F5F Stay Refreshed Software PC Gaming Which CPU model offers better performance for gaming?

Which CPU model offers better performance for gaming?

Which CPU model offers better performance for gaming?

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
M
Mexassassin07
Member
50
10-14-2016, 08:02 AM
#1
Hey there! You're just starting out with PCs, that's great! For a gaming build with an i3 6100 and a GTX 950, an i5 6500 could be a solid choice. It should still give you decent performance for most modern games at medium to high settings. The extra $80 might be worth it if you're looking for a balance between cost and power.
M
Mexassassin07
10-14-2016, 08:02 AM #1

Hey there! You're just starting out with PCs, that's great! For a gaming build with an i3 6100 and a GTX 950, an i5 6500 could be a solid choice. It should still give you decent performance for most modern games at medium to high settings. The extra $80 might be worth it if you're looking for a balance between cost and power.

A
alleop
Junior Member
21
10-14-2016, 01:36 PM
#2
I'll find the i3 model priced around 950. Also, consider replacing the 950 with an RX 470 or GTX 1050 Ti.
A
alleop
10-14-2016, 01:36 PM #2

I'll find the i3 model priced around 950. Also, consider replacing the 950 with an RX 470 or GTX 1050 Ti.

M
MaciekPL2010
Junior Member
3
10-14-2016, 07:54 PM
#3
Yes, hyper-threading could help you run those newer games that need four cores, though performance depends on your system's capabilities.
M
MaciekPL2010
10-14-2016, 07:54 PM #3

Yes, hyper-threading could help you run those newer games that need four cores, though performance depends on your system's capabilities.

E
elliottrg
Member
70
10-14-2016, 09:47 PM
#4
No
E
elliottrg
10-14-2016, 09:47 PM #4

No

M
monkeyboo2004
Member
117
10-14-2016, 11:17 PM
#5
Games interpret an i3 as having four processing cores, enabling them to run demanding titles like Far Cry 4 efficiently because of its hyperthreading capabilities.
M
monkeyboo2004
10-14-2016, 11:17 PM #5

Games interpret an i3 as having four processing cores, enabling them to run demanding titles like Far Cry 4 efficiently because of its hyperthreading capabilities.

R
reactscarface
Member
156
10-15-2016, 04:41 AM
#6
I wasn't aware of that before, thanks. However, even with hyperthreading, your CPU remains a dual-core processor, which could cause issues in more demanding games.
R
reactscarface
10-15-2016, 04:41 AM #6

I wasn't aware of that before, thanks. However, even with hyperthreading, your CPU remains a dual-core processor, which could cause issues in more demanding games.

K
Karmageddon
Member
229
10-16-2016, 10:21 PM
#7
Most CPU problems in games stem from weak optimization or inefficient engines that don’t utilize the processor well. Simply upgrading to a better CPU isn’t always effective; unlocked models only offer marginal improvement. Games that heavily rely on CPU performance are uncommon. i5 is essential when paired with faster GPUs, but not necessary for entry-level systems. For high-end GPUs, i3 is sufficient. It’s far superior to have an i3 with a 1050 Ti and 4 GB RAM rather than an i5 with a weak 950 and just 2 GB. In 99% of cases, i3+1050Ti performs better than i5+950. Of course, i5 remains valuable but especially unlocked models are more cost-effective, particularly on a tight budget, while still delivering solid performance for entry-level hardware.
K
Karmageddon
10-16-2016, 10:21 PM #7

Most CPU problems in games stem from weak optimization or inefficient engines that don’t utilize the processor well. Simply upgrading to a better CPU isn’t always effective; unlocked models only offer marginal improvement. Games that heavily rely on CPU performance are uncommon. i5 is essential when paired with faster GPUs, but not necessary for entry-level systems. For high-end GPUs, i3 is sufficient. It’s far superior to have an i3 with a 1050 Ti and 4 GB RAM rather than an i5 with a weak 950 and just 2 GB. In 99% of cases, i3+1050Ti performs better than i5+950. Of course, i5 remains valuable but especially unlocked models are more cost-effective, particularly on a tight budget, while still delivering solid performance for entry-level hardware.

T
TQ_Dani28
Junior Member
45
10-16-2016, 11:03 PM
#8
However, it remains much less efficient than an i5. See Luke's BF1 results for a clear illustration.
T
TQ_Dani28
10-16-2016, 11:03 PM #8

However, it remains much less efficient than an i5. See Luke's BF1 results for a clear illustration.

K
kittymitty69
Member
190
10-26-2016, 10:14 PM
#9
The i5 is justified at an additional $80 unless you're extremely tight on funds.
K
kittymitty69
10-26-2016, 10:14 PM #9

The i5 is justified at an additional $80 unless you're extremely tight on funds.

S
56
10-26-2016, 11:25 PM
#10
Hyperthreading will always fall short as a real core; you should anticipate roughly half the performance of a hyperthread versus a single core. An i3 will only match 60-75% of an i5's capabilities.
S
Sleepwalker667
10-26-2016, 11:25 PM #10

Hyperthreading will always fall short as a real core; you should anticipate roughly half the performance of a hyperthread versus a single core. An i3 will only match 60-75% of an i5's capabilities.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next