F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking 1.45 V 4.0 GHz Ryzen

1.45 V 4.0 GHz Ryzen

1.45 V 4.0 GHz Ryzen

B
BaccaStrq123
Senior Member
664
06-27-2017, 05:49 AM
#1
I got the new cooler yesterday, model 3, and it works well at 1.45 V and 4 GHz with temperatures stable. It might fail during the Intel Burst test, but I played SCUM for five hours without overheating, staying below 70°C. I'm using a Ryzen 5 1600X and an ASRock AB350M-Pro4 motherboard with the 3 cooler. Can someone confirm if this setup is safe or if there are risks?
B
BaccaStrq123
06-27-2017, 05:49 AM #1

I got the new cooler yesterday, model 3, and it works well at 1.45 V and 4 GHz with temperatures stable. It might fail during the Intel Burst test, but I played SCUM for five hours without overheating, staying below 70°C. I'm using a Ryzen 5 1600X and an ASRock AB350M-Pro4 motherboard with the 3 cooler. Can someone confirm if this setup is safe or if there are risks?

E
Eduardo_GameOn
Posting Freak
921
06-27-2017, 06:22 AM
#2
It's not advised to exceed 1.40v even when temperatures are fine.
If it fails during stress tests, it indicates instability, causing random crashes and potential corruption of the system.
I would advise against it but remember this is your setup—decide whether you're comfortable with the risks to keep going.
The GPU plays a much bigger role in performance.
E
Eduardo_GameOn
06-27-2017, 06:22 AM #2

It's not advised to exceed 1.40v even when temperatures are fine.
If it fails during stress tests, it indicates instability, causing random crashes and potential corruption of the system.
I would advise against it but remember this is your setup—decide whether you're comfortable with the risks to keep going.
The GPU plays a much bigger role in performance.

O
OmqDace
Posting Freak
798
06-27-2017, 07:16 AM
#3
The reason for needing a 4GHz overclock is unclear. It's likely you'll experience similar performance drops afterward. Overclocking a CPU can be more beneficial in the long run, especially considering its higher usage percentage. You might be able to maintain the original settings, but it's not advised.
O
OmqDace
06-27-2017, 07:16 AM #3

The reason for needing a 4GHz overclock is unclear. It's likely you'll experience similar performance drops afterward. Overclocking a CPU can be more beneficial in the long run, especially considering its higher usage percentage. You might be able to maintain the original settings, but it's not advised.

A
aidenp11
Junior Member
3
06-27-2017, 08:13 AM
#4
1.45v exceeds the suggested level for regular use; it's better to cap at 1.40v for daily overclocking to avoid potential CPU wear, even with acceptable temperatures. Hope this helps!
A
aidenp11
06-27-2017, 08:13 AM #4

1.45v exceeds the suggested level for regular use; it's better to cap at 1.40v for daily overclocking to avoid potential CPU wear, even with acceptable temperatures. Hope this helps!

D
diana02501
Member
99
07-03-2017, 04:45 AM
#5
It's not advised to exceed 1.40v even when temperatures are fine.
If it fails during stress tests, it indicates instability, causing random crashes and potential corruption of the system.
I would advise against it but remember this is your setup—decide whether you're comfortable with the risks to keep going.
The GPU plays a much bigger role in performance.
D
diana02501
07-03-2017, 04:45 AM #5

It's not advised to exceed 1.40v even when temperatures are fine.
If it fails during stress tests, it indicates instability, causing random crashes and potential corruption of the system.
I would advise against it but remember this is your setup—decide whether you're comfortable with the risks to keep going.
The GPU plays a much bigger role in performance.

C
CookieStars
Member
220
07-05-2017, 02:54 AM
#6
Sure, it worked at 1.375 V and 3.8 GHz.
C
CookieStars
07-05-2017, 02:54 AM #6

Sure, it worked at 1.375 V and 3.8 GHz.