F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Networks Top-tier gaming router comparison: ASUS ROG GT-AX11000 versus NETGEAR NightHawk XR700

Top-tier gaming router comparison: ASUS ROG GT-AX11000 versus NETGEAR NightHawk XR700

Top-tier gaming router comparison: ASUS ROG GT-AX11000 versus NETGEAR NightHawk XR700

A
AstroMC_
Junior Member
2
11-19-2023, 01:30 PM
#1
I’m evaluating the two top gaming routers for my setup. My home is in New Zealand with a size of about 500-600 m² and three people. I need minimal latency for smooth gaming. The ASUS ROG GT-AX11000 offers features to prioritize gaming traffic, which is important for avoiding packet loss. Since I frequently download large files—around 80Gbps—I want reliable speeds. The NETGEAR NightHawk XR700 includes a 60Hz channel and doesn’t worry about security concerns. Considering these factors, which one better fits my requirements? Thanks in advance!
A
AstroMC_
11-19-2023, 01:30 PM #1

I’m evaluating the two top gaming routers for my setup. My home is in New Zealand with a size of about 500-600 m² and three people. I need minimal latency for smooth gaming. The ASUS ROG GT-AX11000 offers features to prioritize gaming traffic, which is important for avoiding packet loss. Since I frequently download large files—around 80Gbps—I want reliable speeds. The NETGEAR NightHawk XR700 includes a 60Hz channel and doesn’t worry about security concerns. Considering these factors, which one better fits my requirements? Thanks in advance!

T
Tarasgames
Member
52
11-20-2023, 10:53 PM
#2
Main concern: Will the PC connect via Ethernet or rely on Wi-Fi? Using an Ethernet cable should reduce latency more effectively than any high-end Wi-Fi router can achieve over the air. Also, consider that device support for 802.11AX is minimal (or nearly absent). These gaming routers can be configured to prioritize traffic, but typically only with a well-marketed QoS setup. The number of walls and materials significantly affects WiFi coverage. Security should remain a priority.
T
Tarasgames
11-20-2023, 10:53 PM #2

Main concern: Will the PC connect via Ethernet or rely on Wi-Fi? Using an Ethernet cable should reduce latency more effectively than any high-end Wi-Fi router can achieve over the air. Also, consider that device support for 802.11AX is minimal (or nearly absent). These gaming routers can be configured to prioritize traffic, but typically only with a well-marketed QoS setup. The number of walls and materials significantly affects WiFi coverage. Security should remain a priority.

C
Caribbean_Blue
Senior Member
609
11-24-2023, 12:49 AM
#3
These devices typically use 802.11ax for better performance, while 802.11ad is more common in older or specialized setups.
C
Caribbean_Blue
11-24-2023, 12:49 AM #3

These devices typically use 802.11ax for better performance, while 802.11ad is more common in older or specialized setups.

W
winnerplay25
Senior Member
477
12-05-2023, 11:56 AM
#4
I'm aware of laptops that work with AD, but I wouldn't go that route due to its limited range and sensitivity to interference. Check out Linus's video for more details: regarding Wireless AX, there are routers/APs available, though it seems the standard hasn't been officially approved by IEEE yet. Given how recent the standard is, it's unlikely any devices currently have AX Wireless chipsets (perhaps next year).
W
winnerplay25
12-05-2023, 11:56 AM #4

I'm aware of laptops that work with AD, but I wouldn't go that route due to its limited range and sensitivity to interference. Check out Linus's video for more details: regarding Wireless AX, there are routers/APs available, though it seems the standard hasn't been officially approved by IEEE yet. Given how recent the standard is, it's unlikely any devices currently have AX Wireless chipsets (perhaps next year).

M
master_scope
Posting Freak
794
12-21-2023, 05:31 PM
#5
AD never gained traction since 60 Ghz simply lacks penetration capabilities and remains a single-room fix. AX is brand new, and it won’t be until months or years that we see widespread device support. You’ll be okay with an AC router as well. Remember that WiFi cards in phones, tablets, and even some laptops usually fall short of the AC standard. Most laptop cards I’ve seen cap at around 867 Mbps on 5GHz, while desktop cards can manage higher speeds.
M
master_scope
12-21-2023, 05:31 PM #5

AD never gained traction since 60 Ghz simply lacks penetration capabilities and remains a single-room fix. AX is brand new, and it won’t be until months or years that we see widespread device support. You’ll be okay with an AC router as well. Remember that WiFi cards in phones, tablets, and even some laptops usually fall short of the AC standard. Most laptop cards I’ve seen cap at around 867 Mbps on 5GHz, while desktop cards can manage higher speeds.