F5F Stay Refreshed Software PC Gaming What do you guys make of this? (a Witcher 3 and overclocking story)

What do you guys make of this? (a Witcher 3 and overclocking story)

What do you guys make of this? (a Witcher 3 and overclocking story)

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
K
kousgoose
Member
52
06-28-2016, 03:03 AM
#1
I'm facing issues with the R9 280 when playing Witcher 3 on Ultra settings, even after overclocking. It worked fine without water, foliage, or Hairworks. Still, I hit around 24 FPS in forests. I lowered the resolution to 900p, but it didn’t help much. Eventually, I upgraded my card further and increased the clock speed from 1100Mhz to 1175Mhz. My performance jumped from 24 to 31 FPS, staying above 40 FPS most of the time! While benchmarks only showed a small gain, my minimum FPS on Witcher 3 rose by about 30%. This is the only game I've noticed such a big boost from VRAM speed. How does this game handle VRAM so well? Have others experienced it?
K
kousgoose
06-28-2016, 03:03 AM #1

I'm facing issues with the R9 280 when playing Witcher 3 on Ultra settings, even after overclocking. It worked fine without water, foliage, or Hairworks. Still, I hit around 24 FPS in forests. I lowered the resolution to 900p, but it didn’t help much. Eventually, I upgraded my card further and increased the clock speed from 1100Mhz to 1175Mhz. My performance jumped from 24 to 31 FPS, staying above 40 FPS most of the time! While benchmarks only showed a small gain, my minimum FPS on Witcher 3 rose by about 30%. This is the only game I've noticed such a big boost from VRAM speed. How does this game handle VRAM so well? Have others experienced it?

N
Nixelord03
Member
182
06-28-2016, 03:27 AM
#2
Perhaps reduce the graphics?
N
Nixelord03
06-28-2016, 03:27 AM #2

Perhaps reduce the graphics?

V
ViShuMyName
Member
74
06-30-2016, 08:58 AM
#3
In tests, every resource is already loaded, which means it's shown much more clearly.
V
ViShuMyName
06-30-2016, 08:58 AM #3

In tests, every resource is already loaded, which means it's shown much more clearly.

G
Gevo_davo
Junior Member
2
06-30-2016, 03:37 PM
#4
L-L-L-Lower the graphics?! BLASPHEMY!!!
G
Gevo_davo
06-30-2016, 03:37 PM #4

L-L-L-Lower the graphics?! BLASPHEMY!!!

N
Nienke_2002
Senior Member
621
07-02-2016, 02:43 PM
#5
Reduce or enhance, there aren't many choices available.
N
Nienke_2002
07-02-2016, 02:43 PM #5

Reduce or enhance, there aren't many choices available.

B
BoxelArc
Member
190
07-08-2016, 10:29 PM
#6
However, there was another choice available. I pushed the speed further and achieved unexpected outcomes. Check out the full article.
B
BoxelArc
07-08-2016, 10:29 PM #6

However, there was another choice available. I pushed the speed further and achieved unexpected outcomes. Check out the full article.

N
210
07-14-2016, 09:06 AM
#7
Recheck the information carefully. It seems the statement is about performance improvements linked to texture units and memory speed.
N
NotTomZuper666
07-14-2016, 09:06 AM #7

Recheck the information carefully. It seems the statement is about performance improvements linked to texture units and memory speed.

S
soul_harveste
Member
223
07-14-2016, 09:12 AM
#8
It seems the graphics card handled things well with only 1.5Gb of VRAM. That makes sense as a solid explanation.
S
soul_harveste
07-14-2016, 09:12 AM #8

It seems the graphics card handled things well with only 1.5Gb of VRAM. That makes sense as a solid explanation.

M
matou38360
Member
68
07-14-2016, 02:55 PM
#9
Currently, 1250 MHz performance isn't ideal for memory usage. Latest graphics cards often reach around 1750 MHz.
M
matou38360
07-14-2016, 02:55 PM #9

Currently, 1250 MHz performance isn't ideal for memory usage. Latest graphics cards often reach around 1750 MHz.

T
Thesnake9
Member
160
07-14-2016, 03:19 PM
#10
AMD memory performance varies, your 970 at 2100MHz runs slower around 1300MHz compared to its specs.
T
Thesnake9
07-14-2016, 03:19 PM #10

AMD memory performance varies, your 970 at 2100MHz runs slower around 1300MHz compared to its specs.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next