F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop 1977 Cinebench R15 at 4.35 GHz with all cores, 3200 MHz RAM, and 16GB memory slots.

1977 Cinebench R15 at 4.35 GHz with all cores, 3200 MHz RAM, and 16GB memory slots.

1977 Cinebench R15 at 4.35 GHz with all cores, 3200 MHz RAM, and 16GB memory slots.

P
perfectpoint
Junior Member
3
02-06-2016, 05:27 AM
#1
Title lol
P
perfectpoint
02-06-2016, 05:27 AM #1

Title lol

M
marmonar
Member
82
02-12-2016, 09:24 PM
#2
It's surprising that such a high score was reached with the 7 2700x at 1977 on Cinebench R15. It seems the i7 9700K OC with all cores performed better than expected.
M
marmonar
02-12-2016, 09:24 PM #2

It's surprising that such a high score was reached with the 7 2700x at 1977 on Cinebench R15. It seems the i7 9700K OC with all cores performed better than expected.

M
MLGFly
Junior Member
36
02-15-2016, 02:40 PM
#3
Sure thing... If I had increased the voltage, I could have reached 4.4 GHz easily, but I didn’t want to mess up my setup, so I limited testing to 2-3 hours before returning to 4 GHz at 1.18 Volts with the LLC 4. It’s actually interesting that I got a better score—it’s true, and I did record it.
M
MLGFly
02-15-2016, 02:40 PM #3

Sure thing... If I had increased the voltage, I could have reached 4.4 GHz easily, but I didn’t want to mess up my setup, so I limited testing to 2-3 hours before returning to 4 GHz at 1.18 Volts with the LLC 4. It’s actually interesting that I got a better score—it’s true, and I did record it.

L
lemur68
Junior Member
14
02-15-2016, 04:56 PM
#4
This outcome aligns with what one would anticipate based on SMT/HT scaling.
L
lemur68
02-15-2016, 04:56 PM #4

This outcome aligns with what one would anticipate based on SMT/HT scaling.

F
FuzzyMug
Senior Member
476
02-15-2016, 06:54 PM
#5
Thread already locked. Suggested alternative: Provide a detailed status update for better engagement.
F
FuzzyMug
02-15-2016, 06:54 PM #5

Thread already locked. Suggested alternative: Provide a detailed status update for better engagement.