F5F Stay Refreshed Software Operating Systems Windows Aero Performance Dilemma

Windows Aero Performance Dilemma

Windows Aero Performance Dilemma

F
FazeGames
Member
195
04-15-2016, 10:02 PM
#1
I possess two distinct setups: a Dell Inspiron 530s and a Lenovo Thinkcenter (model uncertain). Dell Inspiron 530s features Intel Core 2 Duo E7400 at 2.8GHz Dual Core XFX, AMD Radeon HD 5450 with 1GB GDDR3 and 3GB RAM (long tale). Lenovo uses Intel Pentium E5500 @ 2.8GHz Dual Core Intel G41 Graphics with 4GB RAM, scoring 6 in gaming graphics and 4.2 in Windows Aero. The Lenovo earns 3.5 for gaming but 4.3 in Windows Aero. My inquiry is, how can a subpar integrated card outperform a better PCIe graphics card under Windows Aero? Dell: Lenovo:
F
FazeGames
04-15-2016, 10:02 PM #1

I possess two distinct setups: a Dell Inspiron 530s and a Lenovo Thinkcenter (model uncertain). Dell Inspiron 530s features Intel Core 2 Duo E7400 at 2.8GHz Dual Core XFX, AMD Radeon HD 5450 with 1GB GDDR3 and 3GB RAM (long tale). Lenovo uses Intel Pentium E5500 @ 2.8GHz Dual Core Intel G41 Graphics with 4GB RAM, scoring 6 in gaming graphics and 4.2 in Windows Aero. The Lenovo earns 3.5 for gaming but 4.3 in Windows Aero. My inquiry is, how can a subpar integrated card outperform a better PCIe graphics card under Windows Aero? Dell: Lenovo:

E
EVGRClutch
Member
245
04-17-2016, 09:36 AM
#2
Intel integrated graphics serve as the standard for Aero mode. On my older motherboard, the G33 graphics paired with the Quadro NVS 110M in a Windows Aero laptop produced great results, while the Quadro also featured 256MB of vRAM and offered more power compared to the GPU.
E
EVGRClutch
04-17-2016, 09:36 AM #2

Intel integrated graphics serve as the standard for Aero mode. On my older motherboard, the G33 graphics paired with the Quadro NVS 110M in a Windows Aero laptop produced great results, while the Quadro also featured 256MB of vRAM and offered more power compared to the GPU.

M
Maliwan99
Senior Member
346
05-01-2016, 06:48 PM
#3
These numbers don't reflect anything meaningful.
M
Maliwan99
05-01-2016, 06:48 PM #3

These numbers don't reflect anything meaningful.

J
javosan
Member
76
05-02-2016, 07:03 AM
#4
these standards are commonly misunderstood, and they should be treated mainly as estimates rather than formal analysis.
J
javosan
05-02-2016, 07:03 AM #4

these standards are commonly misunderstood, and they should be treated mainly as estimates rather than formal analysis.

L
levoyageur92
Posting Freak
807
05-02-2016, 08:45 AM
#5
Windows performance standards on Windows 7 are terrible. They are not just wrong—they can be misleading in certain situations. That’s why they were eliminated in Windows 8.
L
levoyageur92
05-02-2016, 08:45 AM #5

Windows performance standards on Windows 7 are terrible. They are not just wrong—they can be misleading in certain situations. That’s why they were eliminated in Windows 8.