F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking Top choice for boosting AMD FX-8370 to 4.6GHz.

Top choice for boosting AMD FX-8370 to 4.6GHz.

Top choice for boosting AMD FX-8370 to 4.6GHz.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
R
208
05-08-2025, 12:47 PM
#1
I'm just getting started with overclocking. I'm aiming to push my FX-8370 to 4.6 GHz for better performance in CPU-heavy games. I'm considering the CM Hyper d92 or Corsair H60 cooling solutions, but I still need to explore more options. I'd like a stylish cooler instead of a bulky one. Also, could you let me know if my current setup can handle this overclock?
R
realfuzzpikchu
05-08-2025, 12:47 PM #1

I'm just getting started with overclocking. I'm aiming to push my FX-8370 to 4.6 GHz for better performance in CPU-heavy games. I'm considering the CM Hyper d92 or Corsair H60 cooling solutions, but I still need to explore more options. I'd like a stylish cooler instead of a bulky one. Also, could you let me know if my current setup can handle this overclock?

D
DIDIx13
Member
90
05-08-2025, 11:24 PM
#2
I managed to reach 4.7GHz on both my H60 and 212 EVO units with push-pull fans. However, you're looking at a $38 air cooler versus a $65 AIO model. The D92 with its 92mm fans might be sufficient. I haven't used one with such small fans before. Personally, if those were the only options, I'd choose the C60.
D
DIDIx13
05-08-2025, 11:24 PM #2

I managed to reach 4.7GHz on both my H60 and 212 EVO units with push-pull fans. However, you're looking at a $38 air cooler versus a $65 AIO model. The D92 with its 92mm fans might be sufficient. I haven't used one with such small fans before. Personally, if those were the only options, I'd choose the C60.

A
agarmor
Member
223
05-09-2025, 12:56 AM
#3
I managed to reach 4.7GHz on both my H60 and 212 EVO units with push-pull fans. However, you're looking at a $38 air cooler versus a $65 AIO model. The D92 with its 92mm fans might be sufficient. I haven't used one with such small fans before. Personally, if those were the only options, I'd choose the C60.
A
agarmor
05-09-2025, 12:56 AM #3

I managed to reach 4.7GHz on both my H60 and 212 EVO units with push-pull fans. However, you're looking at a $38 air cooler versus a $65 AIO model. The D92 with its 92mm fans might be sufficient. I haven't used one with such small fans before. Personally, if those were the only options, I'd choose the C60.

P
PaigeOfTheBook
Senior Member
733
05-09-2025, 03:32 AM
#4
I managed to reach 4.7GHz with both my H60 and my 212 EVO (push-pull fans). However, you're comparing a $38 air cooler to a $65 AIO cooler. The D92 with its push-pull 92mm fans might be sufficient. I haven't used one with such small fans before. Personally, if those were the only options, I'd choose the C60. Thanks for your reply. If those aren't the only choices, which cooler would you suggest? I like the H60 and its appearance, but I'm unsure about its longevity. I've heard Corsair offers a 5-year warranty on it. Most reviews were mixed, so I wasn't very confident before making a decision.
P
PaigeOfTheBook
05-09-2025, 03:32 AM #4

I managed to reach 4.7GHz with both my H60 and my 212 EVO (push-pull fans). However, you're comparing a $38 air cooler to a $65 AIO cooler. The D92 with its push-pull 92mm fans might be sufficient. I haven't used one with such small fans before. Personally, if those were the only options, I'd choose the C60. Thanks for your reply. If those aren't the only choices, which cooler would you suggest? I like the H60 and its appearance, but I'm unsure about its longevity. I've heard Corsair offers a 5-year warranty on it. Most reviews were mixed, so I wasn't very confident before making a decision.

T
TheSimple
Member
229
05-13-2025, 01:07 PM
#5
I managed to reach 4.7GHz with both my H60 and my 212 EVO (with push-pull fans). However, you're comparing a $38 air cooler to a $65 AIO cooler. The D92 with its 92mm fans might be sufficient. I haven't used one with such small fans before. Personally, if those were the only options, I'd choose the C60.

I also noticed your 212 EVO. Given that it can support my overclock, do you think the H60 provides better cooling or at least comparable performance to the 212 EVO?
T
TheSimple
05-13-2025, 01:07 PM #5

I managed to reach 4.7GHz with both my H60 and my 212 EVO (with push-pull fans). However, you're comparing a $38 air cooler to a $65 AIO cooler. The D92 with its 92mm fans might be sufficient. I haven't used one with such small fans before. Personally, if those were the only options, I'd choose the C60.

I also noticed your 212 EVO. Given that it can support my overclock, do you think the H60 provides better cooling or at least comparable performance to the 212 EVO?

R
RaiZer_
Member
203
05-13-2025, 03:46 PM
#6
I managed to reach 4.7GHz with both my H60 and 212 EVO units (with push-pull fans). However, you're looking at a $38 air cooler versus a $65 AIO cooler. The D92 with its 92mm fans might be sufficient. I haven't used one with such small fans before. Personally, if those were the only options, I'd choose the C60.

I also saw your 212 EVO. Given that it supports my overclock, do you think the H60 performs better or at least matches the 212 EVO?

I've owned both the C60 and 212 EVO. Out of the box they seem quite similar in performance, with the C60 slightly ahead until you add a second fan to the 212 EVO. But the C60 looks more appealing and is simpler to install.

I haven't encountered any problems with either model I've had. I still have one of each in use without issues. A friend built a PC with it and has been running it nonstop for years, even past the time I owned it.
R
RaiZer_
05-13-2025, 03:46 PM #6

I managed to reach 4.7GHz with both my H60 and 212 EVO units (with push-pull fans). However, you're looking at a $38 air cooler versus a $65 AIO cooler. The D92 with its 92mm fans might be sufficient. I haven't used one with such small fans before. Personally, if those were the only options, I'd choose the C60.

I also saw your 212 EVO. Given that it supports my overclock, do you think the H60 performs better or at least matches the 212 EVO?

I've owned both the C60 and 212 EVO. Out of the box they seem quite similar in performance, with the C60 slightly ahead until you add a second fan to the 212 EVO. But the C60 looks more appealing and is simpler to install.

I haven't encountered any problems with either model I've had. I still have one of each in use without issues. A friend built a PC with it and has been running it nonstop for years, even past the time I owned it.

I
idobd
Junior Member
32
05-13-2025, 11:08 PM
#7
The motherboard struggles to handle 125w CPUs at their default settings because of its limited VRM design, making overclocking without throttling highly improbable.
I
idobd
05-13-2025, 11:08 PM #7

The motherboard struggles to handle 125w CPUs at their default settings because of its limited VRM design, making overclocking without throttling highly improbable.

J
Joaozinh
Member
124
05-14-2025, 12:24 AM
#8
It's really hard to maintain stability with the CPU at normal speeds. This board has weak thermal and power configuration, and VRM throttling often occurs here. Choosing a cooler that doesn't blow air across the VRMs wouldn't be wise.
J
Joaozinh
05-14-2025, 12:24 AM #8

It's really hard to maintain stability with the CPU at normal speeds. This board has weak thermal and power configuration, and VRM throttling often occurs here. Choosing a cooler that doesn't blow air across the VRMs wouldn't be wise.

B
B0stan
Junior Member
12
05-14-2025, 06:12 PM
#9
I managed to reach 4.7GHz with both my H60 and my 212 EVO (with push-pull fans). However, you're comparing a $38 air cooler to a $65 AIO cooler. The D92 with its 92mm fans might be sufficient. I haven't used one with such small fans before. Personally, if those were the only options, I'd choose the C60.

I also noticed your 212 EVO. Since I can confirm it supports my overclock, do you think the H60 cools better or at least as well as the 212 EVO?

I've had both the C60 and the 212 EVO in stock; they perform similarly from my experience, with the C60 slightly better until you add a second fan to the 212 EVO. But the C60 looks better and is easier to install.

I've never encountered any problems with either of the C60s I've used. I still have one of each in operation without issues. A relative of mine built a PC using it and has been running it nonstop for several years now.

Thank you. My final question before closing this thread is, do you know if your motherboard can handle such an overclock?
B
B0stan
05-14-2025, 06:12 PM #9

I managed to reach 4.7GHz with both my H60 and my 212 EVO (with push-pull fans). However, you're comparing a $38 air cooler to a $65 AIO cooler. The D92 with its 92mm fans might be sufficient. I haven't used one with such small fans before. Personally, if those were the only options, I'd choose the C60.

I also noticed your 212 EVO. Since I can confirm it supports my overclock, do you think the H60 cools better or at least as well as the 212 EVO?

I've had both the C60 and the 212 EVO in stock; they perform similarly from my experience, with the C60 slightly better until you add a second fan to the 212 EVO. But the C60 looks better and is easier to install.

I've never encountered any problems with either of the C60s I've used. I still have one of each in operation without issues. A relative of mine built a PC using it and has been running it nonstop for several years now.

Thank you. My final question before closing this thread is, do you know if your motherboard can handle such an overclock?

R
raider112233
Member
168
05-14-2025, 07:40 PM
#10
Hassan83:
Thank you for your response. Before finalizing this thread, could you confirm if your motherboard is capable of handling such an overclock? As mentioned earlier, it isn't built for overclocking, so the performance will be subpar and the device might not last long. However, I've done overclocking on other boards with similar issues. You should proceed at your own risk, as we always do when working with overclocking.
R
raider112233
05-14-2025, 07:40 PM #10

Hassan83:
Thank you for your response. Before finalizing this thread, could you confirm if your motherboard is capable of handling such an overclock? As mentioned earlier, it isn't built for overclocking, so the performance will be subpar and the device might not last long. However, I've done overclocking on other boards with similar issues. You should proceed at your own risk, as we always do when working with overclocking.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next