F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Networks Yes, it appears to be a misleading advertisement.

Yes, it appears to be a misleading advertisement.

Yes, it appears to be a misleading advertisement.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
A
alex4max
Member
72
04-06-2016, 12:05 PM
#1
The device advertises 2402 Mbps on the 5 GHz WiFi band, yet its Ethernet ports are gigabit. How does it achieve this while only handling up to 1000 Mbps as input? Compared to a tp-link WiFi-6 model offering 1201 Mbps on 5 GHz, this device is more powerful but costs ₹4299 versus ₹2799 for the cheaper option.
A
alex4max
04-06-2016, 12:05 PM #1

The device advertises 2402 Mbps on the 5 GHz WiFi band, yet its Ethernet ports are gigabit. How does it achieve this while only handling up to 1000 Mbps as input? Compared to a tp-link WiFi-6 model offering 1201 Mbps on 5 GHz, this device is more powerful but costs ₹4299 versus ₹2799 for the cheaper option.

M
mitaapomcgg1
Junior Member
11
04-08-2016, 05:46 PM
#2
Technically, the difference might lie in the speed.
M
mitaapomcgg1
04-08-2016, 05:46 PM #2

Technically, the difference might lie in the speed.

Z
ZakForTheSlay
Junior Member
1
04-22-2016, 04:09 PM
#3
Theoretical maximum? yes. Likely includes notes like asterisks indicating the upper limit in a lab setting.
Z
ZakForTheSlay
04-22-2016, 04:09 PM #3

Theoretical maximum? yes. Likely includes notes like asterisks indicating the upper limit in a lab setting.

T
ThorTheFirst
Junior Member
49
04-30-2016, 03:16 PM
#4
Just started. I noticed some brands are completely fake. Then the reviews act like they’re hiding something.
T
ThorTheFirst
04-30-2016, 03:16 PM #4

Just started. I noticed some brands are completely fake. Then the reviews act like they’re hiding something.

B
Baernd
Junior Member
13
05-07-2016, 11:54 PM
#5
Several gadgets can link at once. That means switching from one Ethernet to another won’t work. But combining more than one Ethernet with Wi-Fi or vice versa could be possible.
B
Baernd
05-07-2016, 11:54 PM #5

Several gadgets can link at once. That means switching from one Ethernet to another won’t work. But combining more than one Ethernet with Wi-Fi or vice versa could be possible.

R
Roe56
Member
102
05-08-2016, 11:24 AM
#6
These devices usually link the LAN ports to a built-in switch, limiting speeds when using many LAN clients. Also, Wi-Fi operates in half-duplex mode, meaning if some devices were pushing maximum data at 2.4Gbps, only about 1.2Gbps would be transferred between them.
R
Roe56
05-08-2016, 11:24 AM #6

These devices usually link the LAN ports to a built-in switch, limiting speeds when using many LAN clients. Also, Wi-Fi operates in half-duplex mode, meaning if some devices were pushing maximum data at 2.4Gbps, only about 1.2Gbps would be transferred between them.

B
BabyBee2
Member
76
05-09-2016, 12:23 AM
#7
It's the speed of the wireless connection (all gadgets linked via the shared network have a total of 2402 mbps—perhaps a phone can send or receive files between a laptop and another device wirelessly, while one device can stream or download using a 4 gigabit port, and another might get internet data through the wide-area port).
B
BabyBee2
05-09-2016, 12:23 AM #7

It's the speed of the wireless connection (all gadgets linked via the shared network have a total of 2402 mbps—perhaps a phone can send or receive files between a laptop and another device wirelessly, while one device can stream or download using a 4 gigabit port, and another might get internet data through the wide-area port).

K
Kronatius
Junior Member
40
05-12-2016, 04:24 PM
#8
Based on what I understand, I was imagining the best scenario. I hadn't considered Wi-Fi duplex before, which made me think about it now. Without checking, do you know if there are reserved time slots in each direction? If not, would the maximum bandwidth be half of what's advertised? Assuming Ethernet switching isn't a bottleneck, it's possible to move data between Wi-Fi client A and Ethernet client A, and from Ethernet client B to Wi-Fi client B, achieving the highest possible combined speed.
K
Kronatius
05-12-2016, 04:24 PM #8

Based on what I understand, I was imagining the best scenario. I hadn't considered Wi-Fi duplex before, which made me think about it now. Without checking, do you know if there are reserved time slots in each direction? If not, would the maximum bandwidth be half of what's advertised? Assuming Ethernet switching isn't a bottleneck, it's possible to move data between Wi-Fi client A and Ethernet client A, and from Ethernet client B to Wi-Fi client B, achieving the highest possible combined speed.

G
Gongas_PT
Junior Member
6
05-13-2016, 06:18 AM
#9
The stated speed represents the overall performance in one direction. Achieving roughly half the maximum speed works when sharing traffic evenly in both directions. This also means you're aiming for close to these numbers. In practice, you typically experience around two-thirds of the theoretical rate. To reach the peak 2400mbit capability, your clients must have suitable capabilities, the proper channel width, minimal interference, and robust signal quality.
G
Gongas_PT
05-13-2016, 06:18 AM #9

The stated speed represents the overall performance in one direction. Achieving roughly half the maximum speed works when sharing traffic evenly in both directions. This also means you're aiming for close to these numbers. In practice, you typically experience around two-thirds of the theoretical rate. To reach the peak 2400mbit capability, your clients must have suitable capabilities, the proper channel width, minimal interference, and robust signal quality.

G
GamenMetLeviNL
Senior Member
638
05-13-2016, 07:34 AM
#10
G
GamenMetLeviNL
05-13-2016, 07:34 AM #10

Pages (2): 1 2 Next