F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Yes, it's safe to set bclk to 103.0 in the XMP profile.

Yes, it's safe to set bclk to 103.0 in the XMP profile.

Yes, it's safe to set bclk to 103.0 in the XMP profile.

B
BroZockerLuca
Member
73
12-12-2018, 12:05 PM
#1
Here’s a revised version of your text:

So this is my setup: an I7 4770 non-K Sapphire nitro+ RX 590 SE with 16 GB DDR3 RAM at 1600 MHz, installed in the QVL on the Asus Z97-A motherboard. The power supply is a USB 3.0 Corsair HX 850 gold semi-modular unit paired with a Noctua NH-U12S, which includes a second NF-F12 fan, an Antec 302 PSU with stock antennas, and two Noctua NF-S12A fans for intake and exhaust. I also have a TeamGroup L5 3D Lite SSD (1 TB) and a Toshiba DT01ADA200 2 TB drive at 7200 RPM with 64 MB cache.

I remember in the past that the only XMP profile available was one with a RAM speed of 1333 (1373), using timing 9-9-9-24 and a base clock of 103.0 MHz. I wasn’t happy with that speed, so I manually set it to 1600 MHz, which ended up being 1648 due to the lower base clock. I was curious why the profile included a bclk overclock and whether it was safe to run at that frequency. I’ve read that excessive bclk overclocking might cause data corruption over time.

Currently, I set the bclk manually to 100 MHz and kept the RAM at 1600 MHz with the same timing, and everything works perfectly. I’m considering trying to push the RAM further, even though it might not give much extra performance. Overclocking can be exciting, but I’m cautious—if it risks damaging my GPU or drive, I’ll hold off.

Do you have any advice or suggestions?
B
BroZockerLuca
12-12-2018, 12:05 PM #1

Here’s a revised version of your text:

So this is my setup: an I7 4770 non-K Sapphire nitro+ RX 590 SE with 16 GB DDR3 RAM at 1600 MHz, installed in the QVL on the Asus Z97-A motherboard. The power supply is a USB 3.0 Corsair HX 850 gold semi-modular unit paired with a Noctua NH-U12S, which includes a second NF-F12 fan, an Antec 302 PSU with stock antennas, and two Noctua NF-S12A fans for intake and exhaust. I also have a TeamGroup L5 3D Lite SSD (1 TB) and a Toshiba DT01ADA200 2 TB drive at 7200 RPM with 64 MB cache.

I remember in the past that the only XMP profile available was one with a RAM speed of 1333 (1373), using timing 9-9-9-24 and a base clock of 103.0 MHz. I wasn’t happy with that speed, so I manually set it to 1600 MHz, which ended up being 1648 due to the lower base clock. I was curious why the profile included a bclk overclock and whether it was safe to run at that frequency. I’ve read that excessive bclk overclocking might cause data corruption over time.

Currently, I set the bclk manually to 100 MHz and kept the RAM at 1600 MHz with the same timing, and everything works perfectly. I’m considering trying to push the RAM further, even though it might not give much extra performance. Overclocking can be exciting, but I’m cautious—if it risks damaging my GPU or drive, I’ll hold off.

Do you have any advice or suggestions?

B
Blackman__
Member
55
12-14-2018, 10:17 PM
#2
If frequency isn't achieved, adjust the clock speeds. A common setting for DDR3 800/1600 is 8-8-8-24-32. For 9-9-9 it's a bit too relaxed at that speed. If you can use higher memory options through BIOS, a better timing would be 9-10-9-27-36 at 1000/2000mhz. You can change the output clock if needed.
B
Blackman__
12-14-2018, 10:17 PM #2

If frequency isn't achieved, adjust the clock speeds. A common setting for DDR3 800/1600 is 8-8-8-24-32. For 9-9-9 it's a bit too relaxed at that speed. If you can use higher memory options through BIOS, a better timing would be 9-10-9-27-36 at 1000/2000mhz. You can change the output clock if needed.

R
Riggsock
Member
173
12-15-2018, 03:03 AM
#3
Thanks for the timing details. I’ll give it another shot next time I’m away from work. The system ran smoothly at 103.0 bclk, but I’m worried about how it might affect other parts over time. I won’t be upgrading in the next couple of years since I don’t have the funds for a new setup. For now, I’m telling myself I don’t really need to upgrade.
R
Riggsock
12-15-2018, 03:03 AM #3

Thanks for the timing details. I’ll give it another shot next time I’m away from work. The system ran smoothly at 103.0 bclk, but I’m worried about how it might affect other parts over time. I won’t be upgrading in the next couple of years since I don’t have the funds for a new setup. For now, I’m telling myself I don’t really need to upgrade.