Wireless connection between points using a bridge technology
Wireless connection between points using a bridge technology
Locating a router or AP compatible with OpenWRT is straightforward, the main challenge lies in pairing it with an appropriate antenna.
I reside in a remote location, so my choices are mainly 300mbps APs, satellite internet, or mobile hotspot services. The fact that 60mbps doesn't bother me is because satellite or mobile connections are likely to be just as slow, if not slower. Would the link you shared work well? Since it's in the 200USD range, I don't think I'd be able to handle a DIY setup. The easy connection process seems appealing, but the cheaper options under 100USD per device appear more manageable.
I believe the initial link was more about an access point than a direct site-to-site wireless connection. The TP Link device is actually the kind of equipment you’re seeking. It clearly mentions compatibility with WISP systems, indicating it should suit your needs. As others have noted, it employs an older wireless protocol, which may limit speed. The first link shared by @kirashi appears to be an overkill option. On the other hand, the second link focuses on AirFiber products, which seem to perform well in practice. Many of these use 5GHz instead of 2.4GHz, offering faster speeds. Higher frequency bands provide better performance, even though they have shorter range and less interference. Devices like Bluetooth, microwaves, cordless phones, and many wireless gadgets operate on 2.4GHz because it doesn’t need special licensing. 5GHz tends to have fewer devices using it, but coverage remains strong in many areas. Ultimately, it depends on two main factors: the speed you need and your expectations for performance.
The owner of the first building confirmed he covers gigabit internet, yet my connection via his Ethernet cable only reaches about 100Mbps. For smooth multiplayer gaming like CS:GO, Overwatch, or Runescape, latency is a concern. Switching to satellite or mobile hotspot might be more practical if speed is essential.
That would likely cost more, wouldn't it? Would it be insane to attempt climbing a tree next to the second building and setting up an AP there?
I don't know how tall are the buildings os the trees, that's why I'm asking. If you have a flat terrain between the buildings and the trees are short a simple pole can do the job, but if the second building is down the hill and there are giant sequoias between them it's quite another situation.
There are some serious concerns about performance. Mobile connections tend to have high ping times, especially on slower networks. I tested my phone and T-Mobile gave me around 27ms latency, 60 Mbps speed, and about 2 seconds for uploads. Comcast offered much lower ping—around 10ms, which is typical for cable. Fiber usually provides even better results. Mobile speeds can fluctuate and depend on the provider, sometimes with data caps or throttling. Hotspot usage in the US is often treated differently than regular phone data, and T-Mobile’s 20GB limit before dropping to 3G is quite restrictive. Satellite internet also has usage limits and slower speeds, especially after the cap is reached. Overall, these differences highlight the importance of choosing the right service for your needs.
The second structure is on a slope, I haven’t attempted scaling the tree yet, but the one in my mind seems quite high so it could offer a clear view. Would this be feasible? To operate it, I’d just require an Ethernet connection from the building to the device using a PoE adapter?