TP-Link EAP 225 access points suitable for big homes
TP-Link EAP 225 access points suitable for big homes
Hi, I'm checking if it's possible to set up wifi throughout your 4-story home using TP-link EAP 225 access points. The main floor covers 2500 sq ft and already has some ethernet wiring. You're thinking about placing these access points on each floor so everyone gets consistent coverage. Each point will connect via Ethernet to a shared network, and you want identical SSID and password across all devices. You're curious if this setup allows smooth movement and automatic switching between the best signal, ensuring uninterrupted internet. Also, can multiple TP-link EAP 225 units replace Ubiquiti gear?
@HelloIN The EAP 225 functions as an Omada device and should integrate well with TP-Link’s SDN setup. For those unfamiliar with these wireless technologies, it enables the use of one SSID, facilitating smooth transitions between networks for mobile devices. Check out the review video for more details.
You're welcome for your reply. I have ethernet cables set up in various spots around the house. Can I use EAP235-Wall V1 Omada AC1200 or EAP230-Wall V1 Omada AC1200 wireless MU-MIMO Gigabit wall plates? They appear to be compatible with Omada as per the list you shared. Should I be able to switch smoothly between them and maintain a continuous internet connection? Also, will my phone or laptop automatically connect to the strongest available access point? Thanks.
Technically, yes. However, consider the purpose these in-wall APs serve. For each of these devices, whether ceiling or wall-mounted, you’ll require a PoE switch with sufficient power to support all of them. To achieve the wireless reach from in-wall APs, you’ll need more units than those mounted on ceilings. Moreover, in-wall APs rely solely on PoE power, while others may draw from AC mains (I haven’t verified your models). Secondly, although I don’t see TP-Link’s specs on their in-wall AP radiation patterns, they’re marketed for hotel/dorm settings. This limits their coverage to the space where they’re installed. My assumption is that their pattern isn’t fully omnidirectional like ceiling mounts because much of the signal would be absorbed by walls. Also, since they’re often placed near the floor, the strength might be slightly lower than when mounted higher. In a home setting, they work well for filling gaps where omnidirectional APs fall short or where you need both wired and wireless options. As mentioned in my earlier post, this concept is referred to as seamless roaming.