN4590
Member
164
06-27-2023, 11:35 PM
#4
The evaluation suggests it's likely a single or dual-core processor.
C
CRAZYMAN4590
06-27-2023, 11:35 PM #4

The evaluation suggests it's likely a single or dual-core processor.

I
iDroyde
Junior Member
13
06-29-2023, 07:54 AM
#5
Designers across most organizations have quickly realized their mistakes following Intel and Netburst's setbacks (Intel aimed for 5GHz). Note: Intel targeted 5GHz performance with less than 1V by 2005: https://www.anandtech.com/show/680/6
I
iDroyde
06-29-2023, 07:54 AM #5

Designers across most organizations have quickly realized their mistakes following Intel and Netburst's setbacks (Intel aimed for 5GHz). Note: Intel targeted 5GHz performance with less than 1V by 2005: https://www.anandtech.com/show/680/6

R
Romy05
Junior Member
11
06-29-2023, 01:27 PM
#6
They aimed for 10GHz at under 1V. The design process used 7nm technology up until 2005, and they remain working with 14nm or newer today.
R
Romy05
06-29-2023, 01:27 PM #6

They aimed for 10GHz at under 1V. The design process used 7nm technology up until 2005, and they remain working with 14nm or newer today.

V
Vicho_Op
Member
218
06-29-2023, 06:20 PM
#7
Netburst together with IA-64 proved to be total failures. The Pentium4 ran slower and generated more heat than its predecessor, the Pentium III. AMD Athlon chips were also problematic. Essentially, everything aimed only to push 64-bit RISC processors into server and workstation spaces.
V
Vicho_Op
06-29-2023, 06:20 PM #7

Netburst together with IA-64 proved to be total failures. The Pentium4 ran slower and generated more heat than its predecessor, the Pentium III. AMD Athlon chips were also problematic. Essentially, everything aimed only to push 64-bit RISC processors into server and workstation spaces.

A
AuTPaci
Junior Member
5
06-29-2023, 06:37 PM
#8
I have a perspective here, don't you?
A
AuTPaci
06-29-2023, 06:37 PM #8

I have a perspective here, don't you?

E
ExlonTrantos
Member
215
06-29-2023, 08:38 PM
#9
Yes, that's correct.
E
ExlonTrantos
06-29-2023, 08:38 PM #9

Yes, that's correct.

M
MrScooter2
Member
198
06-30-2023, 02:13 AM
#10
remarkable though I didn't enjoy pushing CPUs above 4.3ghz, yet for RISC there could be improved reliability
M
MrScooter2
06-30-2023, 02:13 AM #10

remarkable though I didn't enjoy pushing CPUs above 4.3ghz, yet for RISC there could be improved reliability

Pages (2): 1 2 Next