F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Things like the 1600AF faded as technology advanced. Modern alternatives offer similar performance and features.

Things like the 1600AF faded as technology advanced. Modern alternatives offer similar performance and features.

Things like the 1600AF faded as technology advanced. Modern alternatives offer similar performance and features.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3
S
SirKumsishon
Senior Member
Find
257
02-19-2020, 07:40 PM
#21
Discussing a 16-core versus a 10-core setup is unusual since most games cap at around 8 threads. Yet this discussion offers surprisingly practical insights. For instance, imagining a scenario with four generations of Ryzen processors makes such a remark seem almost believable. Impressive!
Reply
Reply
S
SirKumsishon
02-19-2020, 07:40 PM #21

Discussing a 16-core versus a 10-core setup is unusual since most games cap at around 8 threads. Yet this discussion offers surprisingly practical insights. For instance, imagining a scenario with four generations of Ryzen processors makes such a remark seem almost believable. Impressive!

Reply
Reply
F
fanfaro
Member
Find
119
02-19-2020, 08:50 PM
#22
On the AMD website, you'd locate the Ryzen 9 5950X under the processors section. It's listed there without a graphics chip, allowing more focus on CPU performance and leveraging a GPU for benchmark results.
Reply
Reply
F
fanfaro
02-19-2020, 08:50 PM #22

On the AMD website, you'd locate the Ryzen 9 5950X under the processors section. It's listed there without a graphics chip, allowing more focus on CPU performance and leveraging a GPU for benchmark results.

Reply
Reply
N
Nick_Rocha
Junior Member
Find
29
02-20-2020, 05:21 AM
#23
It seems to be the case, though it isn't completely accurate. Intel remains quicker than AMD on the HWBOT SuperPi - 32M overclocking records.
Reply
Reply
N
Nick_Rocha
02-20-2020, 05:21 AM #23

It seems to be the case, though it isn't completely accurate. Intel remains quicker than AMD on the HWBOT SuperPi - 32M overclocking records.

Reply
Reply
A
Andreasx345
Member
Find
178
02-20-2020, 06:21 AM
#24
The i3-10100F quickly secured its spot (it was a stronger gaming chip overall, though still limited to 4/8 cores), while the 10400F remained affordable at roughly $150 and outperformed the 1600AF/2600 in gaming. At this point, AMD offered no budget-friendly choices—even their older 3600 model was priced above $200. Your best low-cost pick would be the 10400F or 11400F.
Reply
Reply
A
Andreasx345
02-20-2020, 06:21 AM #24

The i3-10100F quickly secured its spot (it was a stronger gaming chip overall, though still limited to 4/8 cores), while the 10400F remained affordable at roughly $150 and outperformed the 1600AF/2600 in gaming. At this point, AMD offered no budget-friendly choices—even their older 3600 model was priced above $200. Your best low-cost pick would be the 10400F or 11400F.

Reply
Reply
M
MU1499
Member
Find
109
02-20-2020, 06:40 AM
#25
Understood. I'm set with a 1600AF OC'd to 4GHz and using an RX5700 (not an Xtensa). I can play Cyberpunk at 1080p medium with 60fps, though there are some drops. My CPU usage stays around 50-60%.
Reply
Reply
M
MU1499
02-20-2020, 06:40 AM #25

Understood. I'm set with a 1600AF OC'd to 4GHz and using an RX5700 (not an Xtensa). I can play Cyberpunk at 1080p medium with 60fps, though there are some drops. My CPU usage stays around 50-60%.

Reply
Reply
Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3