F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop You can use 4x8GB, but consider your needs and system requirements.

You can use 4x8GB, but consider your needs and system requirements.

You can use 4x8GB, but consider your needs and system requirements.

H
Hooded_Master
Member
187
09-04-2016, 04:54 AM
#1
You just assembled your new PC with a focus on look, except for the RAM—it's basically just a PCB. You're going for an all-white build and planning to use Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO SL DDR4 3200Mhz 16GB modules. You want to fill all the RAM slots for style and aim for 32GB total. I'm curious about the trade-offs of using four modules instead of a single larger one. People say it might be slower, but I'm not sure if that's accurate.
H
Hooded_Master
09-04-2016, 04:54 AM #1

You just assembled your new PC with a focus on look, except for the RAM—it's basically just a PCB. You're going for an all-white build and planning to use Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO SL DDR4 3200Mhz 16GB modules. You want to fill all the RAM slots for style and aim for 32GB total. I'm curious about the trade-offs of using four modules instead of a single larger one. People say it might be slower, but I'm not sure if that's accurate.

M
mrBlackSam
Member
75
09-08-2016, 02:25 AM
#2
Some problems exist with high-speed RAM and four DDR5 modules, while DDR4 should function properly
M
mrBlackSam
09-08-2016, 02:25 AM #2

Some problems exist with high-speed RAM and four DDR5 modules, while DDR4 should function properly

Z
ZexyZeke
Member
166
09-22-2016, 11:01 PM
#3
They must maintain identical speed and timing to achieve identical results, except in cases where it differs. The issue with four modules is its increased likelihood of failing at higher speeds. A value of 3200 is considered moderate compared to modern norms, indicating minimal risk though not zero. Four modules can surpass two modules in performance based on their setup. Today I anticipate both 16GB and 8GB units will share the same tier. In that scenario, four 1R modules could outperform two 1R modules at the same speed and timing. Older 16GB units might be 2R, but newer ones are less common. This detail isn't typically mentioned by hobbyist parts. Eight GB units have remained 1R for a long time.
Z
ZexyZeke
09-22-2016, 11:01 PM #3

They must maintain identical speed and timing to achieve identical results, except in cases where it differs. The issue with four modules is its increased likelihood of failing at higher speeds. A value of 3200 is considered moderate compared to modern norms, indicating minimal risk though not zero. Four modules can surpass two modules in performance based on their setup. Today I anticipate both 16GB and 8GB units will share the same tier. In that scenario, four 1R modules could outperform two 1R modules at the same speed and timing. Older 16GB units might be 2R, but newer ones are less common. This detail isn't typically mentioned by hobbyist parts. Eight GB units have remained 1R for a long time.

K
Kunall
Member
205
09-23-2016, 07:46 AM
#4
Based on my observations, there are no significant drawbacks. With single-rank RAM modules, you can actually achieve a slight performance boost since they function similarly to dual-rank modules when all four slots are filled. While some mention potential compatibility concerns at higher speeds, staying within acceptable limits—like 3600 Mhz for Ryzen 5000—should prevent any problems. I've been using a 32 GB 3600 Mhz 4-stick setup for several years without any issues.
K
Kunall
09-23-2016, 07:46 AM #4

Based on my observations, there are no significant drawbacks. With single-rank RAM modules, you can actually achieve a slight performance boost since they function similarly to dual-rank modules when all four slots are filled. While some mention potential compatibility concerns at higher speeds, staying within acceptable limits—like 3600 Mhz for Ryzen 5000—should prevent any problems. I've been using a 32 GB 3600 Mhz 4-stick setup for several years without any issues.

M
Mountain_Man8
Member
182
09-23-2016, 09:41 AM
#5
It tends to perform slightly better due to dual-rank configuration, whereas 2x16GB is typically single-rank. This provides a modest speed boost (~400MT/s worth) without affecting overall timings. Running 4x8GB can be more challenging at higher speeds (except on some Z390 boards), but it remains manageable around 3200MT/s. The biggest concern will be compatibility—just because kits share the same model number doesn’t guarantee identical results, so there’s a small chance of problems. Even with different models, failure rates are low (~5%), though you should keep this in mind if issues arise.
M
Mountain_Man8
09-23-2016, 09:41 AM #5

It tends to perform slightly better due to dual-rank configuration, whereas 2x16GB is typically single-rank. This provides a modest speed boost (~400MT/s worth) without affecting overall timings. Running 4x8GB can be more challenging at higher speeds (except on some Z390 boards), but it remains manageable around 3200MT/s. The biggest concern will be compatibility—just because kits share the same model number doesn’t guarantee identical results, so there’s a small chance of problems. Even with different models, failure rates are low (~5%), though you should keep this in mind if issues arise.

C
cookiedough909
Posting Freak
782
09-28-2016, 06:16 PM
#6
I usually pick two sticks at a time to keep the flexibility to double them later without discarding everything.
C
cookiedough909
09-28-2016, 06:16 PM #6

I usually pick two sticks at a time to keep the flexibility to double them later without discarding everything.