You'd likely pick a high-end motherboard with robust support for modern components and ample expansion options.
You'd likely pick a high-end motherboard with robust support for modern components and ample expansion options.
I am planning a new build and have already shared my thoughts, and received advice, in the new builds and planning forum. It's a great forum and the regular posters are very helpful as they are recommending motherboards based on budget. However, I have seen a lot of different views on what people think are best for the specific situation being asked about, but it's hard to tell what motherboards people prefer if there weren't monetary constraints. So I pose this question to you: If money is no object, what motherboard would you choose? I value your time, so I am not not looking for a thesis or anything inconvenient, but if you could explain why you prefer a certain motherboard and brand that would be helpful. Also, let's assume that this is a one shot deal, and we wouldn't be able to replace our motherboard in 10 years. Is most expensive better, or are there others out there for less money that are tried and true? It will be interesting to see the thoughts. Thank you!
I'm thinking about a consumer-grade MMO, if we count servers it shifts things. The choice comes down to... AMD. Yes, that's it—this isn't just fanboy stuff; I need AVX512 support, which Intel only provides in limited quantities. I want as many powerful cores as possible (Intel caps at eight) and around 30MB of L3 cache per core to minimize multithreading issues. For performance, I'm leaning toward an MSI motherboard with a solid BIOS or EVGA for reliability.
I would choose a 300,000$ Supermicro blade server board. There’s no issue with the price, as money is tight and these systems are built to last a decade or more. Many servers from that era are still in use today, which makes it a practical decision.
This model offers all the essentials I require and provides far more upgrade possibilities than anything else. I’d definitely choose an Asus board even with a different socket. Cost is always important to me, which is why I wouldn’t settle for anything less.
Usually people don't use a computer for ten years. Higher cost doesn't always mean better quality. The most costly boards are often made just for flashy features like XOC or similar gimmicks. Get the board with the specific functions you need—whether it's many USB ports, 2.5/10 gig Ethernet, USB C or Thunderbolt. Most reliable boards work well; steer clear of ASUS boards with x670/b650 chips if you're using a X3D chip, as they've proven unreliable recently.
They offer a solid experience for returns, unlike many others where the process feels complicated. Their hardware quality is consistent, and their UEFI setup stands out in the industry. While their BIOS isn’t as polished as ASUS’s, the transition to UEFI has improved it significantly. Interestingly, their layout mirrors ASUS’s design, making navigation with arrow keys much quicker and more intuitive than using a mouse. I’ve tested them alongside X58/X99 Classifieds, X79/X299 Darks, X79 and X299 Dark, as well as X48 and X470 Crosshair to compare.
I'm not familiar with the W790 lineup, but these options could fit my shortlist as well. They're essentially the next step after the X299, which I've been using for more than five years. Current consumer models are at a lower tier, and I'm hoping for an upgrade that's both reasonably priced. AMD doesn't seem to have any recent releases in this area.
They didn’t come to mind at first. Got it, I’ll look into it. Thanks for the note. P.S. The avatar is awesome!