2.5 or 10 gig router that doesn't use Wi-Fi
2.5 or 10 gig router that doesn't use Wi-Fi
Hello, I understand you're seeking advice from experts regarding your networking setup. Many have upgraded to AM5 with 2.5Gb LAN and are considering similar upgrades for their Synology box. You're exploring options for a compact router with a 2.5Gb switch, as most available models only support 2.5Gb on the WAN port. Your interest in a non-WiFi router is valid given your poor Wi-Fi coverage in the network closet. There are products that offer both switching and routing functions without relying on Wi-Fi, which could be a better fit for your needs. I recommend looking into dedicated access points or separate routers to avoid unnecessary complexity.
Some routers now include both 2.5 GbE WAN and LAN ports. With the arrival of Wi-Fi 6E and 7, this setup is becoming more popular among premium devices. The most straightforward option might be a pfSense appliance. You can either design your own or purchase one from Netgate, which provides models supporting both 2.5 GbE and 10 GbE. These ports can be utilized for various purposes. I built my own using a dual NIC device and connected it to a 2.5 GbE managed switch, then simply used access points as needed.
Modern LAN connections offer quicker data transfer, which often leads to increased energy use. Be aware of this when planning your setup. Many small multi-gig network devices get reviewed on platforms like ServeTheHome (check their YT channel or website) for insights into power usage and energy-saving hardware options. You can typically run pfSense or OPNsense on routers, but verify compatibility before installing.
Maybe you're considering full-size PCs. If you opt for something like a real Netgate device, your power consumption would be lower than a top-of-the-line router needed for 2.5 GbE connectivity. Not my preference, but many users rely on compact Chinese units that use less energy. I'm running a solid Intel NUC, though their smaller models still manage to save power. Pfsense doesn't demand much processing power. I believe the actual energy usage could be significantly reduced if you select appropriate hardware.
I'm not familiar with Netgate, but I'd need to check if your device supports expansion cards.
I purchased a NUC equipped with a dual NIC built-in. Others have tried using USB adapters or different setups, but I don’t suggest that approach. The NUC comes with an expansion module containing the second NIC, though it’s not available for purchase separately from the official product. Based on my research, you’ll need to buy the full unit together. Once installed, you can run PFSense as usual—it’s a simple process. My NUC is mounted on top of my network rack and connects directly to the switch.
I believe you'd like information about QNAP routers, specifically the QHORA series. Here are some relevant links:
https://www.qnap.com/en-us/product/qhora-321
https://www.qnap.com/en-us/product/qhora-322
All choices seem acceptable, though they might be costly. I’ll need to consider it further. It’s great that there are options available.
You don’t require a 2.5 gig router unless your connection exceeds gigabit capacity. A 2.5 gb switch suffices. I’d opt for one with PoE to energize your access points. I rely on Ubiquiti switches and APs, and they’ve performed exceptionally well. For a router offering 2.5gb, consider PFSSense or the Ubiquiti Dream Machine Pro Special Edition, connected to another 2.5gb switch through an SFPS+ port—since it lacks a dedicated 2.5gb Ethernet interface. Negate is the company behind PFSSense, which provides routers tailored for all speeds and types.