Which is better, EK Predator 360 or Swiftech H320 X2 Prestige?
Which is better, EK Predator 360 or Swiftech H320 X2 Prestige?
4Ryan6 :
Low FPI rads are built for lower RPM fans, they aim for quieter operation and typically, fans with lower FPI don’t gain much advantage from faster or higher CFM fans beyond a certain threshold. Most cooling systems already offer well-matched fans for optimal results.
High FPI rads don’t always need high static pressure fans; it depends on the radiator core thickness, which is often the key factor in overclocking considerations.
A thicker radiator core requires more static pressure to maintain a good airflow through the fin grids and effectively dissipate heat.
A high FPI rating on a 20mm thick radiator can handle high RPM but with low static pressure fans, it works fine—depends on the core’s actual thickness.
There’s an exception though; the Alphacool Monsta is a low FPI model that demands high static pressure to achieve maximum cooling, due to its 75mm core.
You’re right.
I still don’t understand how this fits with the idea of needing more than 240 rads just for CPU cooling.
For GPU cooling, I wouldn’t compromise, but for even overclocked CPUs, a decent 120/140 rad would suffice.
You're right.
I still don't understand how it contradicts that cooling only the CPU requires more than 240 rad. I wouldn't settle for less for GPU cooling, but for (even overclocked) CPU I'd be fine with good 120/140 rad. It really depends on how far the OP wants to push the CPU and keep it stable. The further the CPU is overclocked, the more radiator cooling is needed to handle the extra heat from the overclock. A 360 offers a bit more stability during higher overclocks than a 240. When you mention this, your idea of CPU overclocking seems quite limited, but with today's CPUs, if you can't get a 1ghz overclock on stock speed, you're not really pushing it. The main focus should be whether the CPU load temperatures are acceptable for long-term stability.
The outcome really hinges on how far the OP wants to push the CPU overclock while keeping it fully stable. The more the CPU is pushed beyond its stock limits, the greater the need for additional cooling to manage the extra heat. A 360 offers slightly better stability compared to a 240. Your idea of modest CPU overclocking seems reasonable, but with modern processors, achieving a 1ghz boost on stock clocks isn't really pushing it—so you might not be truly overclocking. The main concern should be whether your CPU temperatures stay within safe limits during operation. It looks like you're aiming for maximum performance despite the heat, which is a common approach in hot environments where ambient temps can reach 35°C and AC isn't always running. For me, a reasonable jump to 500-1000MHz without pushing voltage too high is acceptable as long as the cores stay under 70°C at 30°C outside. It seems you're prioritizing speed over comfort, which makes sense given the conditions.
It looks like you're the kind of person who goes all out with overclocking. I'm in a warm place where the room temperature can reach 35°C. The AC isn't always running, so for me, pushing the CPU to 500-1000MHz is fine as long as the temps stay under 70°C at 30°C outside. I don't think extra 100MHz adds much value if it means spending more time and money. Yeah, I'm that type who "squeezes" for the best performance. Your comment makes sense, but where you live?