F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Z87 plus i7 at 4790k is a powerful setup.

Z87 plus i7 at 4790k is a powerful setup.

Z87 plus i7 at 4790k is a powerful setup.

D
DRV111
Member
147
09-19-2016, 03:18 PM
#1
I own an Asrock Z87 Pro4 and an i7 4790K. Will this setup sustain the i7’s turbo boost over time? How will the VRM heat management affect performance? Someone with experience in similar builds has advice—no intention to overclock. You mentioned the Z87 line is better suited for unlocked i5s like the 4690K, while the Z97 is designed for unlocked i7s such as the 4790K.
D
DRV111
09-19-2016, 03:18 PM #1

I own an Asrock Z87 Pro4 and an i7 4790K. Will this setup sustain the i7’s turbo boost over time? How will the VRM heat management affect performance? Someone with experience in similar builds has advice—no intention to overclock. You mentioned the Z87 line is better suited for unlocked i5s like the 4690K, while the Z97 is designed for unlocked i7s such as the 4790K.

K
Kres_Jacobsen
Junior Member
49
09-19-2016, 05:00 PM
#2
It's all good, should handle a 4790k as long as the CPU stays below max temperature. They're not big overclockers because of the timing settings.
K
Kres_Jacobsen
09-19-2016, 05:00 PM #2

It's all good, should handle a 4790k as long as the CPU stays below max temperature. They're not big overclockers because of the timing settings.

C
CHE3SY
Junior Member
17
09-20-2016, 12:13 AM
#3
The differences should be minimal since the Z97 is merely a rebranded version of the Z87. What truly counts are the unique designs and capabilities of each board.
C
CHE3SY
09-20-2016, 12:13 AM #3

The differences should be minimal since the Z97 is merely a rebranded version of the Z87. What truly counts are the unique designs and capabilities of each board.

S
124
09-21-2016, 09:50 PM
#4
It was just a minor tweak to the boards, complementing the xx90 chip improvements on top of the usual 4th generation updates. No noticeable changes at all.
S
SpeedyConsaleZ
09-21-2016, 09:50 PM #4

It was just a minor tweak to the boards, complementing the xx90 chip improvements on top of the usual 4th generation updates. No noticeable changes at all.

I
itacarambi
Member
189
09-22-2016, 02:54 AM
#5
This device has been around for a decade, so the main concern is whether it will continue to function properly...
I
itacarambi
09-22-2016, 02:54 AM #5

This device has been around for a decade, so the main concern is whether it will continue to function properly...

M
MrGasth
Member
226
10-04-2016, 06:50 AM
#6
rmv appears somewhat limited yet offers solid power efficiency, so everything should work fine. Adding a fan would help if temperatures rise. Z97 represents an update for Z87, meaning major changes aren’t expected—just check for any impact on OC performance. OC effects are uncertain, but it’s straightforward to confirm with simple tests.

Although the chip needs around 1.5V just to start at 4.5GHz and requires a PCH voltage bumped to 1.6V for reliable booting, it still manages stable operation at 3200c13 under dual-rank settings and normal voltages. This suggests it’s close to being defective, but even then it runs stably.

My other G3258 model supports 3300c13 with similar parameters, though it demands a higher voltage (1.3V for 4.5GHz) and needs adjusted PCH IO. It still performs decently at 3200c13 stable, albeit with lower efficiency.

For reference, DDR3 3200 is achievable even on lower-end chips. If you’re concerned about stability, consider a PCIe debug card—like the PC Analyzer—since it provides useful data for both troubleshooting and overclocking.

I won’t waste time on lengthy setup; most of this can be done in under an hour. Unless you need extensive testing, you’re good to go. Just keep in mind that voltage settings matter greatly, especially if you’re using older 2GBi chips.

If you want extra assurance, a ch341a with crossflash BIOS to Extreme4 or OCF can help, but E4 is the safest bet. Avoid overclocking without proper tools—it can cause serious issues.

For temperatures, delidding and using a heat spreader will make a big difference. If you’re running 4GBs, VDimm is fine, but for older models, it’s worth exploring.

If your RAM can’t reach 3600, pushing VDimm to 1.55V might be necessary, though it’s risky. For now, stick with the recommended settings and monitor closely.
M
MrGasth
10-04-2016, 06:50 AM #6

rmv appears somewhat limited yet offers solid power efficiency, so everything should work fine. Adding a fan would help if temperatures rise. Z97 represents an update for Z87, meaning major changes aren’t expected—just check for any impact on OC performance. OC effects are uncertain, but it’s straightforward to confirm with simple tests.

Although the chip needs around 1.5V just to start at 4.5GHz and requires a PCH voltage bumped to 1.6V for reliable booting, it still manages stable operation at 3200c13 under dual-rank settings and normal voltages. This suggests it’s close to being defective, but even then it runs stably.

My other G3258 model supports 3300c13 with similar parameters, though it demands a higher voltage (1.3V for 4.5GHz) and needs adjusted PCH IO. It still performs decently at 3200c13 stable, albeit with lower efficiency.

For reference, DDR3 3200 is achievable even on lower-end chips. If you’re concerned about stability, consider a PCIe debug card—like the PC Analyzer—since it provides useful data for both troubleshooting and overclocking.

I won’t waste time on lengthy setup; most of this can be done in under an hour. Unless you need extensive testing, you’re good to go. Just keep in mind that voltage settings matter greatly, especially if you’re using older 2GBi chips.

If you want extra assurance, a ch341a with crossflash BIOS to Extreme4 or OCF can help, but E4 is the safest bet. Avoid overclocking without proper tools—it can cause serious issues.

For temperatures, delidding and using a heat spreader will make a big difference. If you’re running 4GBs, VDimm is fine, but for older models, it’s worth exploring.

If your RAM can’t reach 3600, pushing VDimm to 1.55V might be necessary, though it’s risky. For now, stick with the recommended settings and monitor closely.

_
_iSing
Member
50
10-04-2016, 08:19 AM
#7
Yes, I'm here to provide the answer. Please let me know what you're curious about!
_
_iSing
10-04-2016, 08:19 AM #7

Yes, I'm here to provide the answer. Please let me know what you're curious about!

A
alexandre6768
Member
219
10-04-2016, 09:30 AM
#8
The statement is accurate but should remain focused on the original query.
A
alexandre6768
10-04-2016, 09:30 AM #8

The statement is accurate but should remain focused on the original query.

E
Erik878
Junior Member
11
10-22-2016, 01:53 PM
#9
I used to have a 4770K and a Z87 board, and they performed well at one point.
E
Erik878
10-22-2016, 01:53 PM #9

I used to have a 4770K and a Z87 board, and they performed well at one point.

X
xNymeria
Junior Member
44
10-22-2016, 05:02 PM
#10
4790k remains a modest power consumption unit when compared to today's CPUs, and Z87 and Z97 perform similarly in function. It should work well on that board. My 4790k can still maintain 4.5GHz across all cores with just a slight adjustment on my Z97 Impact VII, though that was the only motherboard it supported. Examining the Z87 model, the main change was the M.2 setup—upgraded from 2.0×1 to 3.0×4 by splitting the PCIe 16x lane.
X
xNymeria
10-22-2016, 05:02 PM #10

4790k remains a modest power consumption unit when compared to today's CPUs, and Z87 and Z97 perform similarly in function. It should work well on that board. My 4790k can still maintain 4.5GHz across all cores with just a slight adjustment on my Z97 Impact VII, though that was the only motherboard it supported. Examining the Z87 model, the main change was the M.2 setup—upgraded from 2.0×1 to 3.0×4 by splitting the PCIe 16x lane.