F5F Stay Refreshed Software PC Gaming 1840 to 1150 resolution versus 1920 to 1080 resolution

1840 to 1150 resolution versus 1920 to 1080 resolution

1840 to 1150 resolution versus 1920 to 1080 resolution

J
julian_05
Member
185
01-09-2016, 03:36 PM
#1
Check your performance at both resolutions to see the difference.
J
julian_05
01-09-2016, 03:36 PM #1

Check your performance at both resolutions to see the difference.

M
Moritz0702
Member
103
01-10-2016, 08:41 PM
#2
Lower quality settings usually mean better performance. I’d prefer FHD 1080p over anything else.
M
Moritz0702
01-10-2016, 08:41 PM #2

Lower quality settings usually mean better performance. I’d prefer FHD 1080p over anything else.

T
tamemarco
Senior Member
482
01-26-2016, 03:23 AM
#3
Absolutely, scaling at uncommon resolutions can affect visuals. Doing the calculations shows only a minor change—around 2% in pixels—which likely won’t noticeably impact performance.
T
tamemarco
01-26-2016, 03:23 AM #3

Absolutely, scaling at uncommon resolutions can affect visuals. Doing the calculations shows only a minor change—around 2% in pixels—which likely won’t noticeably impact performance.

B
Begga_Zockt
Junior Member
49
01-26-2016, 10:59 AM
#4
Are you referring to 1680x1050 instead? If so, the numbers suggest around 2,116,000 pixels versus 2,073,600 for 1920x1080. Generally, fewer pixels mean more frames per second, so 1080p could be preferable. In reality, 1920x1080 is also a 16:9 format, and many games are tuned for that aspect ratio to keep consistent FPS—adjustments are made in maps or levels to fit the frame size while maintaining performance.
B
Begga_Zockt
01-26-2016, 10:59 AM #4

Are you referring to 1680x1050 instead? If so, the numbers suggest around 2,116,000 pixels versus 2,073,600 for 1920x1080. Generally, fewer pixels mean more frames per second, so 1080p could be preferable. In reality, 1920x1080 is also a 16:9 format, and many games are tuned for that aspect ratio to keep consistent FPS—adjustments are made in maps or levels to fit the frame size while maintaining performance.

U
undead_mcgill
Member
108
01-27-2016, 01:55 PM
#5
The dimensions would be resized to fit a 16:9 screen, as the actual ratio is 16:10 (8:5).
U
undead_mcgill
01-27-2016, 01:55 PM #5

The dimensions would be resized to fit a 16:9 screen, as the actual ratio is 16:10 (8:5).

I
ISweet76
Junior Member
4
01-28-2016, 10:54 PM
#6
In fact, I should maintain the same frame rate as 1920 by 1080.
I
ISweet76
01-28-2016, 10:54 PM #6

In fact, I should maintain the same frame rate as 1920 by 1080.

A
Alba16
Junior Member
1
01-29-2016, 01:30 AM
#7
This means performance drops noticeably at higher resolutions, especially noticeable when comparing 1840x1150 to 1920x1080. The pixel count difference is significant, with a total of around 2.1 million versus 2.07 million pixels.
A
Alba16
01-29-2016, 01:30 AM #7

This means performance drops noticeably at higher resolutions, especially noticeable when comparing 1840x1150 to 1920x1080. The pixel count difference is significant, with a total of around 2.1 million versus 2.07 million pixels.

D
Dyriver
Member
145
01-30-2016, 03:42 PM
#8
Kkk
D
Dyriver
01-30-2016, 03:42 PM #8

Kkk

G
gaLact1cfLea
Member
194
01-30-2016, 10:05 PM
#9
Maintaining a frame rate of 1920 by 1080 when playing at 1840 by 1150 would be ideal.
G
gaLact1cfLea
01-30-2016, 10:05 PM #9

Maintaining a frame rate of 1920 by 1080 when playing at 1840 by 1150 would be ideal.

A
alexBV
Junior Member
48
01-31-2016, 04:06 AM
#10
I recommend maintaining a similar frame rate, since the resolution variation seems only minor.
A
alexBV
01-31-2016, 04:06 AM #10

I recommend maintaining a similar frame rate, since the resolution variation seems only minor.