F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Upgraded to Ryzen 3600X model

Upgraded to Ryzen 3600X model

Upgraded to Ryzen 3600X model

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
F
FTTank2008
Member
174
10-18-2019, 09:33 PM
#1
You're considering upgrading to a Ryzen 3600x for your 1700x. Given the improved single-thread performance and better IPC, you might see gains in gaming, especially at higher resolutions like 1440p. The GPU usage you mention could be due to the game prioritizing certain threads, but swapping should help overall efficiency. It's worth trying, particularly if lower FPS is a concern.
F
FTTank2008
10-18-2019, 09:33 PM #1

You're considering upgrading to a Ryzen 3600x for your 1700x. Given the improved single-thread performance and better IPC, you might see gains in gaming, especially at higher resolutions like 1440p. The GPU usage you mention could be due to the game prioritizing certain threads, but swapping should help overall efficiency. It's worth trying, particularly if lower FPS is a concern.

T
Texas1047
Posting Freak
889
10-19-2019, 09:46 PM
#2
It's completely free, and that's a big improvement. I'd definitely take it. If you're not interested, I'll pay ten times your price plus shipping.
T
Texas1047
10-19-2019, 09:46 PM #2

It's completely free, and that's a big improvement. I'd definitely take it. If you're not interested, I'll pay ten times your price plus shipping.

3
333LegenD333
Junior Member
46
10-20-2019, 10:25 AM
#3
The sole reason I wouldn’t be is if I was losing a lot of multi-threaded efficiency. I don’t want to "downgrade" from an 8-core setup to a 6-core one, but here it’s worth the trade-off. Think about it: $0 multiplied by 10 equals $0.
3
333LegenD333
10-20-2019, 10:25 AM #3

The sole reason I wouldn’t be is if I was losing a lot of multi-threaded efficiency. I don’t want to "downgrade" from an 8-core setup to a 6-core one, but here it’s worth the trade-off. Think about it: $0 multiplied by 10 equals $0.

D
DjReindeer5
Member
123
11-02-2019, 06:37 AM
#4
You likely won’t require eight cores, and six cores offering greater performance per clock and higher IPC will perform better for most tasks, particularly in gaming.
D
DjReindeer5
11-02-2019, 06:37 AM #4

You likely won’t require eight cores, and six cores offering greater performance per clock and higher IPC will perform better for most tasks, particularly in gaming.

M
MillyC
Junior Member
4
11-02-2019, 07:47 AM
#5
Absolutely correct, though occasionally the eight cores perform well depending on the number of programs I'm running simultaneously.
M
MillyC
11-02-2019, 07:47 AM #5

Absolutely correct, though occasionally the eight cores perform well depending on the number of programs I'm running simultaneously.

T
the456wii
Junior Member
4
11-16-2019, 02:39 PM
#6
I’m currently handling various tasks beyond just gaming, including running multiple applications that demand full utilization of a single core, and even more than two additional cores when needed.
T
the456wii
11-16-2019, 02:39 PM #6

I’m currently handling various tasks beyond just gaming, including running multiple applications that demand full utilization of a single core, and even more than two additional cores when needed.

D
dubdub112
Member
202
11-16-2019, 04:37 PM
#7
Most of my work now involves editing videos. The rest is just running several light programs at the same time, plus a lot of Chrome tabs.
D
dubdub112
11-16-2019, 04:37 PM #7

Most of my work now involves editing videos. The rest is just running several light programs at the same time, plus a lot of Chrome tabs.

U
Unoree
Member
161
11-17-2019, 06:31 AM
#8
Based on the use case, the 3600 may clash with the 2700X in certain video editing programs due to performance differences, speed adjustments, and logic updates. And you're probably thinking about bookmarks—right? Finish what you're working on, close it. Want it again? Open a new tab, click the bookmark? I don’t remember having more than 20 open unless I was comparing windows. Chrome uses relatively little CPU power, but you might want to allocate at least 64GB of RAM or more.
U
Unoree
11-17-2019, 06:31 AM #8

Based on the use case, the 3600 may clash with the 2700X in certain video editing programs due to performance differences, speed adjustments, and logic updates. And you're probably thinking about bookmarks—right? Finish what you're working on, close it. Want it again? Open a new tab, click the bookmark? I don’t remember having more than 20 open unless I was comparing windows. Chrome uses relatively little CPU power, but you might want to allocate at least 64GB of RAM or more.

T
TheTwins97
Junior Member
12
11-17-2019, 03:27 PM
#9
I also rely on bookmarks a lot—they’re mainly for reference when juggling many tech projects. It’s also true that I haven’t finished closing all my tabs and started over since around February. Plus, Chrome uses more memory than CPU.
T
TheTwins97
11-17-2019, 03:27 PM #9

I also rely on bookmarks a lot—they’re mainly for reference when juggling many tech projects. It’s also true that I haven’t finished closing all my tabs and started over since around February. Plus, Chrome uses more memory than CPU.

N
narwhal_62
Member
200
11-24-2019, 08:55 PM
#10
I’d definitely choose the 3600 option. Its performance is significantly improved in gaming, and you won’t experience much loss in multithreaded efficiency.
N
narwhal_62
11-24-2019, 08:55 PM #10

I’d definitely choose the 3600 option. Its performance is significantly improved in gaming, and you won’t experience much loss in multithreaded efficiency.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next