F5F Stay Refreshed Software PC Gaming Watch Dogs supports multi-threaded gameplay. For optimal performance, a mid-range to high-end CPU works well.

Watch Dogs supports multi-threaded gameplay. For optimal performance, a mid-range to high-end CPU works well.

Watch Dogs supports multi-threaded gameplay. For optimal performance, a mid-range to high-end CPU works well.

S
SrSniper28
Member
231
06-03-2016, 01:39 AM
#1
Hi, you're using an Intel i5 2310 with 8GB DDR3 and a GTX 760 GPU. You've upgraded to an AMD FX 8120/8320 and are looking to get ready for next-gen gaming on a budget. Many recommend moving to an AMD Ryzen 9 or 10 for better multi-threaded performance, especially since newer games like Watch Dogs and GTA V rely heavily on CPU multithreading. While the FX 8120 may not be ideal for older titles, it still offers solid performance for modern games thanks to its multiple cores. If you want to stay within your budget, consider upgrading to a Ryzen 5 or 7 instead of the FX lineup. This way, you'll get better multithreading support without breaking the bank.
S
SrSniper28
06-03-2016, 01:39 AM #1

Hi, you're using an Intel i5 2310 with 8GB DDR3 and a GTX 760 GPU. You've upgraded to an AMD FX 8120/8320 and are looking to get ready for next-gen gaming on a budget. Many recommend moving to an AMD Ryzen 9 or 10 for better multi-threaded performance, especially since newer games like Watch Dogs and GTA V rely heavily on CPU multithreading. While the FX 8120 may not be ideal for older titles, it still offers solid performance for modern games thanks to its multiple cores. If you want to stay within your budget, consider upgrading to a Ryzen 5 or 7 instead of the FX lineup. This way, you'll get better multithreading support without breaking the bank.

X
xInfernoDragon
Junior Member
3
06-03-2016, 09:49 PM
#2
You’ll be fine for the next three years with that processor. Watch dogs isn’t exciting, and you’ve been playing through half of it already.
X
xInfernoDragon
06-03-2016, 09:49 PM #2

You’ll be fine for the next three years with that processor. Watch dogs isn’t exciting, and you’ve been playing through half of it already.

D
DrummerBoyNo
Junior Member
1
06-03-2016, 11:35 PM
#3
The issue with using AMD right now is their chip sets are quite outdated, making a switch to one of their eight-core models a relatively minor change. Their next major release isn't expected until 2016 at the latest. Eight-core models can handle tasks adequately, though they aren't as fast as Intel's single-core performance—so even an i5 will outperform an 8350, which is more affordable. Watch Dogs is particularly demanding for multithreading and was poorly optimized, similar to many recent Ubisoft titles. I recommend opting for a strong i5 like the 4690K, which offers a solid four-core processor with ample room for overclocking and should remain reliable for some time.
D
DrummerBoyNo
06-03-2016, 11:35 PM #3

The issue with using AMD right now is their chip sets are quite outdated, making a switch to one of their eight-core models a relatively minor change. Their next major release isn't expected until 2016 at the latest. Eight-core models can handle tasks adequately, though they aren't as fast as Intel's single-core performance—so even an i5 will outperform an 8350, which is more affordable. Watch Dogs is particularly demanding for multithreading and was poorly optimized, similar to many recent Ubisoft titles. I recommend opting for a strong i5 like the 4690K, which offers a solid four-core processor with ample room for overclocking and should remain reliable for some time.

D
Doctor_Pi
Member
214
06-04-2016, 01:05 AM
#4
Choose an i5 4960K or a non-K processor if you don’t intend to boost its speed. Remember, there’s no true “next-gen” in PCs—quality has improved steadily over time, with only occasional exceptions like Crysis. Check some benchmark results to figure out your desired performance level, then estimate what you need. Be cautious though, because future hardware changes are unpredictable; most upgrades are just small improvements, and current trends show a slow rise in requirements without major jumps. Hardware specs have been climbing gently lately, and it seems unlikely we’ll see significant leaps soon unless there’s a major surprise from developers.
D
Doctor_Pi
06-04-2016, 01:05 AM #4

Choose an i5 4960K or a non-K processor if you don’t intend to boost its speed. Remember, there’s no true “next-gen” in PCs—quality has improved steadily over time, with only occasional exceptions like Crysis. Check some benchmark results to figure out your desired performance level, then estimate what you need. Be cautious though, because future hardware changes are unpredictable; most upgrades are just small improvements, and current trends show a slow rise in requirements without major jumps. Hardware specs have been climbing gently lately, and it seems unlikely we’ll see significant leaps soon unless there’s a major surprise from developers.

O
onelolo57
Member
62
06-04-2016, 01:17 PM
#5
Thanks for the help! The i5 4960 is quite pricey and exceeds my budget. I'm using the i5 2310 and looking for something better than that. Would it be worth upgrading to a more affordable option? Any other recommendations would be appreciated.
O
onelolo57
06-04-2016, 01:17 PM #5

Thanks for the help! The i5 4960 is quite pricey and exceeds my budget. I'm using the i5 2310 and looking for something better than that. Would it be worth upgrading to a more affordable option? Any other recommendations would be appreciated.

G
ghostlydigger
Senior Member
500
06-04-2016, 07:06 PM
#6
Visit the review page at the provided link and choose a model that matches your budget for an upgrade.
G
ghostlydigger
06-04-2016, 07:06 PM #6

Visit the review page at the provided link and choose a model that matches your budget for an upgrade.

T
TdmFan92
Senior Member
602
06-06-2016, 02:36 AM
#7
It operates on cosmic particles and hopeful imagination.
T
TdmFan92
06-06-2016, 02:36 AM #7

It operates on cosmic particles and hopeful imagination.

J
JenniferXD
Member
50
06-07-2016, 05:33 PM
#8
Your i5 2310 works fine, it's more than sufficient. If I were you, I'd keep it. Just a note—don't take your performance for granted if Watchdogs isn't running smoothly. A minor micro-stutter might occur, which is typical for Ubisoft titles.
J
JenniferXD
06-07-2016, 05:33 PM #8

Your i5 2310 works fine, it's more than sufficient. If I were you, I'd keep it. Just a note—don't take your performance for granted if Watchdogs isn't running smoothly. A minor micro-stutter might occur, which is typical for Ubisoft titles.