Yes, the household PC can transition smoothly to Linux.
Yes, the household PC can transition smoothly to Linux.
I know there are numerous games available for Linux. However, it remains a less favorable choice compared to other platforms since it doesn't support DirectX (even using WINE isn't enough). No matter how many indie titles it offers, it will always be the least ideal option for a dedicated gaming PC.
Linux and viruses: The key reason for the absence of viruses on Linux is the lack of demand for them. This might seem like a joke, but in reality, malware (viruses) behaves similarly to other software aimed at desktop users. Many people still use browsers on Windows rather than Linux, making it an easier target for malicious actors. Other factors exist, but they are less significant. Linux typically runs fewer services by default and has a longer tradition of separating user space from kernel space, along with stricter file permissions. For most malware designed to affect desktop users, the goal is personal data—things like family photos, work documents, or long-term projects—which are far more valuable than system files. From a malware perspective, regular users usually don’t need root access to cause damage. TL;DR: Linux remains largely virus-free, though this could change if its popularity grows among desktop users. EDIT: As previously noted, it’s possible to infect Windows systems on Linux, and while they won’t run normally (except with Wine), you might still spread them accidentally. A virus scanner can help, such as ClamAV. Use common sense when handling your computer, regardless of the operating system in use. Edited February 7, 2018 by Wild Penquin
DirectX wasn’t the leading graphics API until 2005. OpenGL was more widely adopted at that time. Microsoft strategically undermined OpenGL and leveraged their operating system dominance to push developers toward DirectX. Valve, the company behind Steam, had previously claimed OpenGL was simply better than DirectX.
I've been playing games on Linux occasionally over the past few years. It's improving gradually, though slowly. More titles come out each year. Competitive players usually avoid Linux right now—unless a native version exists for a specific game—or unless it's a turn-based title where speed isn't essential (as long as it works in Wine). For games without native support: retro gaming can actually shine on Linux, or at least match Windows in many aspects (better utilities, more system control, etc.). Still, retro gaming feels a bit like a challenge, even on Windows. Linux offers superior tools for those who enjoy hacking, and Wine can sometimes outperform the latest Windows versions—especially for older games. However, for modern titles that run smoothly on current Windows without extra steps, Windows remains the clear choice. Using Wine isn't always smooth, though. Personally, I don’t think it’s a perfect fit unless you're not bothered by compatibility issues. OP seems relaxed about gaming, so Linux should work just fine for most needs. But if you need a specific Windows-only game to run without hassle, it could be a real roadblock. Edited February 7, 2018 by Wild Penquin
You think everyone understands you can play games on Linux and you've shared videos before. What's the reason?
He’s trying to show that Linux can be a solid gaming choice beyond just being an operating system. While Windows still leads the market, there are legitimate reasons to consider Linux as a viable platform for gaming.
Games built natively for Linux often perform better in FPS compared to Windows versions. Metro serves as another case where performance edges out Windows on similar systems. Most indie titles show this advantage, and Linux generally runs lighter than Windows for the same reasons.
What's interesting? The PS4 uses a BSD kernel, which means it runs on a version of BSD similar to Linux. https://www.extremetech.com/gaming/15947...r-to-linux windows isn't the gaming king, right?