F5F Stay Refreshed Software Operating Systems Windows 10 is a pig, but for a lighter approach, consider simplifying your setup.

Windows 10 is a pig, but for a lighter approach, consider simplifying your setup.

Windows 10 is a pig, but for a lighter approach, consider simplifying your setup.

R
ryan_TGB
Member
109
11-20-2016, 12:18 AM
#1
It seems you're looking for advice on optimizing Windows 10 performance to make it more efficient compared to CentOS. Many have explored tweaking settings, upgrading hardware, or using lightweight versions. Have you tried similar approaches before? Let me know if you'd like suggestions!
R
ryan_TGB
11-20-2016, 12:18 AM #1

It seems you're looking for advice on optimizing Windows 10 performance to make it more efficient compared to CentOS. Many have explored tweaking settings, upgrading hardware, or using lightweight versions. Have you tried similar approaches before? Let me know if you'd like suggestions!

E
Eduardo_GameOn
Posting Freak
921
11-20-2016, 12:50 AM
#2
Usage stays low at around 2.2GB when running Avast, Steam, EMET, Radeon Settings, and VeraCrypt. It jumps to about 2.8GB with Chrome. You mentioned needing to update ISO settings but feel the apps are cluttered—Cortana could help reduce the load.
E
Eduardo_GameOn
11-20-2016, 12:50 AM #2

Usage stays low at around 2.2GB when running Avast, Steam, EMET, Radeon Settings, and VeraCrypt. It jumps to about 2.8GB with Chrome. You mentioned needing to update ISO settings but feel the apps are cluttered—Cortana could help reduce the load.

S
SugarCandy21
Member
196
11-25-2016, 01:50 AM
#3
It seems everything looks fine, possibly even beneficial. It indicates you have sufficient RAM to keep open programs in memory. Several factors should be checked, including swap usage and page faults. There’s another metric I’m not sure of. You can find more details on MSDN or online blogs about how Windows manages RAM. Also, penguins do enjoy bacon.
S
SugarCandy21
11-25-2016, 01:50 AM #3

It seems everything looks fine, possibly even beneficial. It indicates you have sufficient RAM to keep open programs in memory. Several factors should be checked, including swap usage and page faults. There’s another metric I’m not sure of. You can find more details on MSDN or online blogs about how Windows manages RAM. Also, penguins do enjoy bacon.

A
AyeDeadpool
Junior Member
10
11-27-2016, 02:46 AM
#4
This tool is like a Swiss army knife and a spoon—versatile for many tasks.
A
AyeDeadpool
11-27-2016, 02:46 AM #4

This tool is like a Swiss army knife and a spoon—versatile for many tasks.

K
Kigasha
Member
52
11-28-2016, 06:46 AM
#5
All items are accessible. Your idle usage is approximately 1.1GB.
K
Kigasha
11-28-2016, 06:46 AM #5

All items are accessible. Your idle usage is approximately 1.1GB.

F
FazeGames
Member
195
11-28-2016, 08:44 AM
#6
F
FazeGames
11-28-2016, 08:44 AM #6

J
junebum
Junior Member
34
12-01-2016, 03:51 AM
#7
More RAM means Windows can utilize it better. Originally, RAM was intended for use. The change began with Vista. In older versions of XP, the operating system would try to save memory, causing issues like HDD instability and slow startup times when switching between applications. After playing a game and closing it, your desktop would take a long time to refresh because Windows was constantly moving data between RAM and storage. Since Vista, this problem has largely disappeared. Today, 4GB is the bare minimum, with 8GB becoming increasingly common. Having ample RAM creates a smoother, faster experience. Windows can store more data in RAM, which speeds up loading times. With features like Super Fetch, it preloads frequently used applications ahead of time, making them start quicker. Most Linux distributions still lag behind because they stick to traditional methods, whereas modern OSes aim for efficiency. Linux is often chosen for servers or embedded systems where a GUI isn’t essential. While some distros joke about this, the reality is that performance depends on your needs.

Windows excels when it has enough memory; otherwise, it struggles with heavy tasks. For laptops, this can be a real limitation, especially if you run demanding apps alongside light usage. However, for everyday computing, especially on budget machines, the difference is noticeable. Adding more RAM improves responsiveness and reduces lag. Modern systems even compress memory dynamically to save space, though this adds CPU overhead. If your hardware is weak—like an older Intel processor or limited storage—it can still cause performance hits. Still, Linux often performs well under these constraints, focusing on what matters most.
J
junebum
12-01-2016, 03:51 AM #7

More RAM means Windows can utilize it better. Originally, RAM was intended for use. The change began with Vista. In older versions of XP, the operating system would try to save memory, causing issues like HDD instability and slow startup times when switching between applications. After playing a game and closing it, your desktop would take a long time to refresh because Windows was constantly moving data between RAM and storage. Since Vista, this problem has largely disappeared. Today, 4GB is the bare minimum, with 8GB becoming increasingly common. Having ample RAM creates a smoother, faster experience. Windows can store more data in RAM, which speeds up loading times. With features like Super Fetch, it preloads frequently used applications ahead of time, making them start quicker. Most Linux distributions still lag behind because they stick to traditional methods, whereas modern OSes aim for efficiency. Linux is often chosen for servers or embedded systems where a GUI isn’t essential. While some distros joke about this, the reality is that performance depends on your needs.

Windows excels when it has enough memory; otherwise, it struggles with heavy tasks. For laptops, this can be a real limitation, especially if you run demanding apps alongside light usage. However, for everyday computing, especially on budget machines, the difference is noticeable. Adding more RAM improves responsiveness and reduces lag. Modern systems even compress memory dynamically to save space, though this adds CPU overhead. If your hardware is weak—like an older Intel processor or limited storage—it can still cause performance hits. Still, Linux often performs well under these constraints, focusing on what matters most.

F
Fretti0_YTB
Member
196
12-04-2016, 07:51 AM
#8
3 Gigs. Look at this guy talking about 3 Gigs. LOL. During my normal use of Windows 10 I used at least 40% of my 16 gigs. Windows 10 caches a lot of shit in ram. Such as software you use most often, so you system can seem more responsive. If your worried about ram, just add more, you can never have too much.
F
Fretti0_YTB
12-04-2016, 07:51 AM #8

3 Gigs. Look at this guy talking about 3 Gigs. LOL. During my normal use of Windows 10 I used at least 40% of my 16 gigs. Windows 10 caches a lot of shit in ram. Such as software you use most often, so you system can seem more responsive. If your worried about ram, just add more, you can never have too much.

B
BMO_Playz
Junior Member
6
12-04-2016, 08:03 AM
#9
Windows stores a large chunk of RAM to boost its own operations, yet it tends to release unused space when programs need more. On my Intel Atom setup with 2 GB, idle consumption sits between 700 MB and 1 GB. After intense browser sessions, fully utilizing the memory, then shutting down, usage briefly falls under 400 MB before gradually rising again. Observing how Windows handles memory shortages is fascinating. Certain systems manage well even with just 1 GB.
B
BMO_Playz
12-04-2016, 08:03 AM #9

Windows stores a large chunk of RAM to boost its own operations, yet it tends to release unused space when programs need more. On my Intel Atom setup with 2 GB, idle consumption sits between 700 MB and 1 GB. After intense browser sessions, fully utilizing the memory, then shutting down, usage briefly falls under 400 MB before gradually rising again. Observing how Windows handles memory shortages is fascinating. Certain systems manage well even with just 1 GB.