F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop This model costs just 3.2 dollars.

This model costs just 3.2 dollars.

This model costs just 3.2 dollars.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
L
Lovechurros
Member
197
05-25-2025, 10:59 AM
#1
The base clock runs at 3.2 GHz, which is lower than the 9.9 GHz you mentioned.
L
Lovechurros
05-25-2025, 10:59 AM #1

The base clock runs at 3.2 GHz, which is lower than the 9.9 GHz you mentioned.

B
61
06-14-2025, 06:36 PM
#2
It really doesn't matter. All CPUs tend to increase speed to near their maximum, and the 12900K has both P cores and E cores, so it's clear you're asking about the P cores.
B
beebopbunney23
06-14-2025, 06:36 PM #2

It really doesn't matter. All CPUs tend to increase speed to near their maximum, and the 12900K has both P cores and E cores, so it's clear you're asking about the P cores.

J
jpurdy123
Member
56
06-24-2025, 11:29 PM
#3
Yup.
J
jpurdy123
06-24-2025, 11:29 PM #3

Yup.

R
Raeltris
Junior Member
6
06-25-2025, 06:31 AM
#4
It doesn<|pad|> to be a less useful figure here. Those numbers—3.2Ghz and 12.9Ghz—still represent distinct chips.
R
Raeltris
06-25-2025, 06:31 AM #4

It doesn<|pad|> to be a less useful figure here. Those numbers—3.2Ghz and 12.9Ghz—still represent distinct chips.

I
IshTheFish
Junior Member
32
06-25-2025, 08:27 AM
#5
Only the base clock spec exists to let OEMs market CPUs with inferior coolers
I
IshTheFish
06-25-2025, 08:27 AM #5

Only the base clock spec exists to let OEMs market CPUs with inferior coolers

C
chenglee1998
Member
147
06-25-2025, 04:26 PM
#6
I thought it was due to them lowering RMAs. Only the poorest silicon from Intel operates at full capacity.
C
chenglee1998
06-25-2025, 04:26 PM #6

I thought it was due to them lowering RMAs. Only the poorest silicon from Intel operates at full capacity.

M
MiniYBallY
Junior Member
30
06-30-2025, 11:30 PM
#7
I kind of doubt that. I haven't had an Intel system or known of any that couldn't reach their default turbo boosts when adequately cooled. And they will run at max turbo (well, all-core max turbo anyway) out of the box if adequately cooled; no way to even know if something was ever overclocked if you don't tell them. And most people running their systems on default won't. The only times I've ever seen a chip run below their all-core turbo is after PL2 runs out or thermal throttling....in which case for OEMs is like most scenarios
M
MiniYBallY
06-30-2025, 11:30 PM #7

I kind of doubt that. I haven't had an Intel system or known of any that couldn't reach their default turbo boosts when adequately cooled. And they will run at max turbo (well, all-core max turbo anyway) out of the box if adequately cooled; no way to even know if something was ever overclocked if you don't tell them. And most people running their systems on default won't. The only times I've ever seen a chip run below their all-core turbo is after PL2 runs out or thermal throttling....in which case for OEMs is like most scenarios

T
TheAndresMPvP
Member
59
07-01-2025, 05:57 PM
#8
I noticed they didn’t activate the turbo boost, but the issue lay with the motherboard rather than the CPU. This was my Hero X board. The i7 8086k was overclocked from the start and wasn’t tested with its original settings. After converting it to a productivity setup last month, I left it stock and it failed to reach its boost frequency. When I moved it to an Aorus Ultra Z390, everything worked fine. I’d have preferred more time on that but needed to keep the system operational for work. The Z390 was part of my bench setup with my older i7 8700k, which only handled its boost and didn’t impress me.
T
TheAndresMPvP
07-01-2025, 05:57 PM #8

I noticed they didn’t activate the turbo boost, but the issue lay with the motherboard rather than the CPU. This was my Hero X board. The i7 8086k was overclocked from the start and wasn’t tested with its original settings. After converting it to a productivity setup last month, I left it stock and it failed to reach its boost frequency. When I moved it to an Aorus Ultra Z390, everything worked fine. I’d have preferred more time on that but needed to keep the system operational for work. The Z390 was part of my bench setup with my older i7 8700k, which only handled its boost and didn’t impress me.

T
Tia0007
Member
59
07-01-2025, 09:59 PM
#9
Well they're really not going to hit the single core boost, if that's what you mean. But 4.3ghz all-core is what you'd expect from an 8700k/8086k. Even the 8700 non-K will also do 4.3ghz all core. But they aren't going to be running at 3.7ghz. This is a motherboard issue as you noted, not the chip. I have my 10900K to do 5.3ghz on up to 4 active cores.....it rarely ever gets there. Sometimes in very lightly threaded tasks, and benchmarks, it will. But most of the time it chills at the 7+ core active turbo that I specified, which is 5.1ghz. Here's my desktop usage (current, minimum, maximum, average)
T
Tia0007
07-01-2025, 09:59 PM #9

Well they're really not going to hit the single core boost, if that's what you mean. But 4.3ghz all-core is what you'd expect from an 8700k/8086k. Even the 8700 non-K will also do 4.3ghz all core. But they aren't going to be running at 3.7ghz. This is a motherboard issue as you noted, not the chip. I have my 10900K to do 5.3ghz on up to 4 active cores.....it rarely ever gets there. Sometimes in very lightly threaded tasks, and benchmarks, it will. But most of the time it chills at the 7+ core active turbo that I specified, which is 5.1ghz. Here's my desktop usage (current, minimum, maximum, average)

R
RulwenJr
Posting Freak
786
07-02-2025, 03:10 AM
#10
On standard configurations, many Asus boards align turbo power limits with the Intel TDP value—just 95W for the 8086K. Your Gigabyte board probably allows unlimited turbo settings to boost performance. This approach enhances the board’s appearance in reviews. Adjusting the BIOS to the highest limit, typically 4095W, ensures the CPU can utilize maximum turbo. The base clock of an Intel processor isn’t very useful, as the chip is built to leverage turbo boosts. When using Windows power plans like High Performance or Ultimate Performance, the CPU will run at full turbo speed even when idle, depending on your preference.
R
RulwenJr
07-02-2025, 03:10 AM #10

On standard configurations, many Asus boards align turbo power limits with the Intel TDP value—just 95W for the 8086K. Your Gigabyte board probably allows unlimited turbo settings to boost performance. This approach enhances the board’s appearance in reviews. Adjusting the BIOS to the highest limit, typically 4095W, ensures the CPU can utilize maximum turbo. The base clock of an Intel processor isn’t very useful, as the chip is built to leverage turbo boosts. When using Windows power plans like High Performance or Ultimate Performance, the CPU will run at full turbo speed even when idle, depending on your preference.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next