F5F Stay Refreshed Software Operating Systems Yes, Chromium-based browsers like Firefox and Brave are lightweight options suitable for low RAM systems.

Yes, Chromium-based browsers like Firefox and Brave are lightweight options suitable for low RAM systems.

Yes, Chromium-based browsers like Firefox and Brave are lightweight options suitable for low RAM systems.

M
Mitas211
Member
124
07-23-2016, 04:52 PM
#1
Hello, I’m looking for a VPS in the UK that fits my budget. I want the best value, so cheaper options are ideal. I found Fasthosts offering a VPS with 1 vCPU, 512MB RAM and 10GB SSD. Since my work involves only a few browser tabs and I need to run just one Chrome extension called Bitwarden, I’m checking if that setup works on limited RAM. I have basic Linux experience, mainly with Ubuntu, and I’m open to learning other OSes if needed. My goal is to find a browser that uses minimal memory while supporting the extension I need. Could you suggest suitable browsers and OS configurations that match these requirements? Thank you!
M
Mitas211
07-23-2016, 04:52 PM #1

Hello, I’m looking for a VPS in the UK that fits my budget. I want the best value, so cheaper options are ideal. I found Fasthosts offering a VPS with 1 vCPU, 512MB RAM and 10GB SSD. Since my work involves only a few browser tabs and I need to run just one Chrome extension called Bitwarden, I’m checking if that setup works on limited RAM. I have basic Linux experience, mainly with Ubuntu, and I’m open to learning other OSes if needed. My goal is to find a browser that uses minimal memory while supporting the extension I need. Could you suggest suitable browsers and OS configurations that match these requirements? Thank you!

_
_God47_
Member
108
07-25-2016, 04:23 AM
#2
These VPS usually lack a graphical interface, making it difficult to use a browser. Why do you require one for Bitwarden? You can run it without a browser, which makes more sense to me.
_
_God47_
07-25-2016, 04:23 AM #2

These VPS usually lack a graphical interface, making it difficult to use a browser. Why do you require one for Bitwarden? You can run it without a browser, which makes more sense to me.

H
horselover328
Member
148
07-25-2016, 08:07 AM
#3
Use Debian as the base system and install the native Chromium browser package. Since Bitwarden is an app, launching Chromium should suffice.
H
horselover328
07-25-2016, 08:07 AM #3

Use Debian as the base system and install the native Chromium browser package. Since Bitwarden is an app, launching Chromium should suffice.

S
smiley_74
Junior Member
14
07-28-2016, 11:19 PM
#4
Even the thinnest Linux distribution paired with a desktop setup already uses around 300 Mb of RAM (observed in older Lubuntu and Raspbian, a Debian variant on Raspberry Pi). Including the browser and its content makes it easy to notice performance issues starting from the second tab. With 1 Gb of RAM and standard Chromium, you can comfortably open 3-4 tabs before the system becomes unresponsive (tested on Raspberry Pi 3B+).
S
smiley_74
07-28-2016, 11:19 PM #4

Even the thinnest Linux distribution paired with a desktop setup already uses around 300 Mb of RAM (observed in older Lubuntu and Raspbian, a Debian variant on Raspberry Pi). Including the browser and its content makes it easy to notice performance issues starting from the second tab. With 1 Gb of RAM and standard Chromium, you can comfortably open 3-4 tabs before the system becomes unresponsive (tested on Raspberry Pi 3B+).

R
rosie2435
Senior Member
475
07-29-2016, 01:04 AM
#5
SRWare Iron and the Bitwarden CLI eliminate the need for a browser. For systems with limited RAM, avoid GUI applications entirely. I'm currently using the full Ubuntu desktop, which consumes just over 1GB of memory when no programs are running. If a GUI is necessary, consider Xubuntu, Lubuntu, or similar lightweight distributions. I strongly advise against using GUI-based distros unless absolutely required.
R
rosie2435
07-29-2016, 01:04 AM #5

SRWare Iron and the Bitwarden CLI eliminate the need for a browser. For systems with limited RAM, avoid GUI applications entirely. I'm currently using the full Ubuntu desktop, which consumes just over 1GB of memory when no programs are running. If a GUI is necessary, consider Xubuntu, Lubuntu, or similar lightweight distributions. I strongly advise against using GUI-based distros unless absolutely required.

J
jjsoini
Posting Freak
809
07-30-2016, 04:02 PM
#6
He suggested considering Lubuntu, one of the Pi distros, or LXLE as alternatives. VTS availability is still uncertain. For more details, check the link provided.
J
jjsoini
07-30-2016, 04:02 PM #6

He suggested considering Lubuntu, one of the Pi distros, or LXLE as alternatives. VTS availability is still uncertain. For more details, check the link provided.

X
xGrapeNinja
Junior Member
16
07-31-2016, 12:17 PM
#7
You aim to access sites using a browser hosted on the UK-based VPS. The approach is straightforward and requires minimal resources, relying mainly on SSH. Two options stand out: either tunnel directly to the remote sites or configure a secure SOCKS proxy. Both methods demand only SSH, offering strong security with low overhead. Alternatively, you can run a local X server alongside the browser, handling graphics locally—this uses more resources and may affect performance, especially with latency-sensitive applications. https://kasmweb.com/ provides guidance on implementing these solutions. Connecting via a browser tool like Mobaxterm simplifies the process, allowing X-forwarding and local installation of browsers without launching the X server itself. This method conserves resources and streamlines setup, though it may introduce slight delays in web interactions.
X
xGrapeNinja
07-31-2016, 12:17 PM #7

You aim to access sites using a browser hosted on the UK-based VPS. The approach is straightforward and requires minimal resources, relying mainly on SSH. Two options stand out: either tunnel directly to the remote sites or configure a secure SOCKS proxy. Both methods demand only SSH, offering strong security with low overhead. Alternatively, you can run a local X server alongside the browser, handling graphics locally—this uses more resources and may affect performance, especially with latency-sensitive applications. https://kasmweb.com/ provides guidance on implementing these solutions. Connecting via a browser tool like Mobaxterm simplifies the process, allowing X-forwarding and local installation of browsers without launching the X server itself. This method conserves resources and streamlines setup, though it may introduce slight delays in web interactions.