F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Xeon versus i7 in triple channel setup with four DIMMs

Xeon versus i7 in triple channel setup with four DIMMs

Xeon versus i7 in triple channel setup with four DIMMs

Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next
L
Lips
Senior Member
624
07-05-2025, 08:39 AM
#1
Hey there, everyone. I hope you're all doing great. I'm planning to purchase a Dell T3500 in the near future, paired with an Xeon X5687. Both models were launched around the same time, so they share similar 32nm manufacturing processes and comparable clock speeds. The main distinction I noticed is that the Xeon includes a 12MB cache compared to the 8MB on the i7. However, the Xeon doesn't support AVX instructions. Someone here, could you let me know which option would perform better in real-world scenarios? Also, the motherboard supports six RAM slots, which means it can run Triple Channel. I'm thinking of installing four 4GB modules for a total of 16GB at 1600MHz. Would it be feasible to use triple channel with those configurations? Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
L
Lips
07-05-2025, 08:39 AM #1

Hey there, everyone. I hope you're all doing great. I'm planning to purchase a Dell T3500 in the near future, paired with an Xeon X5687. Both models were launched around the same time, so they share similar 32nm manufacturing processes and comparable clock speeds. The main distinction I noticed is that the Xeon includes a 12MB cache compared to the 8MB on the i7. However, the Xeon doesn't support AVX instructions. Someone here, could you let me know which option would perform better in real-world scenarios? Also, the motherboard supports six RAM slots, which means it can run Triple Channel. I'm thinking of installing four 4GB modules for a total of 16GB at 1600MHz. Would it be feasible to use triple channel with those configurations? Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!

C
CherryQuake
Member
166
07-05-2025, 05:16 PM
#2
The Xeon seems better for multithreading while the i7 shines in singlethread tasks. Regarding memory, four units isn't a multiple of three—either use three 12GB sticks or invest more for 24GB total.
C
CherryQuake
07-05-2025, 05:16 PM #2

The Xeon seems better for multithreading while the i7 shines in singlethread tasks. Regarding memory, four units isn't a multiple of three—either use three 12GB sticks or invest more for 24GB total.

R
regis123
Junior Member
19
07-25-2025, 03:27 AM
#3
The 2600 is built on an updated architecture and performs better with each clock cycle. I’d grab the 2600 if possible.
R
regis123
07-25-2025, 03:27 AM #3

The 2600 is built on an updated architecture and performs better with each clock cycle. I’d grab the 2600 if possible.

F
Frost_Pvp017
Member
225
07-31-2025, 01:51 PM
#4
Oh well, the prices you're seeing are similar, but the upgrade from your old i7 to the new Xeon might still offer improvements. The extra RAM and faster components could make a noticeable difference in performance, especially for multitasking or running demanding applications.
F
Frost_Pvp017
07-31-2025, 01:51 PM #4

Oh well, the prices you're seeing are similar, but the upgrade from your old i7 to the new Xeon might still offer improvements. The extra RAM and faster components could make a noticeable difference in performance, especially for multitasking or running demanding applications.

T
TomBarty
Member
175
08-01-2025, 09:45 AM
#5
It varies by scenario, but I’d favor the 2600 for its overall performance. The additional cache and RAM lanes likely offer less benefit compared to the updated design in the 2600, plus the newer AVX software should provide extra support.
T
TomBarty
08-01-2025, 09:45 AM #5

It varies by scenario, but I’d favor the 2600 for its overall performance. The additional cache and RAM lanes likely offer less benefit compared to the updated design in the 2600, plus the newer AVX software should provide extra support.

G
GhostyLite
Member
238
08-01-2025, 05:03 PM
#6
Evaluate whether reducing your RAM to 12GB offers noticeable benefits for Triple Channel and bandwidth, or if the gains are minimal compared to other factors.
G
GhostyLite
08-01-2025, 05:03 PM #6

Evaluate whether reducing your RAM to 12GB offers noticeable benefits for Triple Channel and bandwidth, or if the gains are minimal compared to other factors.

C
carp3
Senior Member
572
08-04-2025, 03:28 AM
#7
The variation will be very minor. Probably not worth the effort.
C
carp3
08-04-2025, 03:28 AM #7

The variation will be very minor. Probably not worth the effort.

C
candyman3d
Junior Member
1
08-04-2025, 01:35 PM
#8
Thanks for the update. Was it a favorable offer?
C
candyman3d
08-04-2025, 01:35 PM #8

Thanks for the update. Was it a favorable offer?

R
RDA
Junior Member
15
08-04-2025, 04:05 PM
#9
Unless you're engaging in tasks that clearly require a lot of data, it's not worthwhile.
R
RDA
08-04-2025, 04:05 PM #9

Unless you're engaging in tasks that clearly require a lot of data, it's not worthwhile.

C
CrazyBessyCat
Posting Freak
912
08-04-2025, 05:24 PM
#10
The gap between Westmere-EP and Sandy Bridge is significant. Sandy offers superior IPC and AVX capabilities. Triple channel memory (supporting 4 sticks in flex mode) won’t bridge this gap. You also have the option to use a 6-core processor on the T3500 if threads are essential. AVX and IPC are the key distinctions. Performance will drop noticeably in single-core or AVX-dependent tasks.
C
CrazyBessyCat
08-04-2025, 05:24 PM #10

The gap between Westmere-EP and Sandy Bridge is significant. Sandy offers superior IPC and AVX capabilities. Triple channel memory (supporting 4 sticks in flex mode) won’t bridge this gap. You also have the option to use a 6-core processor on the T3500 if threads are essential. AVX and IPC are the key distinctions. Performance will drop noticeably in single-core or AVX-dependent tasks.

Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next