F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Networks Use a 2x1GbE adapter to boost your modem's speed beyond 1.5GBps to achieve gigabit performance.

Use a 2x1GbE adapter to boost your modem's speed beyond 1.5GBps to achieve gigabit performance.

Use a 2x1GbE adapter to boost your modem's speed beyond 1.5GBps to achieve gigabit performance.

S
Strafeliner
Member
165
08-27-2016, 03:09 PM
#1
I recently upgraded my Bell Fibe to 1.5Gbps, but I didn’t realize the best modem only supports Gigabit Ethernet. Speed tests from PC with gbe show the limits. Could a Dual-Ethernet PCIe adapter (like the one you mentioned) connect directly to the modem to unlock the full 1.5Gbps in Windows 10 Pro? With four Ethernet ports, I’m okay cutting two for my main desktop—it’s the only device I need. I also rely on internal Wi-Fi since I live in a small apartment and don’t require higher speeds. Would installing it and the drivers be simple enough, or would advanced settings be necessary? Is this even possible on my system? Thanks!
S
Strafeliner
08-27-2016, 03:09 PM #1

I recently upgraded my Bell Fibe to 1.5Gbps, but I didn’t realize the best modem only supports Gigabit Ethernet. Speed tests from PC with gbe show the limits. Could a Dual-Ethernet PCIe adapter (like the one you mentioned) connect directly to the modem to unlock the full 1.5Gbps in Windows 10 Pro? With four Ethernet ports, I’m okay cutting two for my main desktop—it’s the only device I need. I also rely on internal Wi-Fi since I live in a small apartment and don’t require higher speeds. Would installing it and the drivers be simple enough, or would advanced settings be necessary? Is this even possible on my system? Thanks!

V
Vivi_love
Junior Member
4
08-27-2016, 06:39 PM
#2
I have no choice, but the odds lean against you. Any method to connect parallel interfaces would need both router and PC support, which I don’t believe is available for this scenario. If you needed this performance between two Windows PCs, it would be a different situation.
V
Vivi_love
08-27-2016, 06:39 PM #2

I have no choice, but the odds lean against you. Any method to connect parallel interfaces would need both router and PC support, which I don’t believe is available for this scenario. If you needed this performance between two Windows PCs, it would be a different situation.

K
Kqsmotic
Member
63
08-27-2016, 09:01 PM
#3
It's true, even with your efforts, it might not be worth it most of the time. The main goal is to stop one client from reaching full capacity, which is a positive outcome.
K
Kqsmotic
08-27-2016, 09:01 PM #3

It's true, even with your efforts, it might not be worth it most of the time. The main goal is to stop one client from reaching full capacity, which is a positive outcome.

E
Ellie_Mae_22
Junior Member
46
08-29-2016, 01:57 AM
#4
I share my space with my girlfriend, and I’m not too concerned about hogging my own connection. I need access to the bandwidth I’m paying for on one device. Even if I can’t reach the full 1.5gbps, I’m still using a full 1gbps, so I’d like to improve it to around 1.2gbps because of speed limits on writing. I want that connection since I’m paying for it. My Bell rep told me it works with server hardware using my same modem (HomeHub 3000), but they don’t know anyone in their residential clients tried it on a Windows 10 system instead of a full server. They also mentioned the modem supports dual or even triple Ethernet connections to one host if the host is ready.
E
Ellie_Mae_22
08-29-2016, 01:57 AM #4

I share my space with my girlfriend, and I’m not too concerned about hogging my own connection. I need access to the bandwidth I’m paying for on one device. Even if I can’t reach the full 1.5gbps, I’m still using a full 1gbps, so I’d like to improve it to around 1.2gbps because of speed limits on writing. I want that connection since I’m paying for it. My Bell rep told me it works with server hardware using my same modem (HomeHub 3000), but they don’t know anyone in their residential clients tried it on a Windows 10 system instead of a full server. They also mentioned the modem supports dual or even triple Ethernet connections to one host if the host is ready.

L
luluj2015
Member
188
08-29-2016, 02:39 AM
#5
The discussion refers to a one-to-many setup in a server environment, where many clients connect to a single server. This situation benefits from Link Aggregation or Bonding, which helps manage traffic efficiently. On the other hand, your scenario involves a one-to-one connection—where one host interacts with just one remote server. Even with a bonded link, you won't exceed 1Gbit per session because each session operates independently on its own dedicated wire. This is ideal if you can successfully implement the bonded connection.
L
luluj2015
08-29-2016, 02:39 AM #5

The discussion refers to a one-to-many setup in a server environment, where many clients connect to a single server. This situation benefits from Link Aggregation or Bonding, which helps manage traffic efficiently. On the other hand, your scenario involves a one-to-one connection—where one host interacts with just one remote server. Even with a bonded link, you won't exceed 1Gbit per session because each session operates independently on its own dedicated wire. This is ideal if you can successfully implement the bonded connection.

J
james26665
Senior Member
537
08-29-2016, 03:49 AM
#6
Balancing for Ethernet bonding can be tricky, but router load balancing offers advantages through concurrent downloads per connection. It's likely Ethernet is handled per client, so you won't see the same gains there. I doubt services like Steam rely on multiple connections, meaning most users stay limited to Gigabit speeds even with load balancing. You might consider using a second router and double-nat settings, or switching to WiFi with its own LAN to create the illusion of two separate connections. However, this approach adds complexity and may require extra software to force multi-threaded downloads in Windows.
J
james26665
08-29-2016, 03:49 AM #6

Balancing for Ethernet bonding can be tricky, but router load balancing offers advantages through concurrent downloads per connection. It's likely Ethernet is handled per client, so you won't see the same gains there. I doubt services like Steam rely on multiple connections, meaning most users stay limited to Gigabit speeds even with load balancing. You might consider using a second router and double-nat settings, or switching to WiFi with its own LAN to create the illusion of two separate connections. However, this approach adds complexity and may require extra software to force multi-threaded downloads in Windows.