Yes, they’re good options to grab.
Yes, they’re good options to grab.
Borderlands 3 looks appealing during sales; it’s a solid pick-up option. Matchmaking in Borderlands 3 can feel frustrating at times. XCOM 2 is worth considering if you’re into tactical RPGs.
matchmaking isn't great in BL3, but the single-player experience is amazing. Many players thought the main villain duo was super annoying, which is part of their streamer image—those stereotypes are all over the place. If you're okay with meta jokes or really enjoyed the earlier games and prequel, it's mostly the same with improved weapons and more options. Xcom 2 gained traction thanks to its fan base from Xcom 1, though I haven't played them much and might never.
It's considered solid but not quite as impressive as Borderlands 2. Those games offered multiplayer, though it was mostly cooperative play. The multiplayer mechanics were built around teamwork, but nobody really stuck together.
I have Borderlands 2 on Steam but haven’t played it yet. I also haven’t played the original game, though I don’t own it. The third one seems intriguing and enjoyable, offering improved visuals—looking for a solid time-waster, maybe a cooperative shooter with replay value.
Definitely try it two, it remains a required part of any system I own. Even once the tale wraps up and side missions are finished, enjoying the action in the cars or reliving the various boss fights keeps the excitement alive—especially since they keep appearing at their zones, only discovered after completing my second full run and switching to one just for ammo before facing a tough boss battle with no gear.
After finishing BL2, check out BL3 and see if you're still interested. I played 2 about two months ago with friends—it was enjoyable at first, but once all the quests were done, there wasn't much excitement left. Regarding XCOM 2, it feels similar to the first part, though I really liked XCOM: EW more. Perhaps because it was superior or maybe it was the segment that first caught my attention.
I can share my thoughts on 2.2. A serious cooperative would be ideal, but the challenge was the lack of tension during play. It felt like random players rushing in and out without much planning. I only replayed it a few times after trying the single-player version. The story was engaging, though not as deep as games like Dark Souls. Visually, the graphics are solid and stylish, with a comic-book aesthetic blended into a 3D experience—like reality being subtly altered. It looks good without needing extreme realism. For a casual, fun experience, it’s a solid pick. There are other mindless options too, but this one offers more depth than simple loot and shoot games. If you’re after something lighthearted, it’s worth checking out. The pacing is better than some titles, and the characters add humor and charm. Many quests involve collecting items, which adds to the exploration.