F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop WHEA 19 running at 1966 FCLK and above

WHEA 19 running at 1966 FCLK and above

WHEA 19 running at 1966 FCLK and above

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next
L
lukemon5
Member
87
11-24-2025, 06:51 AM
#11
Some tests were done, yet not uniformly. Y cruncher, for example, regardless of configuration, my chip (early 2021 5900X) would lag significantly above 1900MHz FCLK, especially with the memory controller at that speed. The 3DMark CPU score would drop to around 1966MHz FCLK, particularly if I pushed the 1.8V rail beyond safe limits—but not higher. I’d avoid this outside competitive testing; it’s just too costly and unlikely to make a difference.
L
lukemon5
11-24-2025, 06:51 AM #11

Some tests were done, yet not uniformly. Y cruncher, for example, regardless of configuration, my chip (early 2021 5900X) would lag significantly above 1900MHz FCLK, especially with the memory controller at that speed. The 3DMark CPU score would drop to around 1966MHz FCLK, particularly if I pushed the 1.8V rail beyond safe limits—but not higher. I’d avoid this outside competitive testing; it’s just too costly and unlikely to make a difference.

Q
quiher45
Junior Member
3
11-24-2025, 09:53 AM
#12
Same here. Just know with this, it can be a chance to learn and improve your own FCLK/RAM tweaking skills. You'll fail far more than you'll succeed in achieving stable settings along the way (Of course) BUT once you get it all figured it, it's a snap vs how it was before. I can vouch for that and TBH I've got alot to learn yet myself about it. I can get my DDR cranking at 600+ sometimes since TCCD is capable of way more than DDR450 speeds..... Like I did earlier this year with a Super PI run. The limitation spelled out was most likely with BH5 ran with a Socket A but even those would normally hit at least DDR460 without issue in the right boards. Now - With a VIA/SiS chipset I can see how that wasn't going to happen. I guess I'm glad I always ran NF2 boards, those rarely gave me problems getting there as long as the CPU was capable itself.
Q
quiher45
11-24-2025, 09:53 AM #12

Same here. Just know with this, it can be a chance to learn and improve your own FCLK/RAM tweaking skills. You'll fail far more than you'll succeed in achieving stable settings along the way (Of course) BUT once you get it all figured it, it's a snap vs how it was before. I can vouch for that and TBH I've got alot to learn yet myself about it. I can get my DDR cranking at 600+ sometimes since TCCD is capable of way more than DDR450 speeds..... Like I did earlier this year with a Super PI run. The limitation spelled out was most likely with BH5 ran with a Socket A but even those would normally hit at least DDR460 without issue in the right boards. Now - With a VIA/SiS chipset I can see how that wasn't going to happen. I guess I'm glad I always ran NF2 boards, those rarely gave me problems getting there as long as the CPU was capable itself.

K
kulan3
Member
174
12-01-2025, 04:01 AM
#13
It's frustrating, but VDDG isn't working properly on the AGESA version I'm using. The only stable BIOS that supports my CPU on GIGABYTE boards is this one, and newer versions are still causing the same problem. I'll have to wait for AMD to release an update.
K
kulan3
12-01-2025, 04:01 AM #13

It's frustrating, but VDDG isn't working properly on the AGESA version I'm using. The only stable BIOS that supports my CPU on GIGABYTE boards is this one, and newer versions are still causing the same problem. I'll have to wait for AMD to release an update.

T
Tenniskoppens
Member
183
12-01-2025, 05:52 AM
#14
You're asking about the board and RAM specifications. If you're aiming for over 5000, it should help reduce sync clock performance issues.
T
Tenniskoppens
12-01-2025, 05:52 AM #14

You're asking about the board and RAM specifications. If you're aiming for over 5000, it should help reduce sync clock performance issues.

K
Kaden4y
Member
191
12-07-2025, 04:01 AM
#15
It's frustrating dealing with such issues all the time.
K
Kaden4y
12-07-2025, 04:01 AM #15

It's frustrating dealing with such issues all the time.

S
Silberflug
Member
203
12-14-2025, 11:18 AM
#16
I can handle FCLK at 1966MHz without losing speed, and actually see a boost. It only gives me about 3 WHEAs each minute with that setup.
S
Silberflug
12-14-2025, 11:18 AM #16

I can handle FCLK at 1966MHz without losing speed, and actually see a boost. It only gives me about 3 WHEAs each minute with that setup.

_
_McLOL
Junior Member
2
12-14-2025, 04:25 PM
#17
Usually at DDR600 I experience a BSOD each time I click the mouse to begin a run... but sometimes I manage to avoid it.
_
_McLOL
12-14-2025, 04:25 PM #17

Usually at DDR600 I experience a BSOD each time I click the mouse to begin a run... but sometimes I manage to avoid it.

R
Riggsock
Member
173
12-14-2025, 08:49 PM
#18
I tested a 2:1 speed setting to check the maximum RAM speed on this board, which reached 4400MHz. For 5000MHz I’ll need a more powerful motherboard.
R
Riggsock
12-14-2025, 08:49 PM #18

I tested a 2:1 speed setting to check the maximum RAM speed on this board, which reached 4400MHz. For 5000MHz I’ll need a more powerful motherboard.

J
JustRhune
Member
199
12-14-2025, 10:41 PM
#19
Adjusted primaries, trfc, set vttddr around 700mv, and added 1.6v with the fan.
J
JustRhune
12-14-2025, 10:41 PM #19

Adjusted primaries, trfc, set vttddr around 700mv, and added 1.6v with the fan.

G
Greeny79
Member
57
12-31-2025, 11:34 PM
#20
the voltage control knob reaches a maximum of 1.5 volts
G
Greeny79
12-31-2025, 11:34 PM #20

the voltage control knob reaches a maximum of 1.5 volts

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next