F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking Would I be giving up a free performance opportunity?

Would I be giving up a free performance opportunity?

Would I be giving up a free performance opportunity?

G
GeorgePlaysFTW
Senior Member
261
03-25-2016, 08:19 AM
#1
Z170 Pro gaming mobo
24gb 2666mhz ram
6600k i5 @ 4.4ghz
Hyper 212x with 2x fans
Monitoring temperatures in hwmonitor shows my PC reaches around 57 degrees clocked at 4.4ghz during intense gameplay, such as playing Rust on maximum settings. I’m wondering if there’s still room for improvement from the CPU with these heat levels or if performance will start to decline as clocks increase further.
G
GeorgePlaysFTW
03-25-2016, 08:19 AM #1

Z170 Pro gaming mobo
24gb 2666mhz ram
6600k i5 @ 4.4ghz
Hyper 212x with 2x fans
Monitoring temperatures in hwmonitor shows my PC reaches around 57 degrees clocked at 4.4ghz during intense gameplay, such as playing Rust on maximum settings. I’m wondering if there’s still room for improvement from the CPU with these heat levels or if performance will start to decline as clocks increase further.

T
Toodaloo_246
Senior Member
439
03-25-2016, 09:32 AM
#2
There are always the laws of diminishing returns, but they vary for each CPU. You could begin at 4.4GHz with 1.308v and 60°C. A slight increase to 4.5GHz might require 1.323v and 64°C, followed by a jump to 4.6GHz needing 1.434v and 80°C. The minor jump to 4.5GHz is your best attempt, even though the CPU can reach 4.6GHz and possibly stabilize at 4.7GHz. However, the required voltages and temperatures with your cooler are well outside what’s practical. It simply isn’t worth the marginal gain in performance.

If you manage to overclock and achieve solid improvements, that’s fine. But if you’re only chasing GHz numbers while ignoring stability and safety, it’s a waste of effort and responsibility.
T
Toodaloo_246
03-25-2016, 09:32 AM #2

There are always the laws of diminishing returns, but they vary for each CPU. You could begin at 4.4GHz with 1.308v and 60°C. A slight increase to 4.5GHz might require 1.323v and 64°C, followed by a jump to 4.6GHz needing 1.434v and 80°C. The minor jump to 4.5GHz is your best attempt, even though the CPU can reach 4.6GHz and possibly stabilize at 4.7GHz. However, the required voltages and temperatures with your cooler are well outside what’s practical. It simply isn’t worth the marginal gain in performance.

If you manage to overclock and achieve solid improvements, that’s fine. But if you’re only chasing GHz numbers while ignoring stability and safety, it’s a waste of effort and responsibility.

R
Rad_ish
Junior Member
42
03-27-2016, 04:59 AM
#3
As games and everything come together, you won't notice significant improvements with any quicker speeds. Progress will likely increase by only about 3 fps per 0.1 of a second.
R
Rad_ish
03-27-2016, 04:59 AM #3

As games and everything come together, you won't notice significant improvements with any quicker speeds. Progress will likely increase by only about 3 fps per 0.1 of a second.

3
3gilad3
Senior Member
735
03-27-2016, 01:11 PM
#4
It's Skylake. You'll notice improvements with faster clocks, though temperatures won't impact much until you approach the maximum temperature limit. The main worries with older CPUs and high heat aren't performance loss, but reduced lifespan. Generally, 70°C and 57°C are equivalent according to the CPU specs—it's just a matter of interpretation.
3
3gilad3
03-27-2016, 01:11 PM #4

It's Skylake. You'll notice improvements with faster clocks, though temperatures won't impact much until you approach the maximum temperature limit. The main worries with older CPUs and high heat aren't performance loss, but reduced lifespan. Generally, 70°C and 57°C are equivalent according to the CPU specs—it's just a matter of interpretation.

G
Gryf76
Junior Member
11
04-04-2016, 10:37 AM
#5
my own 7700K maintains fairly stable temperatures even (65°C in games, 73°C in Prime 95/small FFTs) at 4.7 GHz, but increasing to 4.8 GHz needed a higher core voltage that pushed temperatures past 83°C, which exceeds what I was hoping for consistently during regular use.
G
Gryf76
04-04-2016, 10:37 AM #5

my own 7700K maintains fairly stable temperatures even (65°C in games, 73°C in Prime 95/small FFTs) at 4.7 GHz, but increasing to 4.8 GHz needed a higher core voltage that pushed temperatures past 83°C, which exceeds what I was hoping for consistently during regular use.

C
CandyBugz
Member
122
04-04-2016, 02:09 PM
#6
There are always the laws of diminishing returns, but they vary for each CPU. You could begin at 4.4GHz with 1.308v and 60°C. A slight increase to 4.5GHz might require 1.323v and 64°C, followed by a jump to 4.6GHz needing 1.434v and 80°C. The minor jump to 4.5GHz is your best attempt, even though the CPU can reach 4.6GHz and possibly stabilize at 4.7GHz. However, the required voltages and temperatures with your cooler are far from practical. It simply isn't worth the extra few frames.

If you manage to overclock and achieve a noticeable boost with acceptable performance, that's fine. But trying to push a PC solely for higher GHz numbers, while ignoring safety and responsibility, is essentially wasteful.
C
CandyBugz
04-04-2016, 02:09 PM #6

There are always the laws of diminishing returns, but they vary for each CPU. You could begin at 4.4GHz with 1.308v and 60°C. A slight increase to 4.5GHz might require 1.323v and 64°C, followed by a jump to 4.6GHz needing 1.434v and 80°C. The minor jump to 4.5GHz is your best attempt, even though the CPU can reach 4.6GHz and possibly stabilize at 4.7GHz. However, the required voltages and temperatures with your cooler are far from practical. It simply isn't worth the extra few frames.

If you manage to overclock and achieve a noticeable boost with acceptable performance, that's fine. But trying to push a PC solely for higher GHz numbers, while ignoring safety and responsibility, is essentially wasteful.