F5F Stay Refreshed Software PC Gaming 200fps in Minecraft enhances smooth gameplay with faster frame rates.

200fps in Minecraft enhances smooth gameplay with faster frame rates.

200fps in Minecraft enhances smooth gameplay with faster frame rates.

M
maestrowilldo
Member
142
05-08-2020, 10:22 PM
#1
Hey there! I recently assembled a PC with an i9 9900K and 16GB of 3600MHz RAM. Since I’ll be using integrated graphics, I’m expecting the 3080 next year. In the meantime, I thought Minecraft would be a good fit because it’s known for being CPU-heavy. But when I started, I only managed about 200fps. For comparison, people with weaker setups but better GPUs often hit 600-1000fps in videos. Are you seeing this slowdown? Did I miss something like overclocking the CPU to 5GHz or adjusting the frame rate? Also, did you enable 80% of the integrated graphics?
M
maestrowilldo
05-08-2020, 10:22 PM #1

Hey there! I recently assembled a PC with an i9 9900K and 16GB of 3600MHz RAM. Since I’ll be using integrated graphics, I’m expecting the 3080 next year. In the meantime, I thought Minecraft would be a good fit because it’s known for being CPU-heavy. But when I started, I only managed about 200fps. For comparison, people with weaker setups but better GPUs often hit 600-1000fps in videos. Are you seeing this slowdown? Did I miss something like overclocking the CPU to 5GHz or adjusting the frame rate? Also, did you enable 80% of the integrated graphics?

L
lachlanleung99
Junior Member
15
05-10-2020, 10:38 PM
#2
They're likely testing performance with a high-end setup like an i9 10900k at 99.999 GHz and an RTX 3090 with LN2 cooling. It seems this configuration might only work during the loading screen. Make sure your GPU is properly selected in GeForce Controls.
L
lachlanleung99
05-10-2020, 10:38 PM #2

They're likely testing performance with a high-end setup like an i9 10900k at 99.999 GHz and an RTX 3090 with LN2 cooling. It seems this configuration might only work during the loading screen. Make sure your GPU is properly selected in GeForce Controls.

P
pegasusXman
Member
194
05-26-2020, 03:02 PM
#3
they don't have one, I'd say 200fps is likely the maximum for the iGPU. I don't know much more.
P
pegasusXman
05-26-2020, 03:02 PM #3

they don't have one, I'd say 200fps is likely the maximum for the iGPU. I don't know much more.

C
Ciera7
Member
225
05-26-2020, 08:45 PM
#4
I’m having trouble seeing. I need to visit the nearby kindergarten again.
C
Ciera7
05-26-2020, 08:45 PM #4

I’m having trouble seeing. I need to visit the nearby kindergarten again.

W
Wools_
Junior Member
3
05-27-2020, 12:01 AM
#5
Which monitor are you using? 60Hz?
W
Wools_
05-27-2020, 12:01 AM #5

Which monitor are you using? 60Hz?

P
PsychoPugx
Member
210
06-05-2020, 01:41 PM
#6
Use OptiFine for older releases like 1.8 and 1.12. Sodium works well with newer versions such as 1.16. Aim for around 200 fps with integrated graphics.
P
PsychoPugx
06-05-2020, 01:41 PM #6

Use OptiFine for older releases like 1.8 and 1.12. Sodium works well with newer versions such as 1.16. Aim for around 200 fps with integrated graphics.

G
GamenMetLeviNL
Senior Member
638
06-09-2020, 07:31 PM
#7
Sorry, but why would anyone require more than 200fps? It’s hard to tell the difference between 200 and 250, or even 200 and 300. In Minecraft, 600fps isn’t essential since 200 is more than sufficient. Can the human eye really spot such high frame rates? Once you move from 30 to 60, it’s clear—60 to 100 is even more apparent. But is it really noticeable and worth the extra time, effort, or cost to reach those higher frames when the difference between 200 and 300, or 400, or 600 is already obvious?
G
GamenMetLeviNL
06-09-2020, 07:31 PM #7

Sorry, but why would anyone require more than 200fps? It’s hard to tell the difference between 200 and 250, or even 200 and 300. In Minecraft, 600fps isn’t essential since 200 is more than sufficient. Can the human eye really spot such high frame rates? Once you move from 30 to 60, it’s clear—60 to 100 is even more apparent. But is it really noticeable and worth the extra time, effort, or cost to reach those higher frames when the difference between 200 and 300, or 400, or 600 is already obvious?