F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Trying to decide which motherboard fits your 6900XT and 5950X, feeling a bit stuck lately

Trying to decide which motherboard fits your 6900XT and 5950X, feeling a bit stuck lately

Trying to decide which motherboard fits your 6900XT and 5950X, feeling a bit stuck lately

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
N
NinatoPvP
Posting Freak
899
07-27-2016, 09:58 AM
#1
I recently decided to revisit the upgrade process after a prolonged break from X99, which was brand new when it first arrived, and also after getting the 5th generation CPU, mainly because I relied on it for gaming and heavy rendering tasks like 3D modeling, CAD, and music rendering. Now I’m back into workstation builds, so I managed to purchase a 6900XT and am wondering what motherboard would pair well with the Ryzen 5950X. I’m still not entirely sure where to begin, especially since there’s mixed information about ECC support and chipset compatibility. I’d prefer ECC for rendering purposes, which many of you can relate to, so the confusion when getting back into tech might be clear. This time I’m going with AMD, and I tried searching for guidance but it didn’t simplify things much. I checked out ASUS ROG Crosshair boards, but they seemed a bit overkill; the rear Wi-Fi ports were decent, though I’m open to a PCIe Wi-Fi card if available. They’re a bit pricey for what they offered. In short: which chipset should I focus on? B550 or X570? Which motherboard? Does it support ECC? What RAM speed should I choose? Likely 64GB, possibly also used for Star Citizen (though that’s not a priority), but rendering benefits from 32GB or more. It’s probably better to go with ECC if you need it, or stick with non-ECC RAM. A Noctua NH-D15 Any would be ideal, and any advice would be greatly appreciated.
N
NinatoPvP
07-27-2016, 09:58 AM #1

I recently decided to revisit the upgrade process after a prolonged break from X99, which was brand new when it first arrived, and also after getting the 5th generation CPU, mainly because I relied on it for gaming and heavy rendering tasks like 3D modeling, CAD, and music rendering. Now I’m back into workstation builds, so I managed to purchase a 6900XT and am wondering what motherboard would pair well with the Ryzen 5950X. I’m still not entirely sure where to begin, especially since there’s mixed information about ECC support and chipset compatibility. I’d prefer ECC for rendering purposes, which many of you can relate to, so the confusion when getting back into tech might be clear. This time I’m going with AMD, and I tried searching for guidance but it didn’t simplify things much. I checked out ASUS ROG Crosshair boards, but they seemed a bit overkill; the rear Wi-Fi ports were decent, though I’m open to a PCIe Wi-Fi card if available. They’re a bit pricey for what they offered. In short: which chipset should I focus on? B550 or X570? Which motherboard? Does it support ECC? What RAM speed should I choose? Likely 64GB, possibly also used for Star Citizen (though that’s not a priority), but rendering benefits from 32GB or more. It’s probably better to go with ECC if you need it, or stick with non-ECC RAM. A Noctua NH-D15 Any would be ideal, and any advice would be greatly appreciated.

G
Gfiti
Member
103
07-27-2016, 09:58 AM
#2
Consider a 5950x setup instead. I don’t think the extra cost for a 700+ CPU is worth missing out on key features. Better go with a 3200 MHz build—64 GB at 3600 MHz should work fine and function without heavy tweaking.
G
Gfiti
07-27-2016, 09:58 AM #2

Consider a 5950x setup instead. I don’t think the extra cost for a 700+ CPU is worth missing out on key features. Better go with a 3200 MHz build—64 GB at 3600 MHz should work fine and function without heavy tweaking.

B
Bacan01
Junior Member
9
07-27-2016, 09:58 AM
#3
I considered a 3200 kit of 64 bits. It tends to be a reliable choice, but I'm still deciding between ECC protection or just accepting potential faults as the final count. It might be simpler to start without worrying about fault rates, since finding good ECC options early can be tougher. Also, it could save time since you're less concerned about the number of individual failures.
B
Bacan01
07-27-2016, 09:58 AM #3

I considered a 3200 kit of 64 bits. It tends to be a reliable choice, but I'm still deciding between ECC protection or just accepting potential faults as the final count. It might be simpler to start without worrying about fault rates, since finding good ECC options early can be tougher. Also, it could save time since you're less concerned about the number of individual failures.

N
Necron65
Member
205
07-27-2016, 09:58 AM
#4
Alternatively, if adjustments and boosting are important, the x570 handles bclk overclocking while the b550 mainly supports Gen 3 PCIe and offers USB 3.2 ports. The x570 also supports SLC and crossfire, plus more USB 3.2 connections. Both chipsets can work well with quality boards, but for in-depth analysis you might want to explore overclocking on YouTube.
N
Necron65
07-27-2016, 09:58 AM #4

Alternatively, if adjustments and boosting are important, the x570 handles bclk overclocking while the b550 mainly supports Gen 3 PCIe and offers USB 3.2 ports. The x570 also supports SLC and crossfire, plus more USB 3.2 connections. Both chipsets can work well with quality boards, but for in-depth analysis you might want to explore overclocking on YouTube.

R
ryan_chu
Junior Member
4
07-27-2016, 09:58 AM
#5
I adjusted the overclock and fine-tuned the ratio until it matched my goals. However, I’m uncertain whether I’d stick with this new configuration—my confidence is wavering. In my earlier setup, I could rely on familiar Intel behavior and know which settings worked best. With AMD, I’m still learning how it handles clocking and performance.
R
ryan_chu
07-27-2016, 09:58 AM #5

I adjusted the overclock and fine-tuned the ratio until it matched my goals. However, I’m uncertain whether I’d stick with this new configuration—my confidence is wavering. In my earlier setup, I could rely on familiar Intel behavior and know which settings worked best. With AMD, I’m still learning how it handles clocking and performance.

W
Wilson1
Member
178
07-27-2016, 09:58 AM
#6
It may not need a 6% boost from ratio-clocking to achieve stable clocks without increasing heat when using an NH-D15 without BCLK-tuning.
W
Wilson1
07-27-2016, 09:58 AM #6

It may not need a 6% boost from ratio-clocking to achieve stable clocks without increasing heat when using an NH-D15 without BCLK-tuning.

X
xFunnyman
Member
192
07-27-2016, 09:58 AM
#7
x570 dark hero stands out as the top pick among options. The 4x16 chip is relatively affordable, and you won’t find BCLK on this model. It also supports per-core tuning and will run on a D15 socket.
X
xFunnyman
07-27-2016, 09:58 AM #7

x570 dark hero stands out as the top pick among options. The 4x16 chip is relatively affordable, and you won’t find BCLK on this model. It also supports per-core tuning and will run on a D15 socket.

H
Hexody
Member
57
07-27-2016, 09:58 AM
#8
The dark hero comes with a high cost, making it one of the most expensive options. After reviewing it, I’m starting to wonder if the price is justified—maybe it’s worth it. There’s some doubt about whether it’s too extreme or essential. Should I tune it based on core voltage or ratio?
H
Hexody
07-27-2016, 09:58 AM #8

The dark hero comes with a high cost, making it one of the most expensive options. After reviewing it, I’m starting to wonder if the price is justified—maybe it’s worth it. There’s some doubt about whether it’s too extreme or essential. Should I tune it based on core voltage or ratio?

B
BHLxNJx
Posting Freak
881
07-27-2016, 09:58 AM
#9
tbh it doesn't really matter too much, tops around 100mhz. i've seen some videos on youtube showing specs like 5.0 2 core, 4.9 4 core, 4.8 8 core and 4.6 16-core. i'm trying to keep it around 4.7/4.5 for a smoother experience, pbo the curve optimizer on other boards does a good job with ocs already, though it's not as exciting. it offers better ram oc per buildzoid, the fan (x570S uses less power), and the vrms are way too powerful (even compared to taichi and master, i'm not even considering the vrms). apparently taichi had a few minor issues since launch, and this board is already a 300dollar model. master has some problems, and the old hero isn't worth it anymore—just 50 dollars cheaper than the dark hero. it covers everything for me.
B
BHLxNJx
07-27-2016, 09:58 AM #9

tbh it doesn't really matter too much, tops around 100mhz. i've seen some videos on youtube showing specs like 5.0 2 core, 4.9 4 core, 4.8 8 core and 4.6 16-core. i'm trying to keep it around 4.7/4.5 for a smoother experience, pbo the curve optimizer on other boards does a good job with ocs already, though it's not as exciting. it offers better ram oc per buildzoid, the fan (x570S uses less power), and the vrms are way too powerful (even compared to taichi and master, i'm not even considering the vrms). apparently taichi had a few minor issues since launch, and this board is already a 300dollar model. master has some problems, and the old hero isn't worth it anymore—just 50 dollars cheaper than the dark hero. it covers everything for me.

E
Envil_
Member
126
07-27-2016, 09:58 AM
#10
Auto-tuning works well and it gives you flexibility to start with and then fine-tune later, which is always a plus. The "no chipset fan" feature stands out compared to most X570 models, making it immediately appealing. The blue-purple lighting is also a nice touch. I’m impressed by the design, though I wouldn’t expect it in a completely silent case. So far, I’m considering kits with 32GB and 3200MHZ, aiming for something under CL 16-20-20 since those Kingston Fury options seem out of stock or too costly.
E
Envil_
07-27-2016, 09:58 AM #10

Auto-tuning works well and it gives you flexibility to start with and then fine-tune later, which is always a plus. The "no chipset fan" feature stands out compared to most X570 models, making it immediately appealing. The blue-purple lighting is also a nice touch. I’m impressed by the design, though I wouldn’t expect it in a completely silent case. So far, I’m considering kits with 32GB and 3200MHZ, aiming for something under CL 16-20-20 since those Kingston Fury options seem out of stock or too costly.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next