This new Wi-Fi 6 router is limited to 200Mbits per second.
This new Wi-Fi 6 router is limited to 200Mbits per second.
It's made from a combination of materials, though the exact composition isn't specified.
The issue is clear. 5GHz offers weaker signal reach compared to 2.4GHz. Concrete already poses challenges for Wi-Fi connectivity.
@kosimiki The WiFi configuration? You should connect to the 5GHz network. Your data indicates you're still on the 2.4GHz frequency. No adjustments will fix the 2.4GHz issue in your home. I recommend changing the names of your SSIDs so you can distinguish between the 2.4GHz and 5GHz networks.
I forgot to include a chart, but I have both turned on. So, there’s really no point in using Wi-Fi 6. I managed to achieve comparable speeds with a cheap adapter and the included software, though it doesn’t support AC standards. Honestly, I expected slower performance, but this is disappointing...
WiFi 6 isn’t the problem. The main issue lies with 5 GHz limitations. TP Link isn’t considered top-tier; they’re more affordable choices. The choice of frequency bands, AP design, and home setup all affect performance. That’s why you should manage expectations if you rely on WiFi for critical tasks. This is why I prefer Ethernet for gaming, avoiding WiFi’s shortcomings. Remember, Wi-Fi standards are tested in controlled environments—real-world conditions differ significantly.
I understand both antenna settings are active, but the device you used for the survey operates on the 2.4GHz frequency, which is already very crowded and likely the main cause of your slow connection. Most dual-band routers can automatically direct users to a specific band depending on distance and performance, though this isn't always effective. To improve things, I recommend switching the SSID—such as using "isekai_2G" for 2.4GHz and "isekai_5G" for 5GHz—and then instructing clients to connect exclusively to the 5GHz band. On Windows systems, you can also adjust the wireless adapter to prioritize 5GHz, ensuring it favors the faster channel even if a 2.4GHz signal is present.
Unfortunately even with the 5G boost it doesn't improve much, probably because it only changes to 2.4GHz when traffic is low. I thought about buying an ASUS router for twice the price, but it felt too expensive. I might go back to my reliable Ethernet cable and use the cost of the router and adapter as a learning expense. Thanks!
Uncertain why no one suggests switching to another 5GHz band, the scanning tool actually recommends it. From my side, I know channel 36 can be unreliable since devices that don’t appear on scans often use it too. It’s frustrating because most others seem to be using DFS, but it’s definitely worth testing before giving up. In my experience, Windows tends to run slower on a 80MHz channel width than expected and only achieves good speeds with a 160MHz width. I’d strongly advise sticking with cable for now—it’s always the top choice—but exploring other channels should definitely be your next step. I’m also worried about your ISP providing a router without AC support; since any device older than that can’t handle Gigabit speeds, you might be stuck even with wired connections.