the upgrade route for i7-4790k with 1080ti was unclear to the assembler
the upgrade route for i7-4790k with 1080ti was unclear to the assembler
I don't agree with that. The 10900K is currently more suitable for gaming, yet choosing the AMD platform offers better future upgrades. This seems like the right decision. You've already used that system and it's been reliable for you. It would be a loss to overlook the expected performance improvements of the Ryzen 4000 just because you acted hastily.
It depends on what you're comparing. Going through 3900XT 32GB DDR 3600 RAM might feel like eating 10 pizzas for four people—there would be plenty left over if you're hungry, but it could also mean you're using more than you need.
There's an opportunity cost involved here. Given a budget, money not spent on the CPU can go to other parts of your system. Spending an extra $150 on the CPU with no real performance gains for your purposes is not as wise as spending $150 to upgrade to a 1TB NVMe boot drive, for example. You will have a significant net gain in performance by spending that money somewhere else than using it up on the CPU.
the key points to keep in mind are that intel just dropped the lga1200 socket and they typically retain these for 2-3 years. however, this won’t affect your decision much. since you’ve owned a computer for about seven years, you’d likely want to hold onto it for a similar period, and i’m skeptical amd will keep their am4 socket for another seven years. when it comes to gaming performance, intel is clearly the better choice. reliability and stability are also important factors. regarding the amd 4000, there’s no official announcement yet about its release, so it might take six months or more before you hear anything. by then, it’s possible intel will introduce something new. just keep in mind that innovation is always on the horizon.
The conversation revolves around the relevance of Intel and AMD socket information in this context. The main focus is on understanding why certain components are mentioned and what their significance might be. The discussion highlights the transition from older platforms like AM4, which will likely phase out soon, to newer architectures that require platform updates. It also touches on performance comparisons between Intel's 10th generation and AMD's Ryzen, noting AMD's improving efficiency and value. The overall tone emphasizes practical considerations such as cost, power usage, and expected price reductions in the near term.
Great post and you make some great points here as well. I would love to wait the few months for the announcement and see what Ryzen has to offer because although I was always an intel fanboy.....I am intrigued. I finally decided this week that this would be the week I would upgrade and it takes me a lot to want to upgrade to new tech. With that being said I have hyped myself up so much about wanting to buy this Ryzen 9 3900XT at $806 for the processor, board, and memory and it is ready to be picked up tomorrow. As I had time to think through out the day and do my research I really contemplated am I making the wrong choice here. I am at peace with the Ryzen 4000 announcement coming out in the next few months and I feel like I might be setting myself up for that upgrade by going with the X570 board. Like my decisions though out the day and now reading this post, maybe even taking $$$ out of the equation at the moment, for the sake of my decision making brain. Would you go from an i7-4790k to a 3900XT and be happy about your upgrade for lets say......the next 3-5 years? I appreciate you guys taking your time on this!