F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop These voltages are within normal ranges for your i9 9900k with 5GHz support.

These voltages are within normal ranges for your i9 9900k with 5GHz support.

These voltages are within normal ranges for your i9 9900k with 5GHz support.

R
Ryant0404
Member
70
02-20-2018, 10:40 PM
#1
You're dealing with a common setup challenge. Your i9 9900K OC running at 5GHz can indeed trigger BSODs when Vcore drops below 1.34v, even if VID voltages are higher. The Gigabyte guide you followed likely didn't account for the specific voltage targets needed for stable operation at that frequency. Setting LLC to Extreme might be pushing things too hard. Consider lowering it slightly or sticking to Auto unless you're certain it's safe. Always test with a multimeter and monitor closely.
R
Ryant0404
02-20-2018, 10:40 PM #1

You're dealing with a common setup challenge. Your i9 9900K OC running at 5GHz can indeed trigger BSODs when Vcore drops below 1.34v, even if VID voltages are higher. The Gigabyte guide you followed likely didn't account for the specific voltage targets needed for stable operation at that frequency. Setting LLC to Extreme might be pushing things too hard. Consider lowering it slightly or sticking to Auto unless you're certain it's safe. Always test with a multimeter and monitor closely.

N
NooLele
Posting Freak
847
02-22-2018, 11:29 PM
#2
It's not that extreme for a 9900k, but if possible, boosting the voltage a bit could help and let you test further.
N
NooLele
02-22-2018, 11:29 PM #2

It's not that extreme for a 9900k, but if possible, boosting the voltage a bit could help and let you test further.

Z
Zbro64
Junior Member
8
03-02-2018, 02:29 AM
#3
I think the setup holds steady at 1.34, all tests passed. Concerned about the VID cores being significantly higher at 1.42. EDIT. After testing with Cinebench R20, it appears those VID voltages align more closely with my vcore voltage, possibly making this update unnecessary!
Z
Zbro64
03-02-2018, 02:29 AM #3

I think the setup holds steady at 1.34, all tests passed. Concerned about the VID cores being significantly higher at 1.42. EDIT. After testing with Cinebench R20, it appears those VID voltages align more closely with my vcore voltage, possibly making this update unnecessary!

B
Bioshine
Member
62
03-09-2018, 05:54 PM
#4
The video signal isn't the actual voltage sent to the CPU; it's the VCore value. VID represents the voltage the processor needs. A 1.344V rating is suitable for continuous operation if proper cooling is provided.
B
Bioshine
03-09-2018, 05:54 PM #4

The video signal isn't the actual voltage sent to the CPU; it's the VCore value. VID represents the voltage the processor needs. A 1.344V rating is suitable for continuous operation if proper cooling is provided.

S
Sussu
Senior Member
708
03-11-2018, 09:18 AM
#5
Thanks for your question! For a loadline, you can choose one that matches your needs or let the system auto-select. If you have specific performance goals, consider testing both options.
S
Sussu
03-11-2018, 09:18 AM #5

Thanks for your question! For a loadline, you can choose one that matches your needs or let the system auto-select. If you have specific performance goals, consider testing both options.