F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking 2x GPU & CPU In same loop?

2x GPU & CPU In same loop?

2x GPU & CPU In same loop?

H
HunterZod
Junior Member
5
10-30-2016, 03:25 AM
#1
Hello everyone, I'm planning to assemble a new watercooled PC with a custom loop. I'm wondering whether to include everything in one loop or create separate loops for the CPU and GPU. I intend to overclock the i7-6700k CPU and two GTX 1080 SLI GPUs, which are the components I expect to use.
H
HunterZod
10-30-2016, 03:25 AM #1

Hello everyone, I'm planning to assemble a new watercooled PC with a custom loop. I'm wondering whether to include everything in one loop or create separate loops for the CPU and GPU. I intend to overclock the i7-6700k CPU and two GTX 1080 SLI GPUs, which are the components I expect to use.

K
Kay123_
Senior Member
368
10-30-2016, 10:21 PM
#2
You have flexibility in your setup, as it doesn't greatly affect the number of radiators required.
Your situation provides good choices, allowing you to easily add two loops if needed for appearance.
If not, simply use a strong pump and fill it up—remember, RADs between units can assist, though dual-res/pumps are also an option. One loop remains a viable alternative.
K
Kay123_
10-30-2016, 10:21 PM #2

You have flexibility in your setup, as it doesn't greatly affect the number of radiators required.
Your situation provides good choices, allowing you to easily add two loops if needed for appearance.
If not, simply use a strong pump and fill it up—remember, RADs between units can assist, though dual-res/pumps are also an option. One loop remains a viable alternative.

J
jlien11
Senior Member
253
10-31-2016, 01:17 AM
#3
It depends on personal preference. Many people use the same setup, but if I were you, I'd choose the parallel configuration. This would lower your water temperatures and boost cooling, helping prevent overheating. You could also try using two radiators (which you have) to keep the CPU cool, then move to the GPU, and repeat. The decision is yours.
J
jlien11
10-31-2016, 01:17 AM #3

It depends on personal preference. Many people use the same setup, but if I were you, I'd choose the parallel configuration. This would lower your water temperatures and boost cooling, helping prevent overheating. You could also try using two radiators (which you have) to keep the CPU cool, then move to the GPU, and repeat. The decision is yours.

D
Dagora_
Junior Member
14
10-31-2016, 02:55 AM
#4
You have flexibility in your setup, as it doesn't greatly affect the number of radiators required.
Your situation provides good choices, allowing you to easily add two loops if needed for appearance.
If not, simply use a strong pump and fill it up—remember, RADs between units can assist, though dual-res/pumps are also an option. One loop remains a viable alternative.
D
Dagora_
10-31-2016, 02:55 AM #4

You have flexibility in your setup, as it doesn't greatly affect the number of radiators required.
Your situation provides good choices, allowing you to easily add two loops if needed for appearance.
If not, simply use a strong pump and fill it up—remember, RADs between units can assist, though dual-res/pumps are also an option. One loop remains a viable alternative.

P
51
10-31-2016, 04:13 AM
#5
It depends on how much effort you're willing to invest. Dual loops require more work, but they simplify things. I've tested both and noticed a temperature difference of 5-10 degrees Celsius between the two setups. My approach uses a single loop with alternating rads between CPU and GPU. The choice is ultimately yours.
P
PrincessMischa
10-31-2016, 04:13 AM #5

It depends on how much effort you're willing to invest. Dual loops require more work, but they simplify things. I've tested both and noticed a temperature difference of 5-10 degrees Celsius between the two setups. My approach uses a single loop with alternating rads between CPU and GPU. The choice is ultimately yours.