F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Networks Using no router for a short period is fine. It won’t affect your connection unless you rely heavily on it.

Using no router for a short period is fine. It won’t affect your connection unless you rely heavily on it.

Using no router for a short period is fine. It won’t affect your connection unless you rely heavily on it.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
M
Matke04
Posting Freak
825
08-10-2021, 09:08 AM
#1
So, I'm thinking about heading to Best Buy and picking up a similar modem to what I was gonna buy from Amazon... A few months ago I was recommended to buy the ARRIS SURFboard SB6183 which supports speeds up to 686mbps, the one I'm looking at getting at best buy and just using exclusively for the interim until I have a little more money available to me to get a router. How unadvisable would it be to simply use the modem to get online until some money gets freed up? (I have the money to buy everything, it's just I've applied for a secured credit card and I'm waiting on that money to be withdrawn.) The one I'd get at best buy is a Netgear CM500-100NAS
M
Matke04
08-10-2021, 09:08 AM #1

So, I'm thinking about heading to Best Buy and picking up a similar modem to what I was gonna buy from Amazon... A few months ago I was recommended to buy the ARRIS SURFboard SB6183 which supports speeds up to 686mbps, the one I'm looking at getting at best buy and just using exclusively for the interim until I have a little more money available to me to get a router. How unadvisable would it be to simply use the modem to get online until some money gets freed up? (I have the money to buy everything, it's just I've applied for a secured credit card and I'm waiting on that money to be withdrawn.) The one I'd get at best buy is a Netgear CM500-100NAS

X
XxgamerxX1677
Member
214
08-10-2021, 01:01 PM
#2
Do you need a modem or a router? It seems like both work with DOSIS 3.0 and 686MBPS speeds, so they likely do similar things. They won’t function as a router either. Choose the most affordable option.
X
XxgamerxX1677
08-10-2021, 01:01 PM #2

Do you need a modem or a router? It seems like both work with DOSIS 3.0 and 686MBPS speeds, so they likely do similar things. They won’t function as a router either. Choose the most affordable option.

T
trisblin
Junior Member
15
08-11-2021, 06:31 AM
#3
You can still access the internet by connecting directly to the modem, though it’s not ideal. Just remember it’s not the safest or most convenient option.
T
trisblin
08-11-2021, 06:31 AM #3

You can still access the internet by connecting directly to the modem, though it’s not ideal. Just remember it’s not the safest or most convenient option.

A
ajaceave
Junior Member
8
08-11-2021, 07:23 PM
#4
With a single device, connecting via USB is perfectly acceptable. It’s not a big concern—just ensure the firewall is turned off if needed.
A
ajaceave
08-11-2021, 07:23 PM #4

With a single device, connecting via USB is perfectly acceptable. It’s not a big concern—just ensure the firewall is turned off if needed.

M
MaddiBlake
Member
241
08-11-2021, 11:53 PM
#5
I’d just connect my PC to it for a few weeks until some cash came in, then I could purchase a router.
M
MaddiBlake
08-11-2021, 11:53 PM #5

I’d just connect my PC to it for a few weeks until some cash came in, then I could purchase a router.

L
LanteanKnight
Member
52
08-12-2021, 03:57 AM
#6
The issue seems to be with the router itself. It might have been corrupted, so a reset could resolve the problem.
L
LanteanKnight
08-12-2021, 03:57 AM #6

The issue seems to be with the router itself. It might have been corrupted, so a reset could resolve the problem.

R
ReborntoKill
Posting Freak
821
08-12-2021, 04:10 AM
#7
I really wouldn't go that route. Even with Windows firewall in place, it isn't considered top-notch. I favor a dedicated hardware solution over software. Also, your PC might struggle with echo tests and port scans. Unlike a router, Windows reacts to specific actions on certain ports, which adds vulnerability. Personally, I'd avoid putting consumer devices in a forward-facing position.
R
ReborntoKill
08-12-2021, 04:10 AM #7

I really wouldn't go that route. Even with Windows firewall in place, it isn't considered top-notch. I favor a dedicated hardware solution over software. Also, your PC might struggle with echo tests and port scans. Unlike a router, Windows reacts to specific actions on certain ports, which adds vulnerability. Personally, I'd avoid putting consumer devices in a forward-facing position.

L
Lord_PaxX
Junior Member
8
08-12-2021, 11:13 AM
#8
This perspective comes from a layered security approach. A software firewall provides essential defense, but true cybersecurity requires additional safeguards to address other potential vulnerabilities.
L
Lord_PaxX
08-12-2021, 11:13 AM #8

This perspective comes from a layered security approach. A software firewall provides essential defense, but true cybersecurity requires additional safeguards to address other potential vulnerabilities.

T
TheBrianFox
Junior Member
4
08-13-2021, 03:21 AM
#9
Why assume the budget router firewall is sufficient? Stay calm—hacking isn’t immediate for everyone.
T
TheBrianFox
08-13-2021, 03:21 AM #9

Why assume the budget router firewall is sufficient? Stay calm—hacking isn’t immediate for everyone.

B
buckeyes2013
Junior Member
7
08-13-2021, 04:30 AM
#10
I understand that a physical security barrier is generally more reliable than a digital one. Many systems use ping masking to hide any activity from your address. Additionally, ports that aren’t active will automatically shut down and won’t answer requests unless specifically directed. This creates two levels of protection, meaning even if something gets through the first line, it must overcome the second too. There are many more methods to connect a consumer operating system to the internet than there are routers. For a clear example, perform a remote port scan against your firewall and then run the same test locally on your machine. Observe how much data each method reveals. A thorough Nessus scan with scripts can extract significantly more details.
B
buckeyes2013
08-13-2021, 04:30 AM #10

I understand that a physical security barrier is generally more reliable than a digital one. Many systems use ping masking to hide any activity from your address. Additionally, ports that aren’t active will automatically shut down and won’t answer requests unless specifically directed. This creates two levels of protection, meaning even if something gets through the first line, it must overcome the second too. There are many more methods to connect a consumer operating system to the internet than there are routers. For a clear example, perform a remote port scan against your firewall and then run the same test locally on your machine. Observe how much data each method reveals. A thorough Nessus scan with scripts can extract significantly more details.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next