F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop 100 dollar motherboard purchase

100 dollar motherboard purchase

100 dollar motherboard purchase

G
GenosFTW
Member
63
08-27-2016, 01:53 AM
#1
consider upgrading to a better PSU. currently there aren't many boards worth purchasing, but it seems the 60-65$ board is more practical than the 75$ ones they're promoting. moving to a C900 with a 250gb SSD would be a solid choice.
G
GenosFTW
08-27-2016, 01:53 AM #1

consider upgrading to a better PSU. currently there aren't many boards worth purchasing, but it seems the 60-65$ board is more practical than the 75$ ones they're promoting. moving to a C900 with a 250gb SSD would be a solid choice.

X
94
08-27-2016, 07:48 PM
#2
B450 Pro 4 B450 Tomahawk (if you manage) B450 Pro VDH Max
X
xXImTheAngelXx
08-27-2016, 07:48 PM #2

B450 Pro 4 B450 Tomahawk (if you manage) B450 Pro VDH Max

P
PersieO
Posting Freak
786
08-28-2016, 10:13 AM
#3
Gigabyte B450M DS3H offers a budget-friendly option suitable for up to eight cores, priced between $70 and $80. Asrock B450 Pro4 and B450M Pro4 provide superior performance and cost around $70 to $90, though availability may be limited. B550 boards tend to be pricier, starting near $100 or more. The B550 chipset alone is around $50, making it less affordable. For better value, consider Ryzen 3100 or 3300X models, or a 1600 AF/2600 3100 which costs about $110 but includes more cores and hyperthreading. If funds are tight, purchase an 8GB RAM stick for $30–40, then upgrade to used graphics cards for $30–50, and add memory later if needed.
P
PersieO
08-28-2016, 10:13 AM #3

Gigabyte B450M DS3H offers a budget-friendly option suitable for up to eight cores, priced between $70 and $80. Asrock B450 Pro4 and B450M Pro4 provide superior performance and cost around $70 to $90, though availability may be limited. B550 boards tend to be pricier, starting near $100 or more. The B550 chipset alone is around $50, making it less affordable. For better value, consider Ryzen 3100 or 3300X models, or a 1600 AF/2600 3100 which costs about $110 but includes more cores and hyperthreading. If funds are tight, purchase an 8GB RAM stick for $30–40, then upgrade to used graphics cards for $30–50, and add memory later if needed.

S
Shoo_
Junior Member
11
08-28-2016, 02:59 PM
#4
It claims a basic 2-stage 4-phase power design, which is quite low-end. Any specifications above 3300x seem excessive for this platform.
S
Shoo_
08-28-2016, 02:59 PM #4

It claims a basic 2-stage 4-phase power design, which is quite low-end. Any specifications above 3300x seem excessive for this platform.

L
lolzinho_mouse
Junior Member
6
08-28-2016, 10:32 PM
#5
The board features a four-stage VRM for the CPU, with one 4C10N MOSFET on the high side and two 4C06N ones on the low side. It includes a two-stage VRM—possibly doubled for the CPU and integrated graphics. It works fine. It’s a budget build, but not the absolute cheapest option. Compared to some A320 motherboards with less robust VRMs, it’s decent. Some might overstate the situation, but if it didn’t meet expectations, you’d see more complaints online.

The 2-phase VRM for the SoC and graphics could be a single unit or doubled. For power handling, 8 MOSFETs can easily manage up to 100W from an 8-core processor, which would be about 15W per MOSFET or roughly 20A. The 3300X draws around 70W at peak, and the VRM should handle it without issues. The 3200G model uses even less power.

The documentation links confirm the VRM supports up to eight cores at standard speeds. It gets a yellow rating with an asterisk for 100A, indicating capability for overclocked 8-core CPUs and 3900X at stock speeds (around 100A). A 92mm fan would help, placed so air flows downward across the heatsinks.
L
lolzinho_mouse
08-28-2016, 10:32 PM #5

The board features a four-stage VRM for the CPU, with one 4C10N MOSFET on the high side and two 4C06N ones on the low side. It includes a two-stage VRM—possibly doubled for the CPU and integrated graphics. It works fine. It’s a budget build, but not the absolute cheapest option. Compared to some A320 motherboards with less robust VRMs, it’s decent. Some might overstate the situation, but if it didn’t meet expectations, you’d see more complaints online.

The 2-phase VRM for the SoC and graphics could be a single unit or doubled. For power handling, 8 MOSFETs can easily manage up to 100W from an 8-core processor, which would be about 15W per MOSFET or roughly 20A. The 3300X draws around 70W at peak, and the VRM should handle it without issues. The 3200G model uses even less power.

The documentation links confirm the VRM supports up to eight cores at standard speeds. It gets a yellow rating with an asterisk for 100A, indicating capability for overclocked 8-core CPUs and 3900X at stock speeds (around 100A). A 92mm fan would help, placed so air flows downward across the heatsinks.

H
Hypocat
Member
59
09-14-2016, 12:39 PM
#6
Not making a direct comparison to the a320 actually shows superior performance, while for the b450 there are numerous excellent boards offering much better value. The pro4 clearly outperforms it in power delivery.
H
Hypocat
09-14-2016, 12:39 PM #6

Not making a direct comparison to the a320 actually shows superior performance, while for the b450 there are numerous excellent boards offering much better value. The pro4 clearly outperforms it in power delivery.

D
DuongFG
Member
52
09-14-2016, 04:51 PM
#7
Yeah, but it doesn't help him if the board is not available anywhere in stock. I'd recommend the Asrock models board not for the VRM but for the features, as it has usb 10g connectors on the io shield, depending on version you also have a usb type c on the io shield, and there's displayport and hdmi on the io shield while the Gigabyte board has only hdmi and dvi which sucks if you want to use 2 4k monitors with integrated graphics. The Asrock boards vrms have 3 phases, doubled... so you get 6 pairs of mosfets but they're higher quality mosfets with higher efficiency (less losses) and the heatsink is a bit better. You get either 6 x SM4337 for the hi-side mosfets and 6x SM4336 lo-side mosfets or 6x PZ0903PK hi-side and 2x PK618BA lo-side mosfets, But the point is both VRMs are just as good for up to 8 core processors...and he's looking for a cpu that consumes half of that on average.
D
DuongFG
09-14-2016, 04:51 PM #7

Yeah, but it doesn't help him if the board is not available anywhere in stock. I'd recommend the Asrock models board not for the VRM but for the features, as it has usb 10g connectors on the io shield, depending on version you also have a usb type c on the io shield, and there's displayport and hdmi on the io shield while the Gigabyte board has only hdmi and dvi which sucks if you want to use 2 4k monitors with integrated graphics. The Asrock boards vrms have 3 phases, doubled... so you get 6 pairs of mosfets but they're higher quality mosfets with higher efficiency (less losses) and the heatsink is a bit better. You get either 6 x SM4337 for the hi-side mosfets and 6x SM4336 lo-side mosfets or 6x PZ0903PK hi-side and 2x PK618BA lo-side mosfets, But the point is both VRMs are just as good for up to 8 core processors...and he's looking for a cpu that consumes half of that on average.