F5F Stay Refreshed Software Operating Systems Updating Windows 10 after disabling the Windows Update service Turn off the service, then restart and enable it again.

Updating Windows 10 after disabling the Windows Update service Turn off the service, then restart and enable it again.

Updating Windows 10 after disabling the Windows Update service Turn off the service, then restart and enable it again.

K
Kitty_Gaming23
Junior Member
21
02-13-2016, 11:51 AM
#1
I usually kept the Windows Update services off permanently. During a gaming session it unexpectedly asked me to restart so an update could install. Because I didn’t have a choice, I did it. Later I checked the Services view and saw it was back to "on," "running," and "automatic." I turned it off again. Now today it keeps appearing with the prompt about a new update and asking to restart. It continues this even though I disabled the Windows Update service.
K
Kitty_Gaming23
02-13-2016, 11:51 AM #1

I usually kept the Windows Update services off permanently. During a gaming session it unexpectedly asked me to restart so an update could install. Because I didn’t have a choice, I did it. Later I checked the Services view and saw it was back to "on," "running," and "automatic." I turned it off again. Now today it keeps appearing with the prompt about a new update and asking to restart. It continues this even though I disabled the Windows Update service.

S
sunofmars67
Member
78
02-14-2016, 05:49 PM
#2
Ensure updates remain active. To avoid them, disconnect your device from the internet.
S
sunofmars67
02-14-2016, 05:49 PM #2

Ensure updates remain active. To avoid them, disconnect your device from the internet.

W
Wat3rElemental
Junior Member
8
02-15-2016, 02:56 PM
#3
Windows 10 offers updated features and improvements for a smoother experience.
W
Wat3rElemental
02-15-2016, 02:56 PM #3

Windows 10 offers updated features and improvements for a smoother experience.

E
ElGuerrero064
Member
53
02-16-2016, 09:08 AM
#4
By nature malware interferes with your system without consent, isn't it? Windows 10 is now recognized as malware officially. This morning I was engaging in some activities, including playing a windowed game, when the Nvidia drivers failed and I had to restart. After rebooting, I noticed Windows was attempting an update during startup, which seemed illogical. Just a short while ago I captured this image: Thank you Microsoft for intentionally ignoring my settings and trapping me in this situation with no way out.

Once more facing this, I’m turning to Linux. It’s easier for gaming here, doesn’t it? I had intended to upgrade to creators but needed time and personal availability. Now I’m just using a VM for games, which seems to work better... strange. I planned to enable updates for creators, but required preparation and free time I wouldn’t otherwise have. So little hope that I won’t be doing something critical, like file transfers. Right now I’m moving 33GB off my C drive... not much reluctance, but disabling and re-enabling them when needed gives me better control over the update process. In XP I used to get updates at 1 AM—I can’t remember the exact settings, but I’m sure they were fully turned off.
E
ElGuerrero064
02-16-2016, 09:08 AM #4

By nature malware interferes with your system without consent, isn't it? Windows 10 is now recognized as malware officially. This morning I was engaging in some activities, including playing a windowed game, when the Nvidia drivers failed and I had to restart. After rebooting, I noticed Windows was attempting an update during startup, which seemed illogical. Just a short while ago I captured this image: Thank you Microsoft for intentionally ignoring my settings and trapping me in this situation with no way out.

Once more facing this, I’m turning to Linux. It’s easier for gaming here, doesn’t it? I had intended to upgrade to creators but needed time and personal availability. Now I’m just using a VM for games, which seems to work better... strange. I planned to enable updates for creators, but required preparation and free time I wouldn’t otherwise have. So little hope that I won’t be doing something critical, like file transfers. Right now I’m moving 33GB off my C drive... not much reluctance, but disabling and re-enabling them when needed gives me better control over the update process. In XP I used to get updates at 1 AM—I can’t remember the exact settings, but I’m sure they were fully turned off.

G
Guntherberry
Junior Member
5
02-16-2016, 11:42 AM
#5
The updates are pushed by Microsoft due to users who believe it's acceptable to update at any time or simply receive updates without interruption.
G
Guntherberry
02-16-2016, 11:42 AM #5

The updates are pushed by Microsoft due to users who believe it's acceptable to update at any time or simply receive updates without interruption.

N
Nienke_2002
Senior Member
621
02-22-2016, 12:21 PM
#6
Alright, I get why I’d try to handle it myself. I’ve saved it for later in case I forget. Everyone who turns it off has different motives, and I don’t think Microsh!t has the right to override my choice. Picture 20 machines shutting down at work because of this? If each person here earns just a minimum wage starting next January, that’s $15 an hour plus other costs—about 30% more. That’s hours of wasted time. Still, I keep rebooting for over three hours and not getting everything updated. It’s a lot of downtime for nothing. Why would Microsoft think they’re in charge? I wonder how many people get frustrated every day because of it… Seriously, I can’t tolerate any more interruptions. For one, I’m already mining so I don’t want wasted power use, and I don’t want annoying pop-ups while I’m working.
N
Nienke_2002
02-22-2016, 12:21 PM #6

Alright, I get why I’d try to handle it myself. I’ve saved it for later in case I forget. Everyone who turns it off has different motives, and I don’t think Microsh!t has the right to override my choice. Picture 20 machines shutting down at work because of this? If each person here earns just a minimum wage starting next January, that’s $15 an hour plus other costs—about 30% more. That’s hours of wasted time. Still, I keep rebooting for over three hours and not getting everything updated. It’s a lot of downtime for nothing. Why would Microsoft think they’re in charge? I wonder how many people get frustrated every day because of it… Seriously, I can’t tolerate any more interruptions. For one, I’m already mining so I don’t want wasted power use, and I don’t want annoying pop-ups while I’m working.

S
sixpar
Member
137
02-23-2016, 03:58 AM
#7
Initially, yes they possess the authority to override your choice; they control the software rather than you. You're paying for access, not ownership. Your agreement included their terms and conditions upon installation. Second, the most reliable method to keep Windows secure without automatic updates is disconnecting it from the internet. Simply because you know how to disable updates doesn't guarantee full awareness of all security risks (hence updates should always remain enabled). Third, an action center alert appears, letting you pick a convenient time for updates instead of forcing them during busy hours. Additionally, settings let you define specific intervals to prevent restarts. If you struggle with security or system adjustments, consider exploring alternative operating systems.
S
sixpar
02-23-2016, 03:58 AM #7

Initially, yes they possess the authority to override your choice; they control the software rather than you. You're paying for access, not ownership. Your agreement included their terms and conditions upon installation. Second, the most reliable method to keep Windows secure without automatic updates is disconnecting it from the internet. Simply because you know how to disable updates doesn't guarantee full awareness of all security risks (hence updates should always remain enabled). Third, an action center alert appears, letting you pick a convenient time for updates instead of forcing them during busy hours. Additionally, settings let you define specific intervals to prevent restarts. If you struggle with security or system adjustments, consider exploring alternative operating systems.

D
DeathbyFrog
Junior Member
35
02-23-2016, 09:32 PM
#8
They don't control my data on their system, as they locked me out. The agreements they have can keep personal info even without permission, making it feel like your data is being trapped. I had no choice—only one option existed, and if I could, I wouldn’t be so upset. If they used my phone info as leverage until I agreed, what would you say to them? That’s exactly what Microsoft did to me, and others too. They might have tried to restart with a different OS or rebooted Windows, but that wasn’t the main point. The update window now restricts just one screen and offers a hide option, unlike before. Whether this is correct about updates being secure or about them being automatic isn’t clear. Updates only activate when problems appear, which could last months or years. So, automatic updates aren’t really helpful with a closed-source OS; open source works better unless it’s a big change that needs rebooting. I get the security concerns, but the main worry is the Intel issue I still face. The last update I wanted was from XP, which caused problems—maybe they didn’t know how to fix it. Right now, the update process only locks one screen and has a hidden setting, unlike what I remember. It’s fair that updates are meant for viruses and bugs, not daily issues. Still, I don’t trust auto-updates much, especially on a system I don’t fully understand. The biggest concern is the Intel problem, but it needs more insight into my PC to fix. The XP update scare was real, but now it seems like a bigger deal than it should be.
D
DeathbyFrog
02-23-2016, 09:32 PM #8

They don't control my data on their system, as they locked me out. The agreements they have can keep personal info even without permission, making it feel like your data is being trapped. I had no choice—only one option existed, and if I could, I wouldn’t be so upset. If they used my phone info as leverage until I agreed, what would you say to them? That’s exactly what Microsoft did to me, and others too. They might have tried to restart with a different OS or rebooted Windows, but that wasn’t the main point. The update window now restricts just one screen and offers a hide option, unlike before. Whether this is correct about updates being secure or about them being automatic isn’t clear. Updates only activate when problems appear, which could last months or years. So, automatic updates aren’t really helpful with a closed-source OS; open source works better unless it’s a big change that needs rebooting. I get the security concerns, but the main worry is the Intel issue I still face. The last update I wanted was from XP, which caused problems—maybe they didn’t know how to fix it. Right now, the update process only locks one screen and has a hidden setting, unlike what I remember. It’s fair that updates are meant for viruses and bugs, not daily issues. Still, I don’t trust auto-updates much, especially on a system I don’t fully understand. The biggest concern is the Intel problem, but it needs more insight into my PC to fix. The XP update scare was real, but now it seems like a bigger deal than it should be.

C
ComboHax
Member
184
02-25-2016, 09:04 PM
#9
As anticipated, you likely haven’t grasped all the different methods hackers use to breach systems. After all, this isn’t my personal machine, so unless security isn’t important to you, I probably won’t be able to make you see it clearly.
C
ComboHax
02-25-2016, 09:04 PM #9

As anticipated, you likely haven’t grasped all the different methods hackers use to breach systems. After all, this isn’t my personal machine, so unless security isn’t important to you, I probably won’t be able to make you see it clearly.

N
NiamhyPoo
Junior Member
19
02-26-2016, 05:22 PM
#10
I've encountered viruses appearing in images, emails, and other formats. I'm aware of many ways computers can be compromised—some intentionally through webcode (like CPU mining) or others maliciously inserted. This is 2017, not 2001; nothing is flawless, but most problems stem from viruses or human error. Most sites I visit rarely encounter such threats, including here and on Google. The biggest concerns are the unknowns—issues that persist despite updates, as well as dormant viruses still present on devices.

Speaking of the last virus I experienced over eight years ago on XP, it happened because I chose to update reluctantly and landed on a compromised site. Even with a fully updated system, you remain vulnerable if you're prone to viruses. If Microsoft claims to protect your computer remotely, you're being naive.

Every little security patch helps, but these updates often get ignored. They’re likely caught by developers before they spread. Still, disabling them and then reactivating them could trigger consequences—like banning the source IPs.
N
NiamhyPoo
02-26-2016, 05:22 PM #10

I've encountered viruses appearing in images, emails, and other formats. I'm aware of many ways computers can be compromised—some intentionally through webcode (like CPU mining) or others maliciously inserted. This is 2017, not 2001; nothing is flawless, but most problems stem from viruses or human error. Most sites I visit rarely encounter such threats, including here and on Google. The biggest concerns are the unknowns—issues that persist despite updates, as well as dormant viruses still present on devices.

Speaking of the last virus I experienced over eight years ago on XP, it happened because I chose to update reluctantly and landed on a compromised site. Even with a fully updated system, you remain vulnerable if you're prone to viruses. If Microsoft claims to protect your computer remotely, you're being naive.

Every little security patch helps, but these updates often get ignored. They’re likely caught by developers before they spread. Still, disabling them and then reactivating them could trigger consequences—like banning the source IPs.