F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop 10900K...Purchase or skip? :-/

10900K...Purchase or skip? :-/

10900K...Purchase or skip? :-/

Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next
C
coyote888
Posting Freak
838
06-01-2020, 04:41 AM
#1
I don't feel much impressed. Adding two more cores and four more threads doesn't really boost performance noticeably, especially with that constant stream of "Up to" Marketing. I was counting on this to give the 3900x genuine competition, but instead we ended up with another power-hungry chip built on old technology. Just my take. If anyone has better ideas, at least let me know...
C
coyote888
06-01-2020, 04:41 AM #1

I don't feel much impressed. Adding two more cores and four more threads doesn't really boost performance noticeably, especially with that constant stream of "Up to" Marketing. I was counting on this to give the 3900x genuine competition, but instead we ended up with another power-hungry chip built on old technology. Just my take. If anyone has better ideas, at least let me know...

S
SmellingSavage
Junior Member
3
06-01-2020, 07:46 AM
#2
They weren't released until May 20, 2020...so...not sure what to think
S
SmellingSavage
06-01-2020, 07:46 AM #2

They weren't released until May 20, 2020...so...not sure what to think

F
Frinex10
Posting Freak
806
06-01-2020, 11:03 AM
#3
we don’t have one clear measure of performance, we choose purchases based on how they work in real situations.
F
Frinex10
06-01-2020, 11:03 AM #3

we don’t have one clear measure of performance, we choose purchases based on how they work in real situations.

K
kat232kat
Junior Member
3
06-01-2020, 04:25 PM
#4
It's a more affordable option compared to the 9900K, though it seems unlikely anyone would have purchased the 9900K in the first place. Considering the powerful cooler you'll need, this new model doesn't seem like a good choice. I'm looking forward to seeing independent benchmarks and power consumption data. A 300W under load result wouldn't be unexpected.
K
kat232kat
06-01-2020, 04:25 PM #4

It's a more affordable option compared to the 9900K, though it seems unlikely anyone would have purchased the 9900K in the first place. Considering the powerful cooler you'll need, this new model doesn't seem like a good choice. I'm looking forward to seeing independent benchmarks and power consumption data. A 300W under load result wouldn't be unexpected.

N
NinjaBear007
Member
108
06-01-2020, 05:43 PM
#5
I understand, but I probably wouldn’t be interested even if I could. I’m looking for genuine rivalry. Intel should push harder.
N
NinjaBear007
06-01-2020, 05:43 PM #5

I understand, but I probably wouldn’t be interested even if I could. I’m looking for genuine rivalry. Intel should push harder.

M
minibiquetteol
Junior Member
15
06-04-2020, 09:45 AM
#6
Currently, the main challenge revolves around AMD struggling to keep up. According to reports, Zen 3’s launch in September should offer significant improvements over Zen 2, such as faster clock speeds and improved performance per instruction, even though the number of cores won’t change.
M
minibiquetteol
06-04-2020, 09:45 AM #6

Currently, the main challenge revolves around AMD struggling to keep up. According to reports, Zen 3’s launch in September should offer significant improvements over Zen 2, such as faster clock speeds and improved performance per instruction, even though the number of cores won’t change.

J
JIMBOWz
Member
236
06-04-2020, 10:01 AM
#7
The only standout model is the i7-10700KF, though its appeal fades if AMD lowers the 3700X price to $249 or the 3900X to $299.
J
JIMBOWz
06-04-2020, 10:01 AM #7

The only standout model is the i7-10700KF, though its appeal fades if AMD lowers the 3700X price to $249 or the 3900X to $299.

X
xazam1108
Junior Member
42
06-04-2020, 02:09 PM
#8
Is the 14nm technology still viable? It’s a hot topic!
X
xazam1108
06-04-2020, 02:09 PM #8

Is the 14nm technology still viable? It’s a hot topic!

A
AmazinglyCool
Senior Member
695
06-09-2020, 12:18 AM
#9
TDP stands at 125W, and there was a discussion about it yesterday. Meanwhile, the 9900K’s “95W” likely translates to around 175W, which suggests this value should fall closer to 225W.
A
AmazinglyCool
06-09-2020, 12:18 AM #9

TDP stands at 125W, and there was a discussion about it yesterday. Meanwhile, the 9900K’s “95W” likely translates to around 175W, which suggests this value should fall closer to 225W.

B
bengalwatcher
Posting Freak
801
06-09-2020, 05:11 AM
#10
Actually, the real TDP... haha
B
bengalwatcher
06-09-2020, 05:11 AM #10

Actually, the real TDP... haha

Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next