10900k valuation in 2021
10900k valuation in 2021
Hey everyone, from what I've noticed the 11700k seems to offer better IPC, which is great for gaming and Ryzen 6000 series chips. However, things like DDR5 and other upgrades might come with a higher price tag. I'm leaning towards the 10900k because it appears to be a solid value compared to other options. As someone who works with software and plays games, I appreciate being able to keep my RAM at 32GB with 3200MHz without losing performance. I also want Thunderbolt 3, and both Intel and AMD boards support it, though the Intel ones are a bit pricier. The 10900k is only £364 on Amazon and looks like it could last a long time. Meanwhile, next-gen Intel chips promise more IPC, but Ryzen still seems powerful enough for my needs. My current setup has a 9600k ATX with an RTX 3080, and I’m already pushing six cores at full speed. I also have an overclocked AIO that’s mostly for aesthetics, not performance.
You're weighing your choices carefully, and that's smart. It's natural to feel torn between strong possibilities and the risks involved. Every option has pros and cons, and it's okay to take your time figuring things out.
To conserve your RAM, consider using the latest Intel processors when they become available instead of upgrading to older 5000 series Ryzen models.
I'll include more powerful cores (11900K vs 10900K). It will also be the newest Intel processor available, not an older model.
I aim to reuse my existing RAM. It's not about skipping Ryzen entirely, just that it doesn't seem worthwhile right now. I understand 3200MHz is suboptimal for Ryzen, but I'm unsure how much worse it would be. If I switched to Ryzen, I'd prefer the 5900X which is 50% pricier than the 10900K. The 5800X isn't really appealing, though maybe I'm not treating it fairly.
From the only genuine article available, results seem to depend on workload: https://premiumbuilds.com/features/zen-3...-analysis/. Their figures appear questionable, though. I’d prefer sources like GamersNexus or HWUB over random sites. It seems unlikely you’d want to go with them. If you’re aiming for safety, the 10900K is a solid choice. I’m testing the beta version of the beta for that (i7 6950X, first-gen 14nm ringbus 10c/20t from 2016), even with the slower Broadwell-E clocks, I mainly run into problems with titles that rely heavily on single cores. A 10900K with full GHz clocks and improved IPC should handle it well.
The 9900k concept seems reasonable for now, though not the top choice. I’d be okay with it until prices drop—maybe 2023. They’re around £279, which feels high for a nearly two-generation-old system, though. The £90 extra for 10900k is a big upgrade but makes sense with a new motherboard and Thunderbolt 3. Then I’ll wonder what else I get.