F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Networks TP-LINK Archer AX11000 with USB-C performance Need fast speeds? This device delivers quick connectivity.

TP-LINK Archer AX11000 with USB-C performance Need fast speeds? This device delivers quick connectivity.

TP-LINK Archer AX11000 with USB-C performance Need fast speeds? This device delivers quick connectivity.

H
Hencorp
Member
122
01-15-2016, 07:32 AM
#1
USB-C performance | TP-LINK Archer AX11000
Hello everyone, I'm checking the USB-C read/write capability of the new TP-LINK Archer AX11000. With only a 1.8 GHz quad-core CPU, three coprocessors, and 1 GB RAM, I'm currently using a Netgear R7000 and a 2 TB SanDisk Extreme SSD that supports up to 550 MB/s read. As a NAS/home media server, this is ideal. My existing router only supports USB 3.0, which limits me to about 50 Mbps read and 30 Mbps write. I'm considering upgrading to this router since its C port could deliver 550 Mbps speeds. For two users needing it as a local file server and for gaming, what are the actual USB-C speeds on this model? Thanks in advance.
H
Hencorp
01-15-2016, 07:32 AM #1

USB-C performance | TP-LINK Archer AX11000
Hello everyone, I'm checking the USB-C read/write capability of the new TP-LINK Archer AX11000. With only a 1.8 GHz quad-core CPU, three coprocessors, and 1 GB RAM, I'm currently using a Netgear R7000 and a 2 TB SanDisk Extreme SSD that supports up to 550 MB/s read. As a NAS/home media server, this is ideal. My existing router only supports USB 3.0, which limits me to about 50 Mbps read and 30 Mbps write. I'm considering upgrading to this router since its C port could deliver 550 Mbps speeds. For two users needing it as a local file server and for gaming, what are the actual USB-C speeds on this model? Thanks in advance.

D
Darkness14
Junior Member
3
01-15-2016, 08:09 AM
#2
USB 3.0 supports up to 5Gbps, but the slowdown usually comes from your network, not your adapter. Are you connected via Wi-Fi?
D
Darkness14
01-15-2016, 08:09 AM #2

USB 3.0 supports up to 5Gbps, but the slowdown usually comes from your network, not your adapter. Are you connected via Wi-Fi?

M
markopolo1996
Member
58
01-20-2016, 11:14 AM
#3
You're using your desktop's Ethernet port and your current router (R7000) isn't handling speeds beyond 30MBps write or 50MBps read. You think upgrading might be necessary. You suspect the issue isn't with your Sandisk SSD, but rather with the router itself, which is an older model bought in 2016.
M
markopolo1996
01-20-2016, 11:14 AM #3

You're using your desktop's Ethernet port and your current router (R7000) isn't handling speeds beyond 30MBps write or 50MBps read. You think upgrading might be necessary. You suspect the issue isn't with your Sandisk SSD, but rather with the router itself, which is an older model bought in 2016.

E
EnderSponge_
Member
225
01-23-2016, 01:01 PM
#4
Even though routers provide this capability, they seldom serve as reliable file servers. Opt for a dedicated NAS instead.
E
EnderSponge_
01-23-2016, 01:01 PM #4

Even though routers provide this capability, they seldom serve as reliable file servers. Opt for a dedicated NAS instead.

S
Squidney916
Member
60
01-23-2016, 07:52 PM
#5
S
Squidney916
01-23-2016, 07:52 PM #5

C
147
01-24-2016, 04:21 AM
#6
Only need to search online to find how a NAS performs with your wireless routers. The figures you see for the R7000 match results from actual tests. This reviewer achieved 104/54Mbps during the AX11000's NAS evaluations, though it isn't the most powerful option out there. As suggested earlier, if you can spare the cost and a high-performance NAS is crucial, opt for a dedicated system like a Synology 2-bay setup. These devices have optimized CPUs and chipsets for this use case. Conversely, a router's CPU may look efficient in theory, but it still handles network traffic, routing, WiFi clients, etc., which could affect its speed with NAS tasks.
C
CadentAlphadog
01-24-2016, 04:21 AM #6

Only need to search online to find how a NAS performs with your wireless routers. The figures you see for the R7000 match results from actual tests. This reviewer achieved 104/54Mbps during the AX11000's NAS evaluations, though it isn't the most powerful option out there. As suggested earlier, if you can spare the cost and a high-performance NAS is crucial, opt for a dedicated system like a Synology 2-bay setup. These devices have optimized CPUs and chipsets for this use case. Conversely, a router's CPU may look efficient in theory, but it still handles network traffic, routing, WiFi clients, etc., which could affect its speed with NAS tasks.

N
ninjaman81
Member
53
01-24-2016, 09:37 AM
#7
The main "gaming" aspect of a router is just promotional hype. If you want a solid NAS, stick with your existing router and invest the funds elsewhere.
N
ninjaman81
01-24-2016, 09:37 AM #7

The main "gaming" aspect of a router is just promotional hype. If you want a solid NAS, stick with your existing router and invest the funds elsewhere.

S
staubfinga
Junior Member
8
01-24-2016, 10:23 AM
#8
The picture shows multiple routers connected to storage devices, with their data transfer rates displayed.
S
staubfinga
01-24-2016, 10:23 AM #8

The picture shows multiple routers connected to storage devices, with their data transfer rates displayed.

_
_fap_sap_
Junior Member
3
02-01-2016, 05:46 AM
#9
Most routers perform poorly for NAS use because they require a lot of processing power, even on a standard computer.
_
_fap_sap_
02-01-2016, 05:46 AM #9

Most routers perform poorly for NAS use because they require a lot of processing power, even on a standard computer.