What’s your opinion of this computer setup?
What’s your opinion of this computer setup?
I'm curious if my computer setup can consistently deliver over 60 frames per second in graphically demanding games at 1080p resolution.
Components:
Motherboard: MSI B450 Gaming Plus
Memory: Corsair Vengeance LPX 3000 MHz (2x8GB)
Processor: AMD Ryzen 5 2600
CPU Cooler: CoolerMaster Hyper 212 Red LED
Graphics Card: ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1060 6GB AMP Edition
Power Supply: Corsair CX600
Hard Drive: Seagate Barracuda 1 TB
Solid State Drive: Kingston 240 GB A400
Case: Corsair Spec 01
Monitor: Asus VG248QE 144Hz Gaming Monitor (TN Panel)
Mouse: Logitech G402
Keyboard: Gigabyte Mechanical Keyboard
Headset: Asus Cerberus
I’m concerned about my processor choice. Numerous people have advised me to choose an Intel solution, which I opted to prioritize instead. Therefore, should I be anxious regarding second-generation Ryzen processors? And if so, would switching to Intel be a viable option?
I initially selected the Ryzen system due to its compatibility with the AM4 socket, offering potential for future upgrades.
While Intel generally offers a marginal advantage in gaming performance, this difference is minimal and comes at a significant cost. The Ryzen 5 2600 delivers performance nearly equivalent to the Intel Core i7-8700K, while costing half as much.
[https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/AMD/...00/13.html](https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/AMD/...00/13.html)
Historically, Intel processors were the dominant choice; however, AMD has made substantial progress and Intel’s advancements have been limited…
This represents an acceptable entry-level configuration, featuring a 1060 graphics card at 60Hz/1080p resolution. However, you shouldn’t anticipate achieving higher frame rates than 60fps in current high-fidelity titles. The 1060 is becoming outdated as games increasingly require more processing power. If your budget allows, upgrading to a 2060 would significantly extend the lifespan of your system. Furthermore, the included stock cooler for the 2600 processor suggests prioritizing investment in the graphics card rather than purchasing an aftermarket CPU cooler.
I’m having trouble locating a precise cost for the Asus VG258Q. I'm considering swapping out my current display with this model because it supports NVIDIA G-Sync. Is it a suitable upgrade? Could you also provide its price? Most sources indicate it’s approximately $300, but I need to find one that’s close to the cost of the Asus VG248QE, which is currently under $300.
Regarding @feelinfroggy777,
Since 1060 equates to 1080 divided by 60Hz, do you believe a 144Hz monitor offers any significant advantage? I wasn't entirely clear on your previous statement; could you please explain further? Specifically, what does 1080p/60Hz represent? Furthermore, this is my financial limit – I’m unable to exceed it.
Thank you for your interest in Seagate. Don't hesitate to contact us if you have any inquiries regarding the hard drive. We’ve also attached the data sheet and user manual for your reference.
Chandler_bing_25:
To @feelinfroggy777,
considering that 1080Hz is equivalent to 1080 divided by 60Hz, does purchasing a 144Hz display truly offer any advantage? I didn’t quite grasp your initial statement; could you please clarify? Specifically, what does “1080p/60Hz” signify?
My budget presents a limitation – I cannot exceed this amount. For demanding AAA titles, the 1060 typically achieves only 60 frames per second at 1080p resolution. Therefore, investing in a 144Hz monitor would be somewhat pointless. However, older games and smaller indie titles will likely run more smoothly, presenting a positive aspect. I recommend prioritizing a quality monitor, as they tend to have a lifespan of ten years or longer – considerably exceeding that of other components.
If your finances allow, opting for the 2060 alongside a 144Hz monitor would be ideal. You wouldn’t require G-Sync; Adaptive Sync now functions with Nvidia graphics cards. If both aren’t feasible, selecting the 1060 with a 144Hz display remains a viable option, providing satisfactory performance presently and allowing for future GPU upgrades to fully utilize your high refresh rate monitor.
My concern centers on the processor. Numerous individuals, essentially everyone, advised me to opt for Intel. I chose to allocate my budget there while investing more heavily in the graphics card. Consequently, should I be anxious about second-generation Ryzen processors? And if so, would it be prudent to transition to Intel alternatives?
I selected Ryzen due to its compatibility with the AM4 socket, offering a degree of adaptability for potential future CPU upgrades.
I’m concerned about the processor. Numerous people have advised me to choose Intel, and I opted to invest my funds in the graphics card instead. Therefore, should I be apprehensive regarding second-generation Ryzen CPUs? And if so, would switching to Intel processors be a viable option?
I initially selected Ryzen because it utilizes the AM4 socket, offering future upgrade possibilities.
Intel does possess a marginal advantage in gaming speed, though this difference is minimal and comes at a significant cost. The Ryzen 5 2600 nearly matches the performance of the Intel Core i7-8700K within 10% of frames per second, while costing half as much.
[https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/AMD/...00/13.html](https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/AMD/...00/13.html)
Historically, Intel CPUs were the preferred choice. However, AMD has made substantial progress, and Intel’s development has remained relatively static. Selecting Intel is no longer strictly necessary. Current-generation processors are more than sufficient for gaming in 2019. Performance levels are remarkably similar. Nevertheless, upgrading to a higher-end graphics card can yield performance improvements of 25-50%. No CPU currently available can provide such a substantial boost in gaming performance compared to the Ryzen 5 2600.