3d mark cpu score
3d mark cpu score
Hello, with AMD's improvements in the CPU lineup featuring Ryzen 3rd generation, it's hard to predict exactly when an AMD processor might reach the top 10 or even join the 3DMark Hall of Fame. While there are strong contenders like the Ryzen 3900X and 3950X in the top 80, historically the top 10 has leaned toward Intel's Xeon W-3175X or i9 9980XE. AMD's higher overclocking potential and better IPC could give them an edge in this space.
In 3D Mark, the 3990x shows lower performance compared to the 3950X, likely due to IPC differences. Both results highlight the top time for the CPU, though their GPU capabilities vary—especially with the RTX 2080 Ti cards having distinct clock speeds.
They seem to be both LN2 outcomes. Possibly 3Dmark doesn't reach that scale. Core counts aside, what are your thoughts?
Numerous factors influence the results, making it complex to pinpoint exact differences. With 16 threads compared to 64, scaling isn't optimal beyond around 8-12 depending on system behavior. Enabling core parking might hurt performance due to lag times. The benchmark relies heavily on IPC and clock speed. Without full overclock details, it's hard to compare systems directly. Differences likely stem from GPU drivers, memory speeds, timings, and other settings. These are just some aspects to consider.
Windows's thread scheduler might cause issues by handling too many cores, leading to unnecessary task swapping and wasted effort.
Also observe the 3950X rig was set to disable Simultaneous Multithreading. 16c16t. This attempt aimed to get the best possible score in my view. The other submission came from someone using a standard gaming rig and provided a benchmark. It's quite disappointing for fair comparisons.