F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking This Ryzen 7 2700x is experiencing unstable high clock speeds and elevated temperatures.

This Ryzen 7 2700x is experiencing unstable high clock speeds and elevated temperatures.

This Ryzen 7 2700x is experiencing unstable high clock speeds and elevated temperatures.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
B
Brudora
Senior Member
726
12-04-2018, 10:05 AM
#1
So I own a Ryzen 7 2700x with an all-core overclock at 4.3 ghz. Sometimes when heavy tasks run, the hardware monitor displays it reaching up to 4.78 ghz across all eight cores for about two seconds before returning to the set value. This frequent fluctuation causes instability since the voltage is locked at 4.3 ghz for stability rather than a higher 4.7 ghz. I’m considering increasing the voltage or enabling auto-voltage, but right now it’s hard to maintain under 80°C with the current settings. If I let the voltage rise to keep stability, overheating becomes likely. Should I upgrade my cooler or simply keep the core clock locked? I’m using an MSI X470 gaming M7 AC motherboard, and the cooler I have is probably not much better than the stock Wraith Prism model. When it shows 4.78 ghz across all cores, it means each core is indeed reporting that figure.
B
Brudora
12-04-2018, 10:05 AM #1

So I own a Ryzen 7 2700x with an all-core overclock at 4.3 ghz. Sometimes when heavy tasks run, the hardware monitor displays it reaching up to 4.78 ghz across all eight cores for about two seconds before returning to the set value. This frequent fluctuation causes instability since the voltage is locked at 4.3 ghz for stability rather than a higher 4.7 ghz. I’m considering increasing the voltage or enabling auto-voltage, but right now it’s hard to maintain under 80°C with the current settings. If I let the voltage rise to keep stability, overheating becomes likely. Should I upgrade my cooler or simply keep the core clock locked? I’m using an MSI X470 gaming M7 AC motherboard, and the cooler I have is probably not much better than the stock Wraith Prism model. When it shows 4.78 ghz across all cores, it means each core is indeed reporting that figure.

J
Joepie0914
Member
63
12-05-2018, 09:42 PM
#2
Or that. I would certainly enter the BIOS and turn off any kind of boost or PBO/XFR settings.
J
Joepie0914
12-05-2018, 09:42 PM #2

Or that. I would certainly enter the BIOS and turn off any kind of boost or PBO/XFR settings.

L
LicorneRPZ
Junior Member
41
12-05-2018, 11:42 PM
#3
Did you disable the TURBO setting in BIOS during the overclocking process? When you adjust your CPU cores to run at specific speeds, you usually need to turn off TURBO in BIOS, which is typically enabled by default for every standard CPU you purchase. It seems your CPU might be attempting to boost when it perceives 4.3 GHz isn't sufficient for certain demanding applications, and since the stock frequency is now used instead of the TURBO speed, it triggers a boost that pushes you up to around 4.7 GHz. I have been overclocking my CPU for years without reaching the frequencies I intended, so this is just my hypothesis.
L
LicorneRPZ
12-05-2018, 11:42 PM #3

Did you disable the TURBO setting in BIOS during the overclocking process? When you adjust your CPU cores to run at specific speeds, you usually need to turn off TURBO in BIOS, which is typically enabled by default for every standard CPU you purchase. It seems your CPU might be attempting to boost when it perceives 4.3 GHz isn't sufficient for certain demanding applications, and since the stock frequency is now used instead of the TURBO speed, it triggers a boost that pushes you up to around 4.7 GHz. I have been overclocking my CPU for years without reaching the frequencies I intended, so this is just my hypothesis.

R
Redstoner137
Posting Freak
811
12-06-2018, 03:50 AM
#4
This might be a glitch; your CPU isn't reaching 4.8 GHz. Many users face problems with the HW monitor. Try running hwinfo64 and selecting "sensors only."
R
Redstoner137
12-06-2018, 03:50 AM #4

This might be a glitch; your CPU isn't reaching 4.8 GHz. Many users face problems with the HW monitor. Try running hwinfo64 and selecting "sensors only."

M
mat_fram
Posting Freak
776
12-13-2018, 10:19 PM
#5
it might be the xfr2 since it thinks you can increase the clock speed, though the voltage is fixed so it won't stay stable until I get a better cooler. i'll have to turn it off (xfr2 is basically a turbo but does much more than regular turbo boost).
M
mat_fram
12-13-2018, 10:19 PM #5

it might be the xfr2 since it thinks you can increase the clock speed, though the voltage is fixed so it won't stay stable until I get a better cooler. i'll have to turn it off (xfr2 is basically a turbo but does much more than regular turbo boost).

S
Shaggy24
Member
64
12-15-2018, 04:26 AM
#6
And regarding the glitch, it isn't that I used the hardware monitor Ryzen Master command center CPUZ or checked the built-in performance section in Task Manager. I also notice it's unusual to be able to use XFR2 alongside my all-core overclock in the BIOS.
S
Shaggy24
12-15-2018, 04:26 AM #6

And regarding the glitch, it isn't that I used the hardware monitor Ryzen Master command center CPUZ or checked the built-in performance section in Task Manager. I also notice it's unusual to be able to use XFR2 alongside my all-core overclock in the BIOS.

W
Watermelon72
Junior Member
4
12-16-2018, 08:20 PM
#7
Are you sure your BIOS is current? Did you perform a fresh Windows installation when you first got the 2700X?
It's unlikely you're reaching 4.8 GHz. The highest recorded speed for an air-cooled 2700X is around 4.6 GHz.
https://hwbot.org/benchmark/cpu_fre...Id=processor_5695&cores=8#start=0#interval=20
W
Watermelon72
12-16-2018, 08:20 PM #7

Are you sure your BIOS is current? Did you perform a fresh Windows installation when you first got the 2700X?
It's unlikely you're reaching 4.8 GHz. The highest recorded speed for an air-cooled 2700X is around 4.6 GHz.
https://hwbot.org/benchmark/cpu_fre...Id=processor_5695&cores=8#start=0#interval=20

L
laserluci
Junior Member
35
12-17-2018, 02:28 AM
#8
it isn't maintaining a stable 4.8, it briefly drops for about 2 milliseconds before returning. This is probably because I didn't set a limit on my xfr2 profile, causing it to stay between 4.3 and 4.4 across all cores around 98% of the time during full load. It might jump to 4.7 when the system transitions under load.
L
laserluci
12-17-2018, 02:28 AM #8

it isn't maintaining a stable 4.8, it briefly drops for about 2 milliseconds before returning. This is probably because I didn't set a limit on my xfr2 profile, causing it to stay between 4.3 and 4.4 across all cores around 98% of the time during full load. It might jump to 4.7 when the system transitions under load.

B
BurryPetya
Member
69
12-23-2018, 09:09 PM
#9
and it doesn't always crash when the clocks go higher, but i've seen that whenever it does crash, it displays these clock speeds.
B
BurryPetya
12-23-2018, 09:09 PM #9

and it doesn't always crash when the clocks go higher, but i've seen that whenever it does crash, it displays these clock speeds.

R
Rinusvandijk
Member
141
12-23-2018, 11:16 PM
#10
Yes, every one of them indicates you're reaching 4.8ghz.
R
Rinusvandijk
12-23-2018, 11:16 PM #10

Yes, every one of them indicates you're reaching 4.8ghz.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next